backtop


Print 32 comment(s) - last by jconan.. on Jan 25 at 1:59 AM


F-35 vertical landing  (Source: DefenseNews)
Jets have significant issues with engines and other componnets

The F-35 Lightning II program can't win for losing. The long running issues with the aircraft have been well documented and have led to delays in the program. Many of the flight issues with the F-35 have centered on the more mechanically complex F-35B STOVL version of the fighter aircraft. A new report has surfaced that highlights some previously unknown problems with the F-35 program.

According to a report compiled by the Pentagon Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the F-35 aircraft all suffer from various problems with handling, avionics, afterburner, and the helmet-mounted display systems. The F-35A and F-35B variants are specifically said to suffer from "transonic wing roll-off, [and] greater than expected sideslip during medium angle-of-attack testing" according to the report. The report also notes that many of the components being used in the aircraft are not as reliable as expected.

The F-35B has had various issues with subcomponents in the past, specifically the ones that allow the door behind the cockpit to open so the aircraft can get the air needed for vertical landing. The F-35B has made successful vertical landings recently.

One key problem that is common on the aircraft is an issue described as afterburner "screech" reports Defense News. Apparently, the F-135 engine provided by Pratt and Whitney has a problem where airflow causes severe vibrations that prevent the engine from reaching maximum power.

The helmet-mounted display system in the aircraft is also having issues, but the report doesn't delve into this exact problems. The F-35 has no traditional heads-up display like other aircraft flying today - all pilot data is on a display inside the helmet.

Lockheed martin spokesman John Kent said, "The F-35 air system advances Helmet Mounted Display technology to capabilities not flying today on any other tactical platform. With this advancement in technology come challenges that the program is actively managing. The challenges are being worked with the supplier." Kent goes on to say, "While there are no current plans to change suppliers, options are being considered in parallel that mitigate the most stressing issues. Flight testing is proceeding with the HMD installed and used with no safety of flight concerns."

The report also mentions an issue with the aircraft’s onboard inert Gas Generation System that helps prevent oxygen from building up inside the fuel tanks where it becomes a fire hazard. The report recommends a redesign for the system. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Uhhh....?
By Amiga500 on 1/19/2011 4:00:03 PM , Rating: 1
I was under the impression that fixes were well underway for most, if not all, of these problems. Indeed, I had thought some were solved at this stage.

(and as most on here should know, I'm no particular fan of the program)




RE: Uhhh....?
By Sazabi19 on 1/19/2011 4:06:59 PM , Rating: 1
Ya, we got robbed in this deal somehow :( We get creappy over-budget (even for govt./military contract) nasty lookin subpar fights, and China gets the J20, wtf America? What is happening to us?


RE: Uhhh....?
By MrTeal on 1/19/2011 4:17:08 PM , Rating: 5
Remember the Mig-25? Might want to hold off on the panic until there's some credible performance figures for the J-20 before declaring that the US military is doomed.


RE: Uhhh....?
By Sazabi19 on 1/19/2011 4:23:13 PM , Rating: 2
Doomed? No, didn't sensationalize it. We have plenty of older jets that will probably perform better to back it up, even if the fleet is aging.


RE: Uhhh....?
By ekv on 1/20/2011 3:31:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
before declaring that the US military is doomed
It's not so much "doomed" as it is a case of the 'Galactic Empire' in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series. You know, where other things political step in and make the military, even though overwhelming, irrelevant.


RE: Uhhh....?
By dgingeri on 1/19/2011 5:00:53 PM , Rating: 2
We still have the F-22. It is far superior to anything else in the air, and is now even cheaper per plane than the F-35 that was supposed to be the cheap alternative.

I'd equate the F-22 with a 60's Corvette compared to the F-35 being a Pinto.


RE: Uhhh....?
By Goty on 1/20/2011 12:35:11 AM , Rating: 2
Not to mention that the F-22 is probably the realistic competitor to the J20, rather than the F-35.

The J20 kind of looks like the F-22, F-35 and F-15 had a really ugly crack baby.


RE: Uhhh....?
By gamerk2 on 1/20/11, Rating: 0
RE: Uhhh....?
By misuspita on 1/20/2011 3:13:38 PM , Rating: 2
I believe that until Artificial Intelligence will be able to pursue a target, avoid incoming threats, perform evasive maneuvers, and withstand unknown situations that appear in-flight, removal of the human pilot from the airplane is a pipe dream.

And you cannot pilot from hundred or thousand miles away. It's just not realistically possible. Not when a split second makes the difference.


RE: Uhhh....?
By jconan on 1/25/2011 1:59:09 AM , Rating: 2
At least there's no problems with unmanned aerial vehicles. They're probably more cost effective to a pilot and a plane combined. Don't have to worry about the lost of the pilot, just launch another UAV e.g. Iron Man 2.


RE: Uhhh....?
By Divide Overflow on 1/19/2011 4:27:22 PM , Rating: 3
Who says that fixes aren't underway or have already been implemented? This undated report is not necessarily up to date with the current status of the program. Large summary reports like the one cited often lag considerably behind current events.


"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki