backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by blueboy09.. on Jan 22 at 10:32 AM

Hyundai's Veloster will get 40 mpg on the highway without the use of hybrid technology

We've talked about Hyundai's Veloster on a few occasions here at DailyTech. These days, many companies are using expensive electric motors and lithium-ion batteries to achieve 40+ mpg in their vehicles. Hyundai, however, is sticking to lightweight platforms and advanced engines to achieve the same feat.

The latest "40 mpg" addition to the family is the 2012 Veloster, which is quite odd being that it has three passenger doors in addition to a traditional rear hatch. The driver's side of the vehicle has a single door, while the passenger's side of the vehicle has a shortened front door and a small rear door to aid in accessing the rear seat. 

When it comes to the vehicle specifications, Hyundai has managed to keep curb weight to a minimum at just 2,584 pounds in 6-speed manual form. The six-speed, dual-clutch transmission (DCT) version weighs in at 2,657 pounds. Power comes from a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine that develops just 138 hp.

Hyundai says that a Veloster equipped with a DCT will get up to 40 mpg on the highway. The company, however, has not disclosed EPA city ratings for either transmission or highway ratings for the Veloster equipped with a 6-speed manual.

The Veloster will come standard with a 7" touch screen with integrated Pandora Radio support. Hyundai's new BlueLink telematics system will also be included as standard equipment.

Now we come to the styling. The Veloster is likely to draw love it/hate it comments from people who lay eyes on it. While its style is certainly distinctive, it's asymmetric design, bulges, and gaping front bumper are sure to find a fair share of critics.

However, there are two things that play into the Veloster favor. First off, Hyundai officials state that the vehicle will start at a relatively affordable $17,000, which is not bad for a sporty vehicle with good EPA numbers. The second "plus" for the Veloster won't come until sometime next year. Edmunds Inside Line reports that the Veloster will get the a turbocharged version of the 1.6-liter engine good for around 175hp -- the Sonata Turbo's 274hp, 2.0T engine is also a distant possibility. That should make for quite a little "pocket rocket", but won’t do Hyundai any favors when it comes to EPA numbers.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Smartless on 1/10/2011 7:35:49 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah seems like Hyundai has been doing that for awhile right down to the H symbol. There will be a time when we'll wonder who's copying who.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Spuke on 1/10/2011 7:49:07 PM , Rating: 2
I like it!!!! 138hp at 2500-2600 lbs reminds me of my old 92 Sentra SE-R. And with rumors of the 274hp engine coming too?? I got goosebumps! Nav, DCT, and 40 mpg without any BS hybrid crap all at a little heavier weight than my old SE-R too. This car must be a featherweight without all of the safety, emissions, and other modern amenities onboard!! Which makes me really curious how they were able to accomplish that. Some aluminum? A smidge of carbon fiber? Selling at a loss perhaps?

I wonder if my wife will like it?


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Spuke on 1/10/2011 7:55:49 PM , Rating: 2
Just read the Edmunds Inside Line. Probably more than likely a 1.6L turbo but who cares! It'll probably get the same mpg as the NA car and be quicker to boot.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/10/2011 8:04:21 PM , Rating: 2
Ahhh, they updated the article. Earlier, they only made reference to the 2.0T.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Samus on 1/10/2011 9:08:35 PM , Rating: 2
138hp from 1.6l is pretty good. I wonder if its direct injection? They'd have to have some trick cam timing to do that otherwise, which would require premium fuel.

I'm still not ready to consider a Korean car, especially after a $1000 brake overhaul on my sister's 2003 Elantra. If the steel hadn't been such low quality (or better resistant...zinc platting...for her salty Chicago winters) the rotors might not had fused to the spindles and literlly shattered as they were pulled off with a press.

The styling, safety and value are all there for Hyundai and Kia, but the long term reliability is still unknown, and that plays a huge role in resale.

"The least expensive new cars make the worst used cars"


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/10/2011 9:10:50 PM , Rating: 3
Long term reliability is actually there now and has been there for a while (at least for Hyundai). Also, resale value for the Sonata is also near the top of its class (thanks to the 2011 redesign).


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Flunk on 1/10/2011 11:21:25 PM , Rating: 3
I don't think it's fair to say that yet. We'll have to wait for 10 years to see if the 2011s last well.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By smegz on 1/11/2011 1:31:30 PM , Rating: 2
My 2001 Hyundai Santa Fe turns 10 in May. Other than the odd electronic sensor going wonky (especially the tranny sensor during the first 4 years) it's been a really solid car. No major mechanical problems at all. I would definitely recommend Hyundai and even consider another one.


By nstott on 1/11/2011 2:03:56 PM , Rating: 2
And that's a 2001. The models starting from 2007 blow the doors off the older models in terms of style, luxury, standard features, and performance while maintaining cost-effectiveness over their competition.


By Spuke on 1/10/2011 9:25:51 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
138hp from 1.6l is pretty good. I wonder if its direct injection?
It does, click on the 2012 Veloster link in the article for more info. Wife likes how it looks so we'll be visiting the showroom this fall or whenever it's available for a drive. If this car had RWD, I'd be all over it like stink on sh!t.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By bjacobson on 1/11/2011 12:25:23 AM , Rating: 3
I'd trust their newer cars over GM's any day these days.


By YashBudini on 1/12/2011 8:14:45 PM , Rating: 2
That's a sad but agreeable statement.

One can one hope the old saying is no longer true. "As GM goes so goes the nation."


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Dr of crap on 1/11/2011 8:58:11 AM , Rating: 2
WHY are there people that are concerned about resale?
You buy the car, drive it until you're done with it and then you get rid of it.
Since this one starts out at a low cost the resale will be low. It's a given.

Why worry about the amount of cash you'll get after you're done with it? It's the cost to get it NOW that is a concern!


By The Raven on 1/11/2011 10:03:01 AM , Rating: 2
Good point, but I think the constant reference to resale value stems from the issue of quantifying how long a car will last in a way that can be easily conveyed through a simple statement. I mean do you ever hear someone say that a car will last x amount of years? Not really. The best way to somehow quantify that seems to be a mention of resale value. It speaks to the reliability of the make/model.

Someone else might have a better insight, but that is how I see it. I've always held on to cars (and other crap for that matter) as long as is economically possible.

quote:
Since this one starts out at a low cost the resale will be low. It's a given.

People are talking about resale value as a percentage of that low cost to buy it new. The comments about resale value are typically about value retention.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By marvdmartian on 1/11/2011 11:23:09 AM , Rating: 1
Maybe because, as the other car companies have constantly gained ground in looks, performance and reliability, it's the only thing they have to brag about?

Who cares whether you have higher resale value, if you paid more to begin with? If you pay $25K, and get 15K resale, and I paid $17K and get 7K resale, we've both lost $10K of value....but you paid more interest on your loan, didn't you?


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By Dr of crap on 1/11/2011 12:38:20 PM , Rating: 2
Yes,
The resale value could drop because the economy is in the dumps, or you smashed the hell out of the car and now it's on the cars record, or you didn't keep clean and no one wants to buy your garbage car.

Resale value means nothing.

But if you're thinking that Hyundai is loosing ground, you haven't been paying attention.


By erple2 on 1/11/2011 3:46:52 PM , Rating: 2
True, but those are all very specific outliers. In the average (as is the wonderful thing with averages), the resale value will also take into account your garbage car, and someone else's immaculately cleaned and maintained car.

So any crumminess that YOUR car brings into the mix is offset by some marvelousness that someone else brings into the mix.


By 91TTZ on 1/11/2011 3:44:59 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm still not ready to consider a Korean car, especially after a $1000 brake overhaul on my sister's 2003 Elantra. If the steel hadn't been such low quality (or better resistant...zinc platting...for her salty Chicago winters) the rotors might not had fused to the spindles and literlly shattered as they were pulled off with a press.


Rotors are usually cast iron, not steel. As you noticed, cast iron is a lot more brittle than steel :-)


By Keeir on 1/12/2011 4:25:13 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah... I would think the 1.6L would be the logical choice.

Imagine 250+ HP in such a small package. They would be nearing 10 lbs/hp!

A Mazdaspeed3 has ~260 is I recall, but curb wieght is 3200.

I'd prefer them to go --> 200 hp out of the 1.6 and keep the curb wieght less than 2,700 lbs. Would still be faster than a GTI and retain most of the low cost of the base model + really low mass.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 1/11/2011 1:02:19 PM , Rating: 1
Probably sounds like being inside a drum on the highway. You better like the sound of road and wind noise, too.


RE: seems like a good CR-Z alternative
By nstott on 1/11/2011 2:09:09 PM , Rating: 2
Go test-drive anything made by Hyundai from 2007 or later. Then eat your words.


By Spuke on 1/11/2011 2:45:22 PM , Rating: 3
It's true dude. It's not hype. They REALLY make great stuff now.


By MobiusStrip on 1/20/2011 2:12:44 AM , Rating: 2
Nothing like shoving the front tires sideways across the pavement instead of turning...


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki