Print 60 comment(s) - last by maven81.. on Feb 14 at 2:22 PM

Nokia plans on phasing out Symbian in favor of Windows Phone 7, which will likely propel Microsoft into the number 2 spot in global smart phone sales by OS.  (Source: Nokia via Engadget)

With Microsoft focusing on providing a slick OS for its phones, Nokia can focus on its hardware fully, for the first time in some time.  (Source: Genius Reviews)
Nokia's new CEO also fires back against criticism by Google

While Symbian isn't exactly a household name in America, for years it sat on top of global smart phone sales, thanks to market leader Nokia's support.  With today's announcement of a strategic partnership with Microsoft, Symbian's owner Nokia let slip a market-moving detail: it is phasing out Symbian for Windows Phone 7.

And just like that Windows Phone 7 has been slated to, in all likelihood, claim the #2 spot  in smart phone global sales by operating system.

I. Becoming a Giant Overnight

The decision to phase out Symbian was revealed in a slide deck presented by Nokia's new CEO Stephen Elop and Nokia CFO, Timo Ihamuotila, at Nokia's Capital Markets Day.

Nokia will continue to support Meego, its joint Linux smart phone OS which it is developing with Intel.  But Meego will only be on a small selection of handsets, where as Windows Phone 7 will be loaded on the majority of Nokia smart phones, according to illustrations in the deck.

It can not be discounted the role Mr. Elop's former executive position at Microsoft played in the two companies coming together.  However, beyond any personal connections, the move makes sense on a number of levels for both firms.  

For Microsoft it's a complete game changer.  Rather than have to chip away and slowly rise in market share like Android, it's punched an instant ticket to the big time.  And with updates soon airing to smooth out its OS's rough edges, Microsoft looks to be in a very, very good position.  It may still lack a handful of features found in iOS and Android, but it arguably offers the most innovative and intuitive interface on the market today.  And its app market is rapidly expanding, further remedying one of its few remaining weaknesses.

For Nokia the move is also a huge opportunity.  As the recent slip to number 2 showed, people aren't exactly very enthusiastic about Symbian anymore.  With its OS budget dramatically slashed over the next few years, Nokia indicates that it will focus more on hardware.  This could be just what the doctor ordered, for the world's struggling largest phone maker.  And the partnership with Microsoft should allow it to expand its smart phone offerings and visibility in the large U.S. market -- a place where it has struggled in recent years.

Probably the biggest risk is for Microsoft to alienate its other partners, like HTC, LG, and Samsung.  All the Nokia hoopla may turn them off and make them devote more effort to Android -- or it could have little effect.  Which is the case remains to be seen.

II. Nokia Fires Back at Google Over "Turkey" Remark

In related news, Nokia CEO Stephen Elop lit up Twitter with a sharp-witted response to Google's earlier insult.  This morning Google engineer Vic Gundrota posted, "two turkeys don't make an eagle, but at least the consumer will have more choice for the menu, as #nokia goes windows"

Showcasing his sound knowledge of American history, Mr. Elop fired back [post], "Or this: Two bicycle makers, from Dayton Ohio, one day decide to fly."

It seems a bit unfair to label Windows Phone 7 a turkey given its radical reinvention of the Windows smart phone platform and relatively short evaluation period on the market.  Whether it's a turkey or an eagle should be seen in a couple of years -- after all, Android looked as much or more like a "turkey" in its first year or so on the market as Windows Phone 7 might today.

More than likely the typically reserved Google is lashing out, based on a bit of discomfort.  Before it seemed to have no real competition for the world #1 spot in the smart phone race.  Apple was unlikely to challenge it, as it was forever constrained to a single proprietary handset model.  And a sinking Nokia seemed equally unlikely to challenge.

Now a resurgent Nokia is back and will soon be offering handsets with a hot new OS -- Windows Phone 7.  The picture has changed dramatically, overnight.

Thus, much like Apple noisily berated Google as Android emerged as a true challenger to iOS in 2010, Google's mud-flinging appears to be found in a bit of frustration and concern.  Amusing commentary aside, it's a sign that Google is taking this merger seriously -- and is likely more than a little worried.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Good.
By Tony Swash on 2/11/2011 3:13:45 PM , Rating: -1
You spend post and post bitching against Microsoft these last few days. What's your goal in it?

I am venting the bile of a thousand wasted hours spent using Microsoft's vile and third rate software because I had to, because it was mandated, because it was obligatory :)

Thank god those days are over and the great beached whale looks like it might be slowly dying.

RE: Good.
By Luticus on 2/11/2011 4:13:00 PM , Rating: 5
First off, you never have to do anything. The computing market hasn't ever been Microsoft exclusive. Microsoft may be dominating the desktop space but it's not the only game in town, never was.

Second, for a company that produces "third rate software" it's a wonder to me why it's office and operating system products are kicking the crap out of FREE ALTERNATIVES all day long. Interesting...

the great beached whale looks like it might be slowly dying.

Good luck with that...

RE: Good.
By Tony Swash on 2/11/11, Rating: -1
RE: Good.
By maven81 on 2/14/2011 2:22:46 PM , Rating: 5
"I worked in a large organisation (10,000 employees) Windows and Office were obligatory for eight fucking hours every day of my working life. This was an experience shared by millions of other people. Nobody chose Windows at work, that was all that was on offer. I was a Mac user the whole time so I knew exactly how inferior and awful the Microsoft stuff was but still I had to face it every day of the working week."

And I worked in a large ad agency that had 500 mac users. So did they not have a support staff because mac is all flowers and rainbows and "just works" or was it a bigger nightmare then supporting PC users? I'll give you 1 guess.
Currently I work in a place where I'm forced to work on a mac 8 hours a day. There's no real reason for this since all the adobe applications I use work just as well on a PC and sometimes BETTER. But I'm forced to use this fisher price "my first OS" crap that has such a hard time with things like memory management that often the computer will freeze for 20 seconds at a time. It has a hard time talking to the windows network (and the retards that designed this OS chose to use an image of a PC with a blue screen as an icon for the windows machines, really classy stuff). I could list a million things about it that make me want to throw this thing out the window every day. So don't tell me how it's superior.

RE: Good.
By sxr7171 on 2/12/2011 11:34:10 PM , Rating: 2
The FREE alternatives are worth what they cost. It would takes many millions to try to even try to wrestle away MS's monopoly in those areas. Yes, that's how powerful being in that position is. How can you use anything other than Office if you expect to get by in the world?

RE: Good.
By FITCamaro on 2/13/2011 11:47:40 AM , Rating: 2
Don't see why not. You don't need Outlook to send email. You don't need Word or Excel to make spreadsheets. Open Office is compatible (not saying its as good. no where close).

Google Docs is coming on strong as well.

Microsoft is just the standard that everyone else has to develop to. But for many of people, they don't NEED the complexity of Office. They just don't know anything else.

I use it because my company does and I can get it for nothing.

RE: Good.
By semiconshawn on 2/11/2011 4:46:13 PM , Rating: 3
Dying with record profits. My kinda of dying. If I was you I would rant and cry as well. Looks like the company you have nightmares about just became a HUGE player in the mobile sector overnight. Pee your pants little man the boogie man commeth......

RE: Good.
By Tony Swash on 2/11/11, Rating: -1
RE: Good.
By semiconshawn on 2/11/2011 6:10:26 PM , Rating: 2
Wow what a pointless exercise. You want to poll about 2yrs from now? I say 150%. Ill meet you here in 2 YEARS to see who is right. bwahaha.

RE: Good.
By Tony Swash on 2/12/11, Rating: 0
RE: Good.
By sxr7171 on 2/12/2011 11:54:04 PM , Rating: 2
They could in 6 months if they really are on the ball and 12 months if they are slacking. I would agree with you on that. If they know what's best for them 6 months is what they would do. But one thing you are forgetting the immense brand recognition Nokia enjoys worldwide. Sadly most of these are dumbphones. However, nobody can put inexpensive hardware in the hands of people like Nokia can. So they do have to find ways to make basic WP7 phones and also some compelling high end WP7 phones. Clearly they have some history in both arenas. This could play out in any number of ways, but if these companies are serious it does have the potential to be a major contender. For MS this is potentially a near instant 30% global smartphone share. It just has to be implemented with some dedication. The rapid changes are a good sign. If both parties leverage this deal to the maximum, it could accomplish much more than you expect.

"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki