Print 12 comment(s) - last by shadowamazon.. on Feb 17 at 3:39 AM

USAF Globemaster III  (Source: U. S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Brian Ferguson)
Aircraft can operate on up to 50% biofuel mixed with JP-8

The U.S. military is looking to go green across all branches. The USAF has announced that it has certified its first aircraft for use of biofuel. The first aircraft is the C-17 Globemaster III and it has been certified for unlimited usage of hydroprocessed blended bio fuels known as hydrotreated renewable jet (HRJ) fuels.

The aircraft can operate on volumetric blends of up to 50 HRJ fuel with 50% JP-8 jet fuel, which jet aircraft traditionally run on. The aircraft can also operate on 25% HRJ, 25% synthetic paraffinic kerosene fuel, and 50% JP-8.

"We're very proud of this certification," said Terry Yonkers, the assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations, environment and logistics. "By using a 'pathfinder' approach, we've taken the success of our processes developed in our previous alternative fuel certifications work and learned how to efficiently streamline our HRJ certification efforts, while guaranteeing the fuel blend will work without notable difference to the pilots."

The certification of the aircraft is part of an ongoing program by the Air Force to certify and test biofuels from non-petroleum sources. Yonkers added that the biofuels also burn cleaner than traditional jet fuels with no compounds like sulfur.

It's also important to note that the blended biofuels require no changes to the aircraft at all to use. Air Force alternative fuel certification office chief Jeff Braun said, "We expect to conclude HRJ flight testing within the next 12 months, supporting fleetwide HRJ certification within the next 22 months." He continued, "When blended as we've done, this is a potential drop-in solution for jet fuel for our aircraft, requiring no modification to systems or special handling or monitoring."

Braun also stated that the blended fuel doesn’t affect the performance of the aircraft, meaning there are no significant differences in engine stability, thrust response, or steady-state performance when burning the biofuel mix compared to straight JP-8.

The Navy has a biofuel program of its own that has been condemned by some researchers.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just another step towards obscurity
By Dorkyman on 2/14/2011 3:52:23 PM , Rating: 0
Oh, great.

Yet another example of the gradual castration of the U. S. military machine. This "alternative fuels" push must have our enemies laughing and shaking their heads in wonder.

Historians will one day marvel at how fast the USA lost global relevancy in the 21st century.

By corduroygt on 2/14/2011 4:23:55 PM , Rating: 2
How does this castrate our Air Force exactly? Having more fuel options for planes is a good thing so the aircraft can still be mission capable in the face of fuel shortages.
Like it or not, it's getting more and more expensive to get oil out of the ground and it's a good idea to be ready for alternative sources.

By wired00 on 2/14/2011 11:04:44 PM , Rating: 1
yeah they're shaking their heads at the wonder of spending $580+Billion a year on the war machine.

By JediJeb on 2/16/2011 12:48:18 AM , Rating: 2
Or you can look at it as the day we run out of petroleum we will still have planes that can fly while others may not. Be it 50 years from now or 1000 years from now it will happen and building in redundancy into your energy supplies and options is definitely wise.

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki