backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by a1trips.. on Jan 18 at 12:06 PM


F-35B put on 2-year probation   (Source: Lockheed Martin)
The Air Force may finally get a new tanker next month while F-35B is on probation

Any major program to procure new aircraft for the U.S. military is going to be long and the competition between bidders will be fierce since the contracts can be worth billions. One of these important and very costly projects for new aircraft is the F-35 project with versions slated for use in three branches of the military.

The USAF has noted that the initial operational capability (IOC) date for the F-35 is likely to slip beyond current projections. The revelation came from Air Force Secretary Michael Donley at a breakfast with reporters on January 12.

The reason for the delay in the IOC for the F-35 aircraft program came after a detailed Technical Baseline Review by Ashton Carter, the DoD procurement chief, and Joint Strike Fighter program manager Vice Adm. David Venlet. The report concluded that additional time and money was needed to complete the development of the F-35.

Donley said, "I think that's [delays in the IOC] implied with the additional dollars and time required in system development."

The biggest change in the F-35 program to come after the review was that the F-35B vertical landing variant of the aircraft has been put on a two-year probationary period. The F-35B was also decoupled from the carrier and conventional versions of the fighter to avoid delaying the other two versions significantly. The UK armed forces have already decided not to buy the F-35B, and will be ordering the carrier version instead.

Donley said, "The major decision from this TBR has been to decouple the testing of the U.S. Marine short take-off vertical-landing variant from the conventional and carrier variants to ensure we do not slow progress on the conventional and carrier variants."

Another even higher profile project that the Air Force is working on is the long running and problem plagued replacement for the aerial tankers in use. The drama surrounding the bidding process has gone on for years and a winner still hasn’t been selected. 

According to Defense News, EADS has stated that it expects the Air Force to pick a tanker in February. EADS also expects that it will be chosen the winner over rival Boeing.

EADS of North America CEO Sean O'Keefe said, "The contract award, which was announced as part of the request-for-proposal solicitation, was to have been around the middle of November last year. It has moved further toward next month, just as a consequence of due diligence."

The contract was supposed to have been awarded in November of 2010, but was delayed again. The DoD is seeking to make the award "not contestable" to avoid a rehash of what happened with the first contract award.

O'Keefe said, "Every indication would suggest that next month is more likely to be the contract award targeting period."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Well... no surprise here.
By marvdmartian on 1/13/2011 2:49:44 PM , Rating: 1
Personally, I believe the reason they had to skip so many numbers between the latest fighter design (F-22), and this one (F-35) is because the F-35 is taking so long to design, develop and build, that they could have easily come up with a dozen workable designs in between the two of them! [/sarcasm]

IMHO, the Boeing design was much uglier, but I seriously wonder if they would have had all the problems that Lockheed has had with this plane?


RE: Well... no surprise here.
By schrodog on 1/13/2011 3:40:26 PM , Rating: 3
One of the reasons that the X-35 design was chosen over the X-32 was because parts on the X-32B had to be added/ removed to properly demonstrate STOVL/Afterburner functions. Boeing did submit a modified design of the X-32 on paper to resolve these issues, but it came too late in the testing process. If the X-32 had been chosen, I think you would have seen a similar issue that we are seeing with the new tanker.


"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki