W.T.F., What's Going On? CIA Wikileaks Panel Reveals Findings
December 23, 2010 9:20 AM
comment(s) - last by
The CIA didn't let itself fall victim to Wikileaks espionage attempts.
(Source: Saul Loeb / AFP / Getty)
The CIA refused to share its reports on SIPRNET -- a system accessible by close to 2 million soldiers, intelligence officials, and private contractors.
(Source: U.S. Army photo by Spc. Michelle Waters, 133rd Mobile Public Affairs Detachment)
CIA software also sends warnings if large amounts of information are downloaded on a system -- a common sense precaution that the U.S. Military apparently never though of or got around to implementing.
The CIA's unwillingness to share saved its secrets, says the Wikileaks Task Force (W.T.F.)
What was the impact of
on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)? In
with Greg Miller of the
, spokesman George Little shares an inside look at the task force the agency created to answer that question, following the undesired release of
state department cables
Iraqi/Afghani war memos
. The task's force's acronym nickname -- W.T.F. -- and its conclusions are simultaneously intriguing and amusing.
I. W.T.F.'s Conclusion? Cover Not Blown
For better or worse most Americans badly misunderstand the CIA. First, the CIA does not collect intelligence or police within the U.S. (that's the role of the FBI, NSA, etc.). Second, while the CIA may occasionally participate in a James Bondesque operation, its primary role is not to act, but to watch and listen. The agency is fixated on collecting as much information as it can on foreign entities and their relationship to the U.S. One such entity of high interest is
Mr. Little comments, "The director asked the [Wikileaks] task force to examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations."
Its finding? For all its efforts to "expose" U.S. foreign policy,
had little success in revealing the secrets of the CIA.
The most the leaked documents (according to
) could reveal was to expose the "Other Government Agency" ("OGA"), an anti-insurgency group that is believed to be created by the CIA in Iraq. The leaks, however, offered little in the way of unexpected information or evidence of wrongdoing (which perhaps again raises the question of
was truly "whistleblowing"
or just releasing documents in an espionage/"freedom of information" bid).
The OGA attacked insurgents (really?). It was once fired on by U.S. soldiers when one of its vehicles failed to slow down and identify itself -- but no one was hurt. And once, one of its agents was shot in the thigh by an insurgent (shocking!). Overall, the leak offered little insight into any more secretive activities of the CIA.
While the Pentagon and State Department bemoan the irritation to allies and
rallying cry to terrorist insurgents
that the leaks provided, W.T.F.'s conclusions are helping CIA officials sleep more comfortably at night. The agency, which requires the utmost secrecy for its overseas operatives safety, remained virtually uncompromised.
II. Caring, but not Sharing
According to former agency officials interviewed in the
piece, the agency's secrecy escaped unscathed only thanks to careful precautions. First, the agency implements a seemingly common sense precaution that the Defense Agency bafflingly does not -- it sends alerts if large amounts of information are downloaded from its systems.
Second, the agency does not allow USB sticks to be used on most of its computers -- something the Pentagon is only now
getting around to implementing
. States a former "high-ranking" agency official, "It's just a huge vulnerability. Nobody could carry out enough paper to do what WikiLeaks has done."
He jokes that if he had tried to use a USB stick on his computer, "There would probably be a little trap door under my chair."
Joking aside, the CIA also did something even more controversial -- it refused to share much of its information with other government departments. While that approach earned it criticism by some, who blamed it for failing to stop the 2001 terrorist attacks, it also prevented the agency's secrets from slipping into hostile hands.
While new legislation forced the agency to share some additional information, its policy largely held in the post-9/11 government. States an unnamed official, "[The agency] has not capitulated to this business of making everything available to outsiders. They don't even make everything available to insiders. And by and large the system has worked."
When asked to post its reports on SIPRNET -- the computer network that U.S. Army Specialist Bradley Manning
removed documents from
, to illegally share with a foreign entity (
) -- the CIA refused. States another former official, "We simply said we weren't going to do it. The consensus was there were simply too many people potentially who had access."
The agency officials shared this information anonymously, because formally the agency can not share its security procedures.
Ultimately, its decision not to share saved it from the danger and humiliation that the Pentagon and State Department now find themselves in. The agency wasn't about to let itself fall for a rubeish espionage scheme by "bradass87". Collecting secrets is a game that the CIA has played long before Spc. Manning or
founder Julian Assange set foot on this Earth.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Govt run amock
12/23/2010 11:36:12 AM
But he did get a cushy high paying government job with lots of minions for his campaign donation.
RE: Govt run amock
12/23/2010 2:40:11 PM
I wish I had minions. [sigh]
RE: Govt run amock
12/24/2010 12:49:09 AM
Be charismatic, well-spoken, apathetic about your own promises, and a racial minority, and minions are guaranteed or double your money back.
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
CDs, DVDs, Thumb-Drives Banned from SIPRNET Under Threat of Court-Martial
December 13, 2010, 12:33 PM
UPDATED: Wikileaks Publishes List of Targets For Terrorism, U.S. Vows to Fight Back
December 6, 2010, 2:30 PM
Wikileaks Draws Ire of U.S. Government With Release of 250K Documents
November 29, 2010, 10:20 AM
Taliban Thankful That Wikileaks Exposed U.S. Allies, Vows to "Punish" Them
July 30, 2010, 4:14 PM
Wikileaks' Anti-U.S. Crusade Continues With Release of 90K Afghanistan War Docs
July 26, 2010, 9:14 AM
Swarm of GMO Mosquitoes Set to Fly in South Florida
January 27, 2015, 6:40 PM
Crowdfunded Sex Toy Lets You Control the Action From Your Wii Nunchuk
January 15, 2015, 3:42 PM
Elon Musk Plays Warcraft; But Still Finds Time to Sleep, Build a Mars Colony Ship
January 6, 2015, 9:54 PM
SpaceX Scrubs Falcon 9 Launch to ISS, Barge Landing Test, Friday Redo Targeted
January 6, 2015, 4:02 PM
Quick Note; Wreckage of Malaysian-Owned Passenger Jet Found
December 30, 2014, 12:42 PM
Quick Note: Drone Loses Fight to the Death With Kangaroo
December 23, 2014, 3:28 PM
Most Popular Articles
Under the Hood: How DirectX 11.3 and 12 Will Supercharge Windows 10 Gaming
January 23, 2015, 12:34 PM
Microsoft Shows Off Latest Windows 10 Build, Preps it for Next Week Release
January 21, 2015, 2:57 PM
BlackBerry CEO Claims Devs are Violating Net Neutrality by Not Supporting BB10
January 22, 2015, 4:37 PM
2016 Cadillac CTS-V Packs 640 hp Punch with 200 mph Reach
January 23, 2015, 3:25 PM
Will Google Become America's Fifth Major Carrier?
January 22, 2015, 12:42 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information