Print 40 comment(s) - last by topkill.. on Jan 31 at 12:07 AM

Joe Biden was plugging upcoming EV initiatives on the road at an Indiana battery maker.  (Source: Darron Cummings Associated Press)
Biden hopes to add 300,000 more $7,500 credits

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, speaking to workers at a battery assembly plant in Greenfield, Indiana, plugged U.S. Sen. Carl Levin's (D-Michigan) plan to expand tax credits for EV buyers and make them immediate.

Under the new proposal the cap on the number of credits per electric vehicle manufacturer would be bumped from 200,000 to 500,000.  Additionally, people would receive the credit as a direct discount, rather than having to wait to get the money back when they filed their yearly tax return.

The Vice President describes, "Just like the Cash for Clunkers program. You won't have to wait."

The measure is backed by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers -- an alliance between Detroit's Big Three, Toyota Motor Corp. and eight others.  In a comment to The Detroit News, they state, "[The government] can play a critical role in developing the electric infrastructure, supporting R&D for advanced batteries and providing consumer incentives."

Along with those tax incentives to buyers, Vice President Biden was also promoting the Obama administration's budget, which will be submitted to Congress next week.  That budget contains $8B USD for investing in advanced energy technology, including electric vehicles.  Over the last couple years the Vice President has been a big proponent of investment in battery systems and electrified vehicles.

Of that, $590M USD will be applied directly to vehicle research.  That includes $200M USD to help up to 30 communities expand their electric vehicle infrastructure, by adding support for chargers, etc.

Biden's visit follows one by President Obama to green small businesses in Wisconsin, plugging alternative energy research.

The Obama administration's budget will like meet with opposition at the Republican-controlled house, but the Vice President was optimistic, remarking, "We're going to reshape what Americans drive. In turn we're going to reshape America itself." 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Let's see here...
By FITCamaro on 1/28/2011 12:35:58 PM , Rating: 2
I think you're a f*cking idiot who can't express a clear thought. I have no idea what the f*ck you're saying other than you think electric cars are good.

But I'll say this. Change is not always good. If something needs to change, it needs to change for the better, not the worse. Will America ever have to change how it gets its energy? Of course. But to try to force it to before both it and the technologies to which you are trying to change to are ready is not only expensive but also foolish. And spending trillions of dollars we don't have to do so doesn't change that fact.

Some day electric vehicles might be a good idea. Today they are not. Switching to bio-fuels is a far better plan. But they too are not ready. I'd be all for trying to fund research to figure out a way to mass produce bio-diesel or a synthetic gasoline which costs the same or less than gasoline. Unfortunately the powers that be have all but mandated that electric vehicles are the way they're going to go, the feasibility of them be damned. The cost of them be damned. The fact that it does absolutely nothing for our economy be damned.

On one hand they're saying we have to be less reliant on foreign sources of energy, but at the same time they're pushing us to being more dependent. Please explain to us how shutting down oil drilling and exploration makes us less dependent. No the goal is to make us more dependent so the price goes up so electrics have a better ability to compete.

And your link is meaningless. Yes in certain uses, electrics are the better way to go due to their max torque production at low rpms. That does not make them the better way to go for everything. Also those trucks are designed like the Volt. They rely on a diesel powered generator to supply the electricity they need. The only difference is they can't run only on batteries ever.

Instead, a 3650-horsepower (2723-kilowatt) diesel engine generates power for two electric motors in the rear axles. So it's more like a huge electric railroad locomotive than a conventional truck. Older giant trucks used a DC electrical drive system but this one uses AC, which is more efficient.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki