backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by Randomblame.. on Dec 9 at 11:09 PM


This morning SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket enjoyed the first successful launch of its Dragon capsule. The capsule is designed to ferry supplies and passengers to the International Space Station. The company hopes to be delivering cargo by the end of 2011, and passengers by 2013.  (Source: LA Times)

The Dragon capsule successfully separate as planned, entering low Earth orbit (LEO) (artist's rendering of the separation).  (Source: SpaceX)

The launch is a great success for SpaceX founder Elon Musk and his company.  (Source: SpaceX)

U.S. President Barack Obama faced a great deal of criticism for denationalizing U.S. space travel. Critics contended private corporations would fail and be unable to equal NASA's abilities.  (Source: AP)
Musk's brilliant startup plans to send cargo to the ISS by the end of 2011, astronauts into space by 2013.

This morning SpaceX became the first private corporation to launch a large capsule into Earth orbit, marking a landmark in the exploration of space.  

At approximately 10:43 a.m. ET the company's Dragon capsule launched from the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Kennedy Space Center, aboard a two-stage Falcon 9 rocket.   The stages performed flawlessly. 

The launch began with the first stage's nine powerful Merlin 1C engines roaring to life.  As they died, the first stage dropped as planned, and the rocket soared through the upper atmosphere.  The second stage, which employs Merlin Vacuum engine, then began firing, propelling the rocket towards orbit.  The second stage then successfully separated, and the protective capsule cone fell away just as planned.

The only remaining objective is to test the capsule's heat shield for a successful reentry into the Earth's atmosphere.

A Victory for Elon Musk and President Obama

The success thus far is a great validation for both U.S. President Barack Obama and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk.  Both men took great risks to push the idea of commercial spaceflight from daydreams to reality.

Mr. Musk, a flashy billionaire who made his fortune co-founding PayPal, lives much like his comic book equivalent Tony Stark (aka Iron Man) whose movie he appeared in earlier this year (in fact Iron Man director Jon Favreau cites musk as the inspiration for Robert Downy Jr.'s take on Stark).  Mr. Musk turns notions of lackadaisical fortune barons on their head, betting on outlandish endeavors and working slavishly to see them to success.

Mr. Musk co-founded Tesla Motors, America's first new major automaker in 54 years.  He spent $400M USD of his fortune to advance SpaceX to its current point of success.  The entrepreneur serves as CEO for both companies, frequently spending 100+ hours a week on his duties.  He was on hand personally supervising the launch, of course.

Much like with Tesla Motors, many sneered at Mr. Musk's claims -- and some still do.  Mr. Musk claims that by the end of 2011, SpaceX will be delivering cargo to the International Space Station and within three years his company will be able to deliver astronauts to it at a cost $30M USD per astronaut less than his sole competitor -- the Russian Federal Space Agency.  Many doubt he will succeed.

But for all that doubt SpaceX was the first company to launch a commercial rocket into low Earth orbit, and the only company in world history to launch a satellite aboard a commercial rocket.  SpaceX did what aerospace giants like Boeing could not -- develop a financially feasible launch vehicle.

SpaceX has secured a number of large launch contracts from corporations and the U.S. government already thanks to that success.  So it might be folly to bet against its next objective -- to become the first commercial entity to put astronauts in space.

The success is also a win for U.S. President Barack Obama.  Facing a large budget deficit, thanks in part to his expensive stimulus measures, President Obama made the painful decision of cutting back on NASA funding, deciding to turn to commercial companies like SpaceX and rival startup Orbital Sciences to provide its transportation needs.

That was a huge risk.  While past Presidents and members of Congress had long talked about offloading launch duties to commercial entities, no one had been able to do it.  President Obama's critics were quick to blast the plan, labeling it the end of spaceflight.

What's Next?

As mentioned the capsule still has to complete a low-Earth orbit (LEO) and successfully touch down.  

Assuming success, the rocket should begin ferrying cargo to the ISS later next year.  It will have a capacity of 6,000 kg, with a return cargo capacity of 3,000 kg.  The average cost per flight will be under $5,360 USD/kg.  The previous cheapest launch vehicle [PDF] was Russia's Rockot, a converted ICBM, which delivered cargo for $7,297 USD/kg (the Russian Sh'til was also rumored to be very cheap, but its launch was subsidized at an undisclosed rate by the Russian Navy, rendering valid comparison impossible).  The U.S. Space Shuttle, the primary U.S. workhorse, had costs of around $10,400 USD/kg.

Then in 2013 it is expected to carry astronauts to the ISS for the first time.  The passenger variant of the Dragon capsule can carry up to seven people, or a mix of crew and cargo.  It will be competing with Boeing, who also designing a passenger spacecraft.

Given its reasonable launch costs, it would be surprising if SpaceX didn't jump into the burgeoning space tourism business.  Currently Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic enjoys reign over this sector, but his Spaceships One & Two reaches only 100 km -- which while the "edge of space" isn't true low earth orbit.  LEO begins at around 160 km.  SpaceX would likely offer a pricier, but more impressive tour of space.

And it may be overly forward looking, but it would not be surprising to see SpaceX compete for contracts to send astronauts or potentially colonies to the Moon or Mars.  After all, as the U.S. showed, the critical advance is being able to 
put astronauts in space.  Once you've accomplished that, the sky's the limit.

Note: This story will be updated to reflect the results of the re-entry, when it gets them.  You can follow NASA's live Twitter feed here.

Updated Wed. Dec. 8, 2010 11:45 p.m.-

After orbiting the earth at over 17,000 mph, the Dragon capsule completed its three hour flight this afternoon, successfully landing in the Pacific Ocean at around 2 p.m. EST.  The craft landed approximately 500 miles off the coast of California. 

With the successful launch SpaceX becomes the first commercial entity to join the elite club of LEO victors, that was previously occupied by governments of global superpowers.  Only the United States, Russia, China, Japan, India and the European Space Agency have reached LEO, but now SpaceX has officially joined that list.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: congrats to them!
By jhb116 on 12/8/2010 10:45:54 PM , Rating: 2
I think we're getting ahead of ourselves. One success does not a trend make and there have been several failures to get to this point with the Falcon series.

Don't get me wrong - I hope they continue to be successful, however, those cost figures are still projections and may not even have been updated based on development difficulties. We were promised very similar performance by NASA with the space shuttle over 40 years ago......


RE: congrats to them!
By Laereom on 12/9/2010 2:15:48 AM , Rating: 2
A few things to note:

So far, SpaceX has spent less than a billion dollars and they're in space, and in their next demo, they will actually be delivering cargo, assuming this one finishes as planned.

Their success rate for getting craft into orbit is 50%.

However, ALL of their failures were on their cheap falcon 1 craft...and after their 4th flight of that, they haven't missed a single flight, although they have had to delay a couple due to suboptimal conditions.

They still have yet to figure out how to fully recover their 1st stage, which is critical in their ultimate plan to drive costs down to about $1/g, which is about 1/5 of their current price -- which is still the lowest in the industry.

They are already immensely cost effective in comparison to government space agencies (the numbers listed above are the actual prices they're charging customers at this point), and although they're a bit behind on their timetables, they've done a pretty good job of actually delivering what they say they will. Although nothing is certain, I will say this:

They've done an incredible task with limited resources and there are no indications they're going to stop performing. I think that if anyone can do what they say they're going to do, it's them.


RE: congrats to them!
By randyc on 12/9/2010 3:24:01 PM , Rating: 2
The article quoted $10,400 USD/kg for the shuttle. I wonder where that number came from? Is that just the incremental cost of building the launcher?
I heard that it will cost $1.6 billion to add one more shuttle flight. It sounds like the Shuttle fixed cost versus variable cost is about 20 to 1!
It seems to me SpaceX's per kilogram pricing includes all overhead, and the Shuttle pricing includes none of it.


"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki