A University of Vermont researcher has
created robots that are capable of evolving, much like tadpoles becoming
Bongard, creator of the evolving robots and an assistant professor in the
University of Vermont's College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, has
simulated and created robots
that change body performance over time instead of having a fixed body
form and behavioral traits like other robots.
this point, robots have been designed and built one specific way and are
programmed directly instead of having to learn
certain behaviors. But Bongard argues that this method may not produce the
most efficient robots.
Bongard has created robots capable of evolving both its body and behavior over
a period of time, much like the way humans grow from babies to adults. The goal
is to create four-legged, upright robots that can move to a light source
robots were made in many different ways. Some start out flat on the ground, or
like snakes with legs while others may have splayed legs like lizards. The
robots may start out in any of these forms, but the end result is that they
form upright legs and know how to use them. They have 12 moving parts and are
very simple-looking structures with a jointed spine, the look of a mammal's
skeleton, and four sticks for legs.
prototypes for these robots were made of Lego's, showing how the evolution of
these robots would work. They were made as four-legged "robots" like
in the simulation, and wore braces on its front and back legs that would tilt
it. This causes the controller to look for successful movement patterns, which results
in the legs going from horizontal to vertical. They would go from a reptile to
built a relatively simple robot out of a couple of Lego Mindstorm kits to
demonstrate that you actually could do it," said Bongard.
the real robots, Bongard first ran 5,000 computer simulations -- each taking
about 30 hours to complete -- on the University of Vermont's parallel
processors to create synthetic models that move around in 3-dimensional space.
Each generation of each creature then "runs" a genetic algorithm,
which is a software
routine that helps the creature learn different body motions such as
slithering, crawling or walking. An appropriate motion is applied to each
generation of the creature, giving it a proper plan to be able to obtain the
goal of moving toward a light source without falling over.
snake and reptilian robots are, in essence, training wheels," said Bongard.
"They allow evolution to find motion patterns quicker, because those kinds
of robots can't fall over. So evolution only has to solve the movement problem,
but not the balance problem, initially. Then gradually over time it's able to
tackle the balance problem after already solving the movement problem."
noted that robots who
evolve this way learn to walk more quickly and have a more "robust
gait" than those that were built with fixed bodies and behaviors. In
tests, Bongard's evolving robots were able to reach the final goal of moving to
the light source without falling over faster than non-evolving robots. Also,
researchers found that the robots were able to attempt new kinds of challenges
that were not previously given to them after reaching the light source. This
may be because controllers used in the evolving robots could have maintained a
certain behavior over a wider range of sensor-motor-related functions while
controllers in fixed robots did not.
copying nature, we're copying evolution, we're copying neural science when
we're building artificial brains into these robots," said Bongard.
study was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of
quote: I take it you did not read my post? The principles of evolution apply irrespective of the method by which selection is imposed.
quote: Your point is meaningless. It makes no difference who or what does the selecting. What matters is that the system comprises a mutable thing that is subject to a selection process. Who or what does the selecting makes no difference at all.