Print 46 comment(s) - last by lawrance.. on Feb 2 at 9:47 PM

Windows Phone handsets moved 2 million units in November and December, despite only being on America's second and fourth largest networks.
Results are rather mixed, and can be viewed either optimistically or pessimistically

There are now over 2 million Windows Phone 7 licenses delivered to OEMs, but what does that mean for Microsoft and the future of this platform?

During Android's first few months on the market it had only a few percent market share, versus Apple and Research in Motion's dominant positions in the U.S.  Now it owns half the market.

Microsoft is clearly hoping for a bit of the same magic.  The company arguably has the most innovative interface on any smartphone on the market today.  While RIM, Apple, and Google all rely on chiclet-style app grids at the heart their GUI (Google, at least, adds animated widgets to the homescreen), Windows Phone 7 offers a striking visual spectacle of animated menus, most of which are timesaving and intuitive.

Microsoft announced this week that Windows Phone 7 moved 2 million licenses in Q4 2010.  That's largely in line with what one might expect, as it indicates that Microsoft sustained the sales pace indicated by previously released figures.  The platform launched on November 8, 2010 and within six weeks (on December 20) had sold 1.5 million units.  

Some were quick to jump on the sales, largely using analysts to hack away at the platform.  Writes Bloomberg:

Microsoft Corp. said it shipped more than 2 million copies of the Windows Phone 7 operating system last quarter, as the company tried to reverse sliding smartphone market share...

The shipment figure isn’t all that rosy, said Kevin Burden, an analyst at ABI Research.

"The number shows there’s a lot of competition in this space and Windows Phone 7 is having a hard time being heard over the crowd," said Burden, who is based in Hopkinton, Massachusetts.

Microsoft defends itself.  In an interview with All Things Digital's Mobilized blog, Microsoft Senior Product Manager Greg Sullivan is quoted as saying, "We’re still in the early stages. When people use this phone, they really, really like it. One of the key ways that we’ll measure success of Windows Phone is did we ship a phone people love."

He says that the 93 percent approval rating the platform enjoys by Microsoft's accounting is proof of a successful mission.  Windows Phone 7 users we have interviewed do appear to echo this sort of positive response.  Virtually every Windows Phone 7 user we spoke to at CES (none of which worked for Microsoft or a phone carrier) spoke glowingly of the platform.

But there's a lot more to this story, both good and bad that is being largely overlooked.

First, Microsoft sales look more impressive, given that it is only currently offered on AT&T and T-Mobile in the U.S.  The good here is that sales will obviously pick up when the new platform lands on America's largest wireless network (Verizon).  The bad news is that Microsoft set a slow schedule for the Verizon and Sprint launches, with no concrete launch dates yet.

Second, like Android, Microsoft is pursuing an aggressive update schedule, which should help it.  It plans to deliver a pair of major updates this spring, which will bring customers copy/paste and multi-tasking.  These updates will "catch it up" with its competitors, so to speak.  This is definitely a positive for Microsoft, and should greatly help the platform's image.

A less than positive note, however, is the phantom data problem.  Microsoft claims the problem, in which phones transmit large amounts of data (tens to hundreds of megabytes of data daily -- or more) is limited to a "single digit" percentage of users.  Yet it has failed to act responsibly and warn users, allowing them to remove the offending program.  It has also failed to provide users with sufficient reassurances that they will not be charged with data overages.

Speculation is running wild about what the offending program may be, following Microsoft identifying it as a third party solution.  One report accuses the HTC Hub of being responsible for the phantom menace; others have accused Yahoo! Mail.  Overall, this problem and Microsoft's poor response are dual negative marks for the platform's image.

So with all this mix of good or bad, what is the outlook for the platform?  Well, ultimately Windows Phone 7 has an increasing array of handsets, and its sales aren't that bad, so we expect the platform to survive and slowly gain market share.  Still, how fast it gains market share is largely dependent on how well it delivers on platform updates and whether it chooses to start acting responsibly about its platform's data issues.

Update: Thur. 1/27/2011 2:50 p.m. -

We reached out to our Microsoft press contact for more information concerning some news networks' negative depiction of this sales data and update on the phantom data issue.  While the spokesperson did not provide us with answers to our specific questions, as requested, they did offer us a general statement.  

They emphasized the following metrics:

• Early research indicates 93% of customers worldwide are satisfied with Windows Phone 7, and 90% would recommend to others.
• Developer engagement is excellent with customers getting access to an average of 100 new apps a day and more than 6,500 apps overall on Marketplace.
• Over 2MM licenses sold to OEMs worldwide. 

And they add, "Sales are an important measure of success, but for a new platform customer satisfaction and active developer investment can be even more important leading indicators of long-term success.These early signs of satisfaction from customers and developers are reason to be bullish about the foundation for long-term success for Windows Phone 7."

We will again, try to provide an update as soon as Microsoft offers more specifics on the data usage issues that are afflicting some WP7 users.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: true it lacks exposure
By radium69 on 1/27/2011 3:43:13 PM , Rating: 2
Multitasking, jeez.
My sony ericsson w810i from 6 years ago still has it.
Even my C905 has it. Although it's not a smartphone and has all those gimmicks.

Let them get a physical keyboard and dpad aswell. The galaxy S is already starting to bore me. Touchscreen this touchscreen that. Iam not hating on all those phones, but the user friendliness sucks anyhow. I use a phone for calling and texting. And most new phones have been lacking these main purposes.

For example, all it takes to call a person is 2 physical presses on the green horn button.
They should make a 5 button dpad, left right up down, and center button. Browsing through contact list with finger touching is , 1. Annoying. 2. Takes more time.

I really like some of the features that my phone has.
Press down on dpad to open contact list, press left to open games, press up for menu, you get the point.

They can build a much better user experience, but everything is going towards big screen and touch capability, apps etc.

I really hate the mentality of todays phones. Im on a contract and going to replace my phone in may, but there are no normal phones anymore. Only the crappy ones.

And don't get me started on battery life, simply rediculous. Even with the brightness down it sucks it all up in just a few hours.

While my sony ericsson easily lasts three days.
Get your sh*t straight, please...

Sorry for my terrible grammar, I'm not english.
I just wish some people woke up and skip the hype.

RE: true it lacks exposure
By bodar on 1/27/2011 7:34:06 PM , Rating: 2
Battery issues aside, on what planet is using a d-pad faster for browsing contacts that using a touchscreen to swipe with your finger? Or better yet, type the first few letters of the name? Maybe the problem is the Samsung Contacts app...

RE: true it lacks exposure
By Disorganise on 1/30/2011 9:23:59 PM , Rating: 2
On planet 'public transport' where random bumps and jolts cause no end of 'oops' calls. Physical clicky buttons are much more accurate in those circumstances.

RE: true it lacks exposure
By bodar on 1/31/2011 7:18:16 PM , Rating: 2
Fair enough. I don't take the bus much anymore, but I never had problems, personally (the 4.3" screen helps). I still think that touch screens are superior in more situations and that I prefer them to d-pads. Clearly I'm not alone, considering the current design trends.

"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki