backtop


Print 23 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jan 8 at 1:00 AM

OCZ delivers some astonishing performance numbers with its latest generation 2.5: SSD

It seem as though each day is better than the next when it comes to new product announcements here at CES -- especially when it comes to the hot field of SSDs. Everyone is in a game of one-upmanship, with Micron announcing its 415/260 (read/write) RealSSD C400 on Tuesday and Corsair announcing its 480/320 Performance 3 Series yesterday.

Now it's OCZ's turn to blow everyone out the water with its new Vertex 3 Pro. The Vertex 3 Pro is based on SandForce's SF-2582 SATA III/6Gbps compliant controller, and delivers read speeds of a whopping 550MB/sec and write speeds of an almost equally blazing 525MB/sec.

When paired with a SATA III controller, the real world numbers are equally impressive. Anand Shimpi of AnandTech was able to record a maximum of 492MB/sec sequential read and 518MB/sec sequential write using a prototype drive.

"Performance may even increase by the time OCZ actually ships the drive," said Shimpi. "Furthermore, this is the performance of a single drive with a single controller - there’s no funny on-board RAID going on, we’re just talking about the performance of a single drive."

The Vertex 3 Pro SSDs will be available in capacities ranging from 64GB to 512GB. We'll get your some up close and personal pictures of the SSDs (and hopefully a word on pricing) later today.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By mindless1 on 1/8/2011 1:00:35 AM , Rating: 2
You seem to be conveniently omitting a few things.

1) You have to be assuming either the source or destination is another equally fast SSD. How many of the small minority of users of a PC, will comprise the smaller still minority that have more than one SSD in their system, among the smaller still group having them not in RAID so there is a separate source and destination volume, and of this minuscule group, how many are going to be copying DVD images back and forth in a situation where it really matters how many seconds it takes?

IMO, common sense has gone out the window on your argument, particularly when it takes far longer just to read in the DVD from the source disc, and even moreso when you consider the average person doesn't even rip their DVDs to HDD at all and it is certainly not because there may or may not be an 18 sec vs 9 second difference from one particular SSD make and model they could be in the future.

You wrote "give people more speed and headroom and they will always find ways to use it"... Nope. The vast majority of semi-modern PCs turned on right now are idling away at under 5% CPU utilization, possibly an equally low storage throughput utilization, and their users are by far the biggest bottleneck.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki