Print 35 comment(s) - last by eddieroolz.. on Jan 26 at 1:28 AM

Until this week China had threatened to pass American firms over for billions in government contracts if they didn't surrender their intellectual property. China's president has finally agreed to drop the policy.  (Source: LIFE)
Promise comes after much fear and lobbying across multiple high-tech industries

China finds itself in a unique position in the world today.  On the one hand, it is the world's top high-tech manufacturer, making many of the wonderful electronic devices we enjoy on a daily basis.  On the other hand, it will soon be the world's top economic power and it is increasingly looking to make its own domestic products that are as good or better than those from the U.S., Japan, South Korea, Europe, etc.  The techniques it has used to try to achieve that goal, however, have drawn global scrutiny.

In its bid to do that, the nation proposed a controversial plan that many feared would force companies to give up their intellectual property if they wanted to compete for valuable Chinese government funding.  But after much concern, Chinese President Hu Jintao promised during a visit to Washington this week to "delink" its procurement budget from its "indigenous innovation" policies -- the item in question.

Top business leaders had gone to Washington a year ago to express concerns pertaining to language in the Chinese law that said that for "preferred" status, companies would have to provide products based on "intellectual property that is developed and owned in China and that any associated trademarks are originally registered in China."

The groups stated, "This represents an unprecedented use of domestic intellectual property as a market-access condition and makes it nearly impossible for the products of American companies to qualify unless they are prepared to establish Chinese brands and transfer their research and development of new products to China."

Similar initiatives were being conducted by China on the provincial and municipal levels.  According to John Frisbie, president of the U.S. China Business Council, which represents more than 200 American companies that do business with China, in a recent 2009 Shanghai catalog of innovative products of "the 530 on the list only two were made by foreign-invested companies operating there."

China's technique thus far hasn't been particularly effective in convincing foreign firms to come in and surrender their IP.  Thus President Obama urged China to pursue other avenues to strengthen their high-tech status, such as research and development tax credits.

In May U.S. officials met with Chinese officials in Beijing to discuss the policy.  Those talks led to more discussions in December at the U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade office, and then finally the visit to Washington this week.  At each meeting China slowly agreed to relax the policy a little more -- until the current state, which offers virtually no barrier to foreign firms.

Myron Brilliant, senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce tells Reuters, "We hope China will make concrete changes to its indigenous innovation regime at the central and provincial levels to live up to this positive pledge."

Industry officials, however, remain suspicious of China quick reversal.  States Bill Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council business group, "The thing to watch for is not them overtly ignoring their promise, but trying to slip something else in through the back door."

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Translation
By amanojaku on 1/22/2011 1:41:08 PM , Rating: 5
I don't hate the Chinese; I hate the Chinese government. I'm sure the Chinese do, too. And, yes, the Chinese government has ripped off nearly anything while producing almost nothing. Remember that the most profitable and prolific Chinese businesses are backed by the government. At one point China's industrial output far exceeded it's general education. How else were those businesses producing products they couldn't possibly have known to make unless they were using knowledge stolen by the government?

The US got so far because of three things: distance, natural resources, and freedom.

We're bordered by Mexico and Canada, who are not exactly threats. Any other country who wanted to start a war with us couldn't have done it because it was difficult to transport large weapons by sea. This afforded us the peace necessary to make continuous industrial progress. Compare that to Europe and Asia, where neighboring countries were easily pulled into wars. We CHOSE to enter WWI and WWII, Vietnam, Korea, etc... And win or loose, our mainland was never touched. China, on the other hand, was embroiled in various wars until 1949, when it split into the PRC and the ROC. It's only had 60 years to modernize itself, while we've had over 200 years of modernization.

Additionally, the gold, oil, timber, etc... in the US funded successful businesses, and created powerful investors. They in turn funded entrepreneurs who drew talent from all over the world, as Thomas Edison did with Nikolai Tesla. As a large country numerically we have more talent than most, and the ability to draw even more talent from abroad.

Lastly, this country's government is one of the least corrupt and most forward thinking, where any entrepreneur has a chance at success and businesses are not extensions of the government. The US government also makes attempts to enable the poor by making public education available, providing scholarships, and providing loans to small businesses. China has only recently enacted such programs and finally developed a middle class, but historically it ignored the poor in favor of the rich. In 1981 the Chinese poverty rate was 53%; the US poverty rate hasn't been above 25% since 1960 and hovers around 15%. Unsurprisingly, the US has always been a major economic force, while China has become a force since the late 1980s, after it enacted economic reforms. A large amount of talent comes from the poor and middle class, like Thomas Edison, but without education and loans that talent will go wasted.

And how does a person's criticism of the Chinese government's policies turn into a desire to gas people? Paranoid much?

RE: Translation
By roykahn on 1/23/11, Rating: -1
RE: Translation
By chick0n on 1/23/11, Rating: -1
RE: Translation
By tfk11 on 1/24/2011 12:27:03 AM , Rating: 1
Lastly, this country's government is one of the least corrupt and most forward thinking, where any entrepreneur has a chance at success and businesses are not extensions of the government. The US government also ...

yeah, US law is never written by corporations...

RE: Translation
By Myg on 1/24/11, Rating: -1
RE: Translation
By bug77 on 1/24/2011 8:38:40 AM , Rating: 4
Nice. Apply today's moral standards to the world 250 years ago. That's got to produce some relevant results.

Since you brought that up, do you know how China was formed? Also, how do you feel about Nero not having a fair trial or access to legal advice?

RE: Translation
By HrilL on 1/24/2011 12:11:07 PM , Rating: 3
Have you not learned any Chinese history? They murdered 100s of thousands of their own people during the revolution. They Killed almost a 1000 of their own people as recently as 1989 in the Tiananmen Square massacre.

The Chinese are still repressed people and don't live in a free country. They have one party rule. Any elections are a complete farce.

As Americans we should have been and still should put our own values above our greed. If we'd have done that we'd have no threat from China. We created the beast that will one day be our masters unless we learn to change our ways but it might already be too late.

RE: Translation
By misuspita on 1/25/2011 1:37:29 AM , Rating: 2
You won't. Because it's not the people that makes the decisions but the corporations. And they are always going for the big buck, hence reduction in costs, hence moving production where is the cheapest.

When China will become too expensive, they will move to another poor nation, have people paid for pennies, work 16 hours/day, and make billions in profit. The sad thing for them is that the oriental people have a work conscience, unlike Africa, the probable next target, who has none.

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki