backtop


Print 17 comment(s) - last by B3an.. on Jan 4 at 1:03 AM


Qesem Cave has revealed a wealth of archaelogical info, including evidence to support the hypothesis that humans evolved in Israel.  (Source: Mary Stiner)

Tel Aviv Professor Avi Gopher holds one of the excavated human teeth, that may be the oldest human remains found to date.  (Source: Oded Balilty/AP Photo)

A variety of early human teeth were found in the cave.  (Source: University of Tel Aviv)
Remains were dated back to 400,000 years ago -- the early human remains found

An active area of debate in the paleontological and archaeological communities is the question of where mankind evolved.  Scientists generally believe that humans diverged from Neanderthals around 500,000 years ago -- but the question of where they involved has provoked much controversy.  The prevailing sentiment has been that while primates may have evolved in Asia or elsewhere, the human species evolved in Africa.  This notion has been supported by the fact that all the recent major hominid discoveries [1] [2] [3] came from African excavations.  

But a new discovery by archaeologists from Israel's Tel Aviv University (TAU) argues that humans may have evolved in Israel, based on the finding of 200,000-400,000 year old remains in Qesem Cave, a pre-historic site located near Rosh Ha'ayinin in Israel Center District, which borders the Mediterranean Ocean.

Prof. Avi Gopher, Dr. Ran Barkai, and Prof. Israel Hershkowitz of TAU led the dig.  Leading a team of international researchers, they unearthed eight human teeth.  

Previous studies have dated the cave as having been accessible from 200,000 to 400,000 years ago.  Morphological studies, including CT scans and X-rays, showed that the teeth indeed belonged to modern humans.

The researchers comment that evidence garnered at the site showcases an industrious early society that engaged in systematic production of flint blades; the regular use of fire; evidence of hunting, cutting and sharing of animal meat; and mining raw materials to produce flint tools from subsurface sources.

Scientists are analyzing the site and the various items found therein for clues into how humans' physiology and behavior evolved to its current state.  The researchers believe the individuals whose remains were found may have been poised at a critical point in human evolution and adaptation.

The researchers' assertion that humans did not originate in Africa is supported by recent findings of human remains in China and Spain that were older than expected.  While these remains were not as old as the Qesem Cave find, they were old enough to call into question the African descent hypothesis.

The discovery of 100,000 year-old remains in the Skhul Cave in the Carmel and Qafzeh Cave in the Lower Galilee near Nazareth, Israel, was another important precursor to the current study.

The study can be found in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, and you can view the abstract here.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

unlikely.
By chromal on 12/31/2010 1:43:20 PM , Rating: 0
What a delightfully nationalistic scientific finding. That sounds incredibly improbable and implausible; early homosapiens likely ranged pretty far, at least until they developed agriculture and did away with the whole hunter-gatherer game.




RE: unlikely.
By NanoTube1 on 12/31/2010 3:50:57 PM , Rating: 4
Why? why is it unlikely? because all your life the scientific community told you it was in Africa? Why is it a "nationalistic" find? because Israeli scientists found it in Israel? What a shock! Israeli scientists working in Israel(!) and find evidence for homo-sapience that are even earlier than Africa. Deal with it dude.


RE: unlikely.
By chromal on 1/1/2011 3:38:32 PM , Rating: 1
I have "a problem" with it (though disagree vehemently with your suggestion I can't "deal with it" (dude) because it's hubris at best to draw any wide sweeping conclusions from a single site. And they're not exactly far from Africa as the land bridge goes. I still think it's more likely people simply followed the food sources all the hell over Africa, the middle-east, and Asia, and anywhere else.

Again, to reiterate: the study BEING in Israel is not controversial. Suggesting that it 'changes everything' has no basis without a lot more evidence than a single cave. Again, it seems highly improbable their arguments will ever be conclusive, at least without a lot more widespread evidence both to support it and a successful refutation other regions as being the cradle of early man.


RE: unlikely.
By mindless1 on 1/2/2011 5:36:23 AM , Rating: 2
Not to nitpick or anything but who cares, what does it matter? It's like realizing that I left my car keys on the couch cushion instead of the chair cushion.


RE: unlikely.
By JonB on 1/2/2011 7:03:45 PM , Rating: 2
I knew it! We're all Jewish!


RE: unlikely.
By amagriva on 1/3/2011 7:02:09 AM , Rating: 2
Let'em think they're che chosen ones...


RE: unlikely.
By Danish1 on 1/2/2011 2:20:49 PM , Rating: 2
oh my aren't you one of those idiots who wants to pollute science with their political/religious views.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki