backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by Paj.. on Dec 9 at 7:47 AM


  (Source: designer.mech.yzu.edu.tw)
Robotic system could distinguish between minor and severe cases, helping those who require immediate attention seek help sooner

Computer engineers and specialists in emergency medicine at Vanderbilt University have merged together to study the advantages of allowing robots to work in an emergency room setting. 

Kazuhiko Kawamura, project director and professor of electrical engineering and computer science, along with Mitch Wilkes, associate professor of electrical and computer engineering, and Karen Miller, senior associate in emergency medicine, have come together to form an interdisciplinary team that investigates the pros and cons of bringing robots into the ER.

According to Miller, approximately 40 percent of patients who arrive at the ER have life-threatening or potentially fatal conditions that require immediate attention. It is difficult for ER personnel to handle everyone at once, and the Vanderbilt team believe that robots can fill in for the remaining 60 percent of patients who do not require immediate attention. 

The robotic system, called TriageBot, is a network of cognitive robots capable of working in an ER setting. The system works by first providing a robot assistant in the form of a kiosk where patients can register their information. For existing patients, electronic information will already be saved in the system from previous visits and can be accessed through proper security measures. Then, through a series of voice prompts and a touch screen service, patients can report their ailment(s). If a patient reports a serious health issue such as chest pain, the robot kiosk will alert medical staff immediately. If a patient reports a problem less severe, then the robot will provide a wait time and direct the patient to the waiting area.

In addition to kiosk robots, mobile robots may be available to roam the waiting room to check on patients' conditions. Also, triage nurse assistant robots could take a patient's blood pressure, respiration rate, height, weight, blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate right in the waiting room. The head of the TriageBot hierarchy will be a supervisor that communicates with medical staff and watches over the other robots. 

With this proposed robotic system, all of the basic information will be gathered and tests performed before a patient even leaves the waiting room. This setup could help medical staff immensely by having the information they need available for them before the patient even comes in. This makes wait time at the hospital shorter, and insures that those who need attention quickly will receive it before others who do not. 

"Advances in humanoid design, in sensor technology and in cognitive control architectures now make such as system feasible," said Wilkes. 

Researchers still have a few hurdles to jump before this project can advance to the next stage, such as what form the robots will take and how well they will work in a stressful environment. 

"The exact form that the robot assistants will take will depend on how patients respond," said Kawamura. "The design will be critical because patients need to have confidence in these devices. 

"Our architecture is designed to allow robots to integrate quick decision-making with the more common deliberate decision-making process in flexible ways. If cognitive robots are to operate successfully in a human environment, they must be able to choose actions with a similar rapidity, particularly in a chaotic environment like the emergency room."

The paper, "Heterogenous Artificial Agents for Triage Nurse Assistance," was presented at the Humanoids 2010 conference in Nashville on December 6. 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ER Salvation
By TeXWiller on 12/9/2010 12:06:07 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I can't say I truly support "universal healthcare", mainly because Europe is bankrupting under that mandate.
The universal healthcare talked about in the US seems to be different from the various healthcare systems of Europe. The British system is the only one I know of where you can receive free universal healthcare with limitations. This is not at all so in my home country, with various payments for each individual service. Of course, the prices are a lot less than in the private sector. The public services are mostly used by the poor, the old, the people with long term conditions, and others not using their occupational healthcare services.

There are a lot more in the budget for the social sector, outside of healthcare, costing various amounts to the tax payers like pensions, unemployment, disabilities and the multitude of others amounting to 25 percent of the GNP in where I live. The concrete availability of health services is similar to the US where you sometimes need to vigorously defend your case in order to get a proper treatment, particularly for long-term, nonlethal conditions difficult to diagnose.

quote:
we become overwhelmed is when there is an influx of actuall patients and an influx of "fake" patients. The largest majority of our census are cases that should be seen by a Family Physician or some other Urgent Care facility.
This problem won't go away, even with the universal health care. The ED, or a hospital, is usually the only available open care facility during nights. Prioritizing by other means (like education) is really the only solution, with the liability issues going way by repeatable (as much as possible), standardized, fair and reasonable processes.


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki