backtop


Print 53 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on Jan 14 at 3:20 AM


Cyberdyne's exoskeleton was fully operation at a press event at CES 2011 on Friday morning.

The skeleton's balance is controlled by complex algorithms, which identify and adjust for the "driver's" center of mass.
HAL suit could see action on and off the battlefield

At the 2011 Consumer Electronics Show this morning, an array of Japanese companies showed off a bold vision of the future.  Among them was Cyberdyne Inc., makers of the HAL (hybrid assistive limb) robotic exoskeleton.

According to Cyberdyne, there are currently 160 HAL suits deployed in Japan.  Most are deployed in hospitals, helping the elderly and partially paralyzed to walk again.

Kenichi Ichihara, mayor of Tsukaba City, Japan, states, "The technology you see with HAL has a lot of meaning for us, as Japan is rapidly aging.  We are the most rapidly aging country in the world."

Tsukaba City, located northeast of Tokyo, is heralded as the robotics capital of Japan.  The HAL suit is one of its star products.

According to Takatoshi Kuno, Cyberdyne's sales division manager, the legs part of the suit only weighs 10 kg (~22 kg) and is essentially self-supporting.  It is capable of walking at speeds of up to 6 km/hr (~3.7 mph) and has a battery life of 1.5 hours.  The suit taps into nerve impulses to create a natural brain-commanded walking motion.  The suit uses high-strength stepper servomotors and uses computer hardware to maintain balance when standing, walking, or climbing with the suit.

Perhaps the most intriguing detail shared with us was Mr. Kuno's statement that the U.S. government had contacted the company and expressed interest in purchasing HAL suits.  He said the military primarily was hoping to use the suits in a medical capacity (e.g. for rehabilitating or providing increased mobility to injured soldiers). 

Mr. Kuno wouldn't comment on the possibility of weaponization of the suit, which thus far has been used primarily for peaceful medical purchases.  A couple of U.S. firms, including Raytheon and Lockheed Martin have been contracted by the U.S. government to produce exoskeleton prototypes. 

While the possibility of carrying heavy weaponry or shielding of some type (e.g. shatter-proof glass, metal, etc.) in-battle has not been mentioned by these contractors, it surely is under consideration.  These contractors have explicitly mentioned battlefield deployment, though, for purposes such as carrying munitions.

Since their products are attached to humans, Cyberdyne and its affiliates are very cognizant of risks and safety.  States Mayor Ichihara, "Safety is very important.  We can't have accidents or mistakes."


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Japan built it to help people, US for the military
By ekv on 1/10/2011 5:27:11 AM , Rating: -1
quote:
you mean the same the US helped un-stabilize in the first place?
how so? Just curious. [I assume you're going to regurgitate the same old "it's Bush's fault" drivel....]
quote:
Sounds like a heck of a business enterprise
And that would explain 14 trillion dollar debt, no?


By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 1/10/2011 8:10:57 AM , Rating: 2
Actually, Bush Jr was a record over-spender, like his father, and like Reagan. He just took the war costs off the books to make them look better. Clinton balanced the budget, but he also took cash from Social Security to do that. But yes, as far as profligacy is concerned, Bush Jr was a record over spender. That is not a political barb, just a fact of the numbers.


By knutjb on 1/10/2011 9:12:02 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Clinton balanced the budget,
He did not "balance the budget" he merely agreed with Newt. The legislative branch should be the held equally accountable in the success of the economy, if not in greater. As for Social inSecurity LBJ was the one who first started the bad habit of raiding that pot of money so he could fight a war. Funny how that doesn't make it into the discourse. Either way Social inSecurity was misguided at best by allowing politicians the hold the purse strings.
quote:
But yes, as far as profligacy is concerned, Bush Jr was a record over spender.
But don't forget Obama has spent more than Bush Jr did in eight in just two years.
quote:
That is not a political barb, just a fact of the numbers.
I beg to differ, you cherry picked one party over the other when both are guilty of over spending but only one had actually, in the legislative branch, wrote bills that cut spending other than military.


By ZachDontScare on 1/10/2011 2:58:00 PM , Rating: 2
Um, sweetcheeks, Congress holds the spending power.

So a better historical perspective would be that while the Dems held congress, they ran up debt, and for the brief period after the Republicans took congress back in the mid 90s, *thats* when the budget was balanced. They then fell back into their old tricks, losing touch with why they were elected, lost the congress, Pelosi takes over, and nearly doubles the debt in a just 3 years.


“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki