Print 61 comment(s) - last by Smilin.. on Jan 10 at 6:08 PM

Mac App Store launching with over 1,000 applications

Today is the official start of CES here in Las Vegas, but Apple is grabbing some headlines of its own with the official launch of the Mac App Store. Much like the iOS App Store for the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad, the Mac App Store allows users a single, unified place to go for OS X applications.

As usual, Apple CEO Steve Jobs was on hand to boast about his company's latest efforts in software distribution. “We think users are going to love this innovative new way to discover and buy their favorite apps,” said Jobs in a press release.

Like the iOS App Store, OS X applications will be placed in categories (Games, Graphics and Design, Education, Productivity, etc.). Developers must also adhere to Apple's "one step" process for installing apps on a user's machine, and follow its strict app submission guidelines.

“We’re delighted to bring our professional-grade paint and drawing app, Autodesk SketchBook Pro, to the Mac App Store on its first day of launch,” said Carl Bass, Autodesk’s CEO. “We’ve seen tremendous success on the Mac, iPhone and iPad with multiple apps. We’re excited to offer SketchBook Pro on the Mac App Store so artists can easily create everything from quick sketches to high-quality artwork right on their Macs.”

Individual iLife '11 applications like iPhoto, iMovie, and GarageBand will be available for $14.99 each. Apple's Aperture 3 software will be available for $79.99.

The Mac App Store is apart of Mac OS X 10.6.6 and can be downloaded via Software Update.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By quiksilvr on 1/6/2011 10:12:16 AM , Rating: 0
Things like iPhoto, iMovie and Garageband (and even iWork) should not only be free for Mac users, but free upgrades as well. They are already paying an insane premium for the devices. The least they can do is give them the things they need without nickel and diming them on everything.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/6/2011 11:18:44 AM , Rating: 1
Just run Windows Live Essentials in Bootcamp. It's better than iStuff anyway. :)

..and free.
..and cloud enabled.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By KoolAidMan1 on 1/6/11, Rating: -1
RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/6/2011 1:10:48 PM , Rating: 2
Which part?

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Taft12 on 1/6/2011 4:11:01 PM , Rating: 2
"cloud enabled" as a selling feature is always good for a few yuks

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/7/2011 10:20:42 AM , Rating: 1
Hm. Sorry but *seamless* integration between all owned PCs, WP7 phones , and every other PC on the planet with a web browser is indeed a selling feature. iPhoto is pretty cool...but useless by definition if you're not in front of your Mac.

The masses right now think "the cloud" is just a buzzword because they either never use it, or don't realize when they are.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By KoolAidMan1 on 1/9/2011 2:26:21 AM , Rating: 2
All of it. Those are horrible horrible applications you are endorsing.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/10/2011 6:08:11 PM , Rating: 2
Really? You try them *recently*?

The photo app for example. The facial recognition and especially the UI that it uses blow the apple recognition away.

I'll admit that it's an opinion and yours is not invalid just because it differs. I'm not off my rocker though. There are reviewers who have said the same.

Are you sure you aren't thinking if previous versions? If you are I could understand why you're looking at me like I've got two rotten heads. They definately had that 1.0 feel.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By hexxthalion on 1/7/2011 7:24:27 AM , Rating: 2
are you out of your mind????

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/7/2011 1:08:55 PM , Rating: 2
No. I've just actually tried them instead of making the typical assumptions about Microsoft.

By KoolAidMan1 on 1/9/2011 2:27:52 AM , Rating: 2
He is certainly deluded.

By KoolAidMan1 on 1/6/2011 11:47:43 AM , Rating: 2
A major update every two to three years isn't exactly nickel and diming. Separating them out into individual purchases is a good thing. I only really use iPhoto, so only buying that one thing is a good option if I wanted to go that route.

Also, given my own purchase habits on both my PCs and Macs (a replacement one every two to three years), I can't recall ever having to buy a new version of iLife since I just get the updated version with my new machine.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By headbox on 1/6/11, Rating: 0
RE: Does the consumer save money?
By sp33dklz on 1/6/2011 2:36:46 PM , Rating: 2
That's funny.

I bought a laptop in 2008, faster than your MBPro (T9300 I'm sure?), and it only cost me $599.00. I sold it this year for $250 to a relative. I'm out $350.00. Seems like you lost $50.00 more than I did and your product was more inferior to begin with.

But wait... you lost $1,200.00 more than I did on the front end.

Thank god you're not an accountant.


RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Taft12 on 1/6/2011 4:14:13 PM , Rating: 2
I'm glad you're not my accountant -- he took a 22% hit and you're down 58%. What if you had bought 3 laptops?

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By headbox on 1/6/2011 4:31:36 PM , Rating: 1
Did that $599 laptop have 9600GT graphics and 5+ hours battery life? Didn't think so. You can keep your cheap plastic laptops- some of us make enough money that we don't have to count pennies when buying electronics.

I bet you built your own 180hp sportbike too right? Because top speed while saving a few bucks is all that matters right? I mean, why buy a well built sedan when you can get GSX-R 1,000 parts for half the price of new, yet be faster than 100% of sports cars on the market! Oh those idiots who buy slower cars! What a waste of money!

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/7/2011 11:00:03 AM , Rating: 2
some of us make enough money that we don't have to count pennies when buying electronics.

Nice personal jab. Spoken like someone who probably has a mortgage but likes people to think they have money. Those with real wealth got that way by making wise spending decisions, not blowing money on electronic fashion accessories. He bought what met his needs I'm sure.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By quiksilvr on 1/6/2011 3:09:15 PM , Rating: 2
iLife is already a part of Macs. I firmly believe that iWork should be a part of all Macs by default. It's the only chance they have when "competing" against Microsoft's juggernaut that is Office.

And I'm not going to go in a price debate between Macs and PCs. If you're counter-argument is "resale value" there's no point trying to convince you.

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By headbox on 1/6/2011 4:33:57 PM , Rating: 1
they're not trying to take down MS Office, just make it cheaper/easier to work with compatible files.

Why does everyone think they're entitled to free stuff?

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By Smilin on 1/7/2011 11:01:38 AM , Rating: 2
Not free. Included in cost.

When you take a computer out of the box it should be able to play a movie and type a document wouldn't you agree?

By nikon133 on 1/6/2011 3:11:28 PM , Rating: 1
You are right that is insane - giving that sort of money for 2+ year old laptop with all that dust accumulated on its fans and heatsinks, one that even if it looks good from the outside might have been used and abused heaps... but then, there are other insane things defying any logic when it comes to Apple...

Regarding Envy, here in NZ HP Envy 14-1112TX Beats Edition (with i7-720QM) starts from NZ$1,838 while HP Envy 15-1114TX starts at NZ$2,600 and HP Envy 17-1110TX at NZ$2,700.

As example, for same NZ$1,800 one can get 13" MBP with Core 2 Duo and every other spec below Envy 14-1112TX... and price/performance difference only gets bigger and bigger as you progress to higher-end models. For me, Envys are much better deal, but like I said - many things defy logic when it comes to Apple products.

As comparison,

RE: Does the consumer save money?
By fsardis on 1/7/2011 4:32:15 AM , Rating: 1
GarageBand has audio loops and samples that are better than most Pro audio apps?

Only a tone-deaf, shit-chucking ape could have said that. Seriously, stay away from music production. It clearly isn't your thing. The audio quality and the samples in GarageBand are some of the worst I have heard. The instruments sound dull, there is hardly enough tools to use in the software for Pro music production and on top of it all, the moment you start using a few software instruments the whole software craps out under the load no matter how few of them you used. I would understand it if they were all third party plugins that made it crash but this is Apple's stuff that supposedly "just works".
Nice try fanboi, don't forget your kool-aid. I hear now it is also administered as an enema but obviously you know all about it.
PS: Those overpriced Macs don't have something that PCs do: Processing power. I don't give a crap about resale value. I wanna render music and videos as fast as possible and a PC wins every time at half the cost.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)
Related Articles
Apple to Launch Mac App Store on January 6
December 16, 2010, 10:07 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki