backtop


Print 100 comment(s) - last by hiscross.. on Feb 15 at 9:59 PM


Mike German was fired by the FBI for exposing their cover up. He now works for the ACLU and is speaking out about how the government targets people based on religion and politics, with little oversight.  (Source: Network World)
Feds have little respect for your privacy, Constitution

The police are watching you.  If you're the wrong religion, they'll spy on your every move.  If you voice the wrong political opinions they'll be watching you.  According to Mike German, a 16-year veteran with the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigations, this is happening right in the U.S.

Mr. German has become the FBI's worst nightmare.  Fed up with the abuses of privacy he was seeing, he complain to higher authorities and was promptly fired by the FBI.  Recently he became the ACLU's Policy Counsel on National Security, Immigration and Privacy [press release]. And he's speaking up about what he witnessed.

States Mr. German in a recent interview with Network World:

The most disturbing thing we've uncovered is the scope of domestic intelligence activities taking place today. Domestic spying is now being done by a host of federal agencies (FBI, DOD, DHS, DNI) as well as state and local law enforcement and even private companies. Too often this spying targets political activity and religious practices. We've documented intelligence activities targeting or obstructing First Amendment-protected activity in 33 states and DC.

He says that this Orwellian atmosphere could leave the U.S. a far different beast than the proud beacon of freedom it once was.  He states, "The biggest threat is that the increase surveillance of political activity will create a chilling effect that will dissuade people from exercising their rights, which will cause significant harm to participatory democracy."

He states that the "War on Terror" will continue to serve as an excuse for federal agencies to trample civil liberties.  He says that there are no clear-cut guidelines as to when you get put on a "watchlist" and are spied on by federal agents.  It's impossible to find out if your on a list and equally impossible to dispute or ask to be removed from a list.  

He also blasts TSA "enhanced pat-down" procedures and body scanners, calling them "unreasonable invasions of privacy that do not enhance security."

Given the Supreme Courts interpretation that privacy is a fundamental human right and thus Constitutionally protected by the Ninth Amendment, and given the First Amendments protections concerning freedom of speech and religion, Mr. German's claims are alarming.  Are U.S. federal employees deliberately spying on citizens and violating their rights, without the slightest legal accusation?

It'd be easy to dismiss Mr. German's claims as the words of a disgruntled employee.  But consider Mr. German's story of his departure from the agency:

I left the FBI when the DOJ Inspector General failed to investigate an FBI cover-up of a failed FBI counterterrorism investigation I reported, or protect me from official retaliation that resulted. I reported the information to Sen. Grassley and resigned. Grassley put pressure on the IG, so almost two years later the IG issued a report that showed the FBI falsified and backdated records about the case and retaliated against me for reporting it. I joined the ACLU two years later because I knew from my counterterrorism work that protecting civil liberties and keeping law enforcement accountable is what keeps America safe from terrorism and other crime.

Mr. German was clearly vindicated in the case that led to his dismissal.  The fact that the FBI tried to cover up its own wrongdoing and then punished Mr. German certainly damages its credibility and offers support for Mr. German's claims.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By dgingeri on 2/8/2011 11:08:02 AM , Rating: 5
Those guns keep this country free. The right to bear arms is not for personal defense or for hunting. It is for defending our country from forces in the government itself when they get out of control. It's not a matter of "if" but rather "when". There will always be power mongers who want to take control of others. Having guns readily available to the general population keeps that in check, and it is, realistically, the only way.

Those "half-retarded inbred rednecks", as you put it, are the best defense against you being forced into a factory to work 14 hours a day with no bathroom breaks and forced to live in a 200sq ft concrete dorm room like they do in China. You want to live like the Chinese commoners? Go live there, and stop trying to turn this country into that horrid place. I'd rather be free.


By The Raven on 2/8/2011 11:20:41 AM , Rating: 2
Well you don't have to go that far. If he has a problem with guns, he should move to a neighborhood where you best be packing. Then he will change his mind. For everyone in suburbia who are safe and detached from reality, it is best not to make choices for others who might actually benefit from a gun TODAY.


By FITCamaro on 2/8/2011 12:01:39 PM , Rating: 2
Your argument is just mind blowing. You must be in academia with your ability to have a brilliant logical argument.


By Duwelon on 2/8/2011 1:17:26 PM , Rating: 1
He's a 'daily show' liberal who thinks he's actually funny and his almost maniacal LOLs prove that. When you're led around the poitical landscape by shows that stretch truth beyond recognition and use a funny face to people who can't think critically,


By Dorkyman on 2/13/2011 12:25:32 PM , Rating: 2
Can we generally agree that the number of times the f-word is invoked is inversely related to the intelligence of the commenter?

Thank you.


By The Raven on 2/8/2011 12:20:22 PM , Rating: 2
He went off a bit there, but he is right...gov't is a necessary evil. If everyone was perfect, we wouldn't need it. If it was perfect, we wouldn't want it. It is there to protect freedom (the US gov't anyway). When it does more than that, it should be stopped.

If you disagree, I wonder what you think the gov't is for.


By eggman on 2/8/2011 2:39:52 PM , Rating: 2
Who's freedom?


By The Raven on 2/10/2011 11:00:16 AM , Rating: 2
The freedom of it's citizens. What's not to get?


By FITCamaro on 2/8/2011 1:07:42 PM , Rating: 4
Yes because your clear ability to speak and bring forth a well thought out argument just reeks of a well educated person.


By eskimospy on 2/8/2011 8:12:40 PM , Rating: 2
Where do you get these absurd generalizations? People who work for a living?

Go look at the top 10 states for median income in the United States, then correlate them with who they voted for in the last presidential election. 9 out of 10 were blue states. (and 8 out of 10 are perennially blue) The 10 least productive states by median income are overwhelmingly Republican. 'Country folk' work for a living? Apparently not as productively as those librul folks do.

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/statemedfami...

I know I'm silly to bring facts into an internet political argument, but some things are just too ridiculous to let slide.


By YashBudini on 2/14/2011 11:05:52 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Republicans: new money, small business

Yeah small:

Halliburton
Enron
Tyco
Wall St

all mom and pop shops.

It's hard work to maintain premeditated obliviousness, isn't it?

quote:
Look at who supports the Republicans: new money, small business, country folks: people who work for a living.

Pfft, not only does Rupert Murdoch not work he's outspent Soros on his multi-facteted propaganda campaign many times over since the FCC first started giving him bj's.


By Adonlude on 2/8/2011 2:25:41 PM , Rating: 2
This guys post is the most inflamatory, profane, violent and rage filled post I have read today AND HE IS THE ANTI-GUN, ANTI VIOLENCE LIBERAL?!?!

Thats about par for the course...


By FITCamaro on 2/8/2011 6:27:51 PM , Rating: 3
Shhh.....you're not supposed to point out the hypocrisy.


By YashBudini on 2/14/2011 11:11:09 PM , Rating: 2
He's also the guest star on fair and balanced Faux as the "other viewpoint."


By eskimospy on 2/8/2011 8:03:51 PM , Rating: 2
They really, really aren't. The idea that a random collection of people with guns are going to stop the army/FBI/marines/government from instituting some police state requires humongous ignorance of how our military is actually set up. They have tanks, APCs, armor, and most importantly a lot more training than just about everyone in the country. It would be a slaughter, and it would slow down the descent into concrete dorm rooms by about 2 weeks. The only realistic way? What a joke.

What ACTUALLY prevents this from happening in reality is the institutional culture of the US and its military in particular. I spent quite a long time in the military, and the loyalty of commanders, soldiers, and sailors is far stronger to their country than it is to their commanders. THAT is why it wouldn't happen, not some hilarious Red Dawn fantasy where fat midwesterners keep America free.

I seriously have no idea where people concoct these fairy tales.


By Lerianis on 2/14/2011 8:07:40 AM , Rating: 2
You are assuming that ALL of the military would be on the side of the people trying to take over our government.


"There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere." -- Isaac Asimov














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki