Print 35 comment(s) - last by Starcub.. on Dec 15 at 10:47 AM

Scientists have created mice with two fathers. A surrogate mother is required, but her DNA isn't passed to the selected offspring..  (Source: Science Museum)
The laws of nature are being seriously bent by this Texas team

Two male mammals can not reproduce with each other, right?  That's what you learned in your biology class, certainly.  Well turns out, like many laws of nature, there can be exceptions, with a certain amount of trickery.  Researchers at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas have bent the rules of mammalian biology and created a pair of mice, one male one female, that have two fathers and no maternal sex chromosomes.

The MDACC team of reproductive biologists, led by Dr. Richard R. Berhringer first took fibroblasts (connective tissue cells) from the first male (XY) father mouse, when he was just a fetus.  The fibroblasts were selected as they are easy to induce into pluripotency, a method of producing non-embryonic stem cells.  The induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were then cultured. 

During the culturing something funny happened -- the Y allele disappeared in some of the cells.  This proved a critical step in producing two-father babies.  The XO cells were then transplanted into the blastocyst (developing embryo) of a mouse surrogate mother.  The resulting female chimera children (a second surrogate mother), which had a mix of XO/XX sex chromosomes.  The females (which bore the paternal chromesome from the first father) were then mated with the second father.

The end result of this rather confusing process was that some of the children had sex chromosomes from both fathers, or both mothers.  They also likely inherited autosomes from each father.

The team proclaims, "Our study exploits iPS cell technologies to combine the alleles from two males to generate male and female progeny, i.e. a new form of mammalian reproduction."

The researchers speculate that they could also use the technique to get the mouse to self reproduce.  They state, "It is also possible that one male could produce both oocytes and sperm for self-fertilization to generate male and female progeny."

The team published the work in the journal Biology of Reproduction.

They say that it could be leveraged to save endangered species.  If only two males were in captivity, a surrogate mother of a similar species could be used to birth a Chimera which would produce oocytes (eggs) from the first father, resulting in two fathers being able to pass their genetic legacy on to offspring.

Applications may also lie in livestock breeding.  Typically livestock are selected for favorable characteristics.  But what if two males both have certain very favorable genetic traits?  This technique could allow those strengths to be merged.

Last, but not least, the team's most controversial suggestion is that using a varied iPS technique, human oocytes (eggs) could be produced from a father's cells.  This could lead to two men being able to synthetically reproduce, certainly a controversial technology.  The only question left is whether two females could be made to reproduce as well?  We'll have to wait and see for future studies on that topic.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What's with the controversy?
By wordsworm on 12/10/2010 5:17:40 AM , Rating: 1
This is nothing new to the Bible. As those of you who may have read the thing might recall that the mythology states that God made Eve from Adam's rib. While this science has no plans of using Adam and Steve's rib, I can't really see this as so far from what God has already done.

And, if God cannot do evil, then how can we call it a sin for a man to attempt to follow in those footsteps?

Anyways, fun article.

RE: What's with the controversy?
By Negronpope on 12/12/2010 2:23:09 PM , Rating: 1
Isiah 45:7 NIV

"I form the light and create darkness,

I bring prosperity and create disaster;

I, the Lord, do all these things."

So God can't do evil? God created everything, which obviously means he CREATED evil. "I bring prosperity and I create disaster", what does that state?
Obviously, you don't think disaster is evil.

RE: What's with the controversy?
By Starcub on 12/15/2010 10:47:06 AM , Rating: 2
God could do evil, but then he wouldn't be God. Also remember that on the 7th day God looked at all that he had created and called it good. The Creation of disaster (for evil) is in fact good. However, looking at the world as it is, one could make a strong case that God is no longer in the business of doing that.

The ultimate aim of this research seems to be the removal of the need for any partner in order to reproduce (for males at least), effectively making it like cloning. The church has already come out against cloning, and likely won't support any form of reproduction that attempts to remove either men or women from the equation even if the promoted aims seem reasonable.

Personally, I hope this research isn't receiving govt funding since its aims don't appear to be worthwhile in my opinion.

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Latest Headlines

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki