backtop


Print 42 comment(s) - last by ShaolinSoccer.. on Jan 19 at 1:39 PM


  (Source: dailymail.co.uk)
Smokers reach maximum levels of a cigarette pollutant in just 15-30 minutes

A researcher from the University of Minnesota has found that smoking can cause damage to genes in a matter of minutes, which could then lead to cancer.

Stephen Hecht, Ph.D., professor in the Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Wallin Chair in Cancer Prevention, along with a team of researchers, have discovered that the first inhalation from a cigarette is enough to cause genetic damage in minutes.

Many believed it took years for cigarettes to cause any harmful effects to the body, but this study is the first to actually observe how tobacco substances relate to DNA damage when smoking. It is also different from any other smoking-related study because it strictly tracks the effects of smoking without "interference" from other harmful causes such as poor diet and pollution.

To study how a cigarette's contents impact human DNA, Hecht and his team used 12 volunteers to track PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are pollutants found in tobacco smoke. PAHs can also be located in charred barbecue food and coal-burning plants. One specific type that Hecht was particularly interested in tracking was phenanthrene, which is in cigarette smoke. 

The team observed the phenanthrene as it traveled through the blood, and watched as it destroyed DNA and caused mutations that lead to cancer. 

"The smokers developed maximum levels of the substance in a time frame that surprised even the researchers," said the study. "Just 15-30 minutes after the volunteers finished smoking. These results are significant because PAH diol epoxides react readily with DNA, induce mutations, and are considered to be ultimate carcinogens of multiple PAH in cigarette smoke."

The results are also significant because lung cancer claims the lives of 3,000 people worldwide each day, and 90 percent of these deaths are linked to smoking. With high death rates like these, it's worth researching what the effects really are. 

"The results reported here should serve as a stark warning to those who are considering starting to smoke cigarettes," said Hecht. 





Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hmm
By MartyLK on 1/17/2011 3:14:01 PM , Rating: -1
In my experience, you have to reply with one precisely aimed and masterfully dosed comment that will cause the smoker to be so enraged that a little bit of rationality will slip in undetected, while their mind is focused on their outrage at what was said. This has been successful before and, once that very tiny bit of reasoning enters, it is able to grow a bit and cause cracks in the foundation of the smoker's barricade, which they set up to protect their consciousness from rationalizing their harm-causing habit and how it might affect people around them. When these mental cracks begin, it is just barely enough for a concerted barrage of reasoning strikes to flake away at the wall of their barricaded mind and eventually the barricade with begin to break down and begin to allow rationality to flow into their consciousness. They will then begin a healing process and start thinking about how their habit harms others.

But I assure you, until that perfectly aimed and dosed comment strikes the spot, their is nothing in heaven or Earth that will even get anywhere near their conscious.


RE: Hmm
By Smilin on 1/18/2011 11:02:00 AM , Rating: 3
Ex smoker here. It's a split personality thing.

Suppose you say "hey man smoking is bad for you, does blah blah, kills kittens etc.."

If a smoker has recently had a smoke they'll readily agree with you and maybe mention how they need to quit.

If a smoker hasn't had one in a while you'll be disagreed with or even vigorously argued with.

Smokers know good and well the crap is bad. They know it makes their clothes smell. They hate standing in the cold to smoke. All that stuff... this isn't news to them. They just have another factor strongly influencing them that outweighs this knowledge.

Shame on the manufacturers for even selling this crack. By some measure it removes freewill from otherwise intelligent people. It's evil.


RE: Hmm
By a1trips on 1/18/2011 11:16:41 AM , Rating: 2
i am not sure why your comment was rated down.There is more than an iota of truth in it. Also, it would be true of all addictive disorders. Denial vs Reality.. ad infinitum.. until the cycle breaks


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins













botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki