Print 44 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Dec 3 at 8:52 PM

Using antibacterial soaps with triclosan excessively can cause immune system problems in those under 18

Researchers at the University of Michigan have discovered that an overexposure to triclosan in young people and an overexposure to Bisphenol A in adults can have negative health effects on the human body. 

Allison Aiello, study leader and associate professor at the U-M School of Public Health, along with Erin Rees Clayton, co-author of the study at the U-M School of Public Health, have found that triclosan, which is found in antibacterial soaps, may cause allergies in young people while Bisphenol A, which is found in most plastics, can harm the adult immune system. 

Previous research associated with triclosan and Bisphenol A has been conducted on animal models, but this is the first study to show how both toxicants influence human function. 

Triclosan and Bisphenol A belong in a class of environmental toxicants called endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) and can imitate or affect hormones causing negative health risks in humans. Bisphenol A can be found in plastics and protective linings in food cans, and triclosan can be found in antibacterial soaps, medical devices, toothpastes, pens and diaper bags. 

The U-M researchers came to the conclusion that both triclosan and Bisphenol A can negatively affect the human body by utilizing data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Aiello and Rees Clayton compared cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody levels and diagnosis of allergies/hay fever with urinary Bisphenol A and triclosan in a sample that consisted of U.S. adults and children over the age of six. 

The results showed that people over the age of 18 with higher levels of Bisphenol A had increased CMV antibody levels. Rees Clayton said that this indicates that the person's "cell-mediated immune system" may not be working correctly. 

In addition, Aiello and Rees Clayton found that those under the age of 18 with high levels of triclosan had an increased risk of developing allergies or hay fever. 

"The triclosan findings in the younger age groups may support the 'hygiene hypothesis,' which maintains living in very clean and hygienic environments may impact our exposure to micro-organisms that are beneficial for development of the immune system," said Aiello.

Aiello also noted that people can be too clean. Using an excessive amount of antibacterial soaps with triclosan during childhood can change the way our immune systems develop by altering the micro-organisms we're normally exposed to. 

Another finding showed that Bisphenol A exposure depends on age. Those over 18 who had higher Bisphenol A levels also had high CMV levels, but for those under 18, the opposite occurred. Researchers believe this means that the timing, quantity and length of exposure determines how the immune system is influenced by Bisphenol A. 

The only issue with this study is that it measured exposure and disease at the same time, which shows only part of the overall picture. 

"It is possible, for example, that individuals who have an allergy are more hygienic because of their condition, and that the relationship we observed is, therefore, not casual or is an example of reverse causation," said Aiello. 

The U-M researchers hope to use this study to continue learning the long-term effects of triclosan and Bisphenol A in humans to see if they can develop a "causal relationship." 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Ziggizag on 11/30/2010 10:02:41 PM , Rating: 2
It is pretty scary to see how much this poor "statistical science" is affecting public opinion with results showing what they used to call "correlations" in case of very weak effects with ultra-low doses of substances suspected of affecting human health. These "correlations" actually show some health problems observed within very big populations on the period of lifetime with a naive guess that a single substance the researcher has actually measured once or twice is the sole reason of all the problems.

First - the correlation shown between estimated BPA exposure in childhood and health problems in older age are all weak. Second - as I have just explained - these correlations are meaningless as it is pretty easy to presume that the people who are exposed to BPPA were through their lifetime similary exposed to myriads of other compounds as well as these few people who were detected BPA-free could be equally all-the-other-common-pollutants-free simply because of living in some overall clean area.

Simply speaking - it is really pretty obvious:

if an environment-pollution-oriented scientist is focused on immuninity-system issues he/she will for sure find BPA in charge of immune system issues. Similary, if he/she is focused on endocrinology - he/she will undoubtedly find some hormones disrupted. As well as an oncology focused researcher will for sure find correlations with various tumors...

In case of very large populations - such weak correlations will with good chance be found for whatever environmental factor and whatever health issue studied - it is only the matter to get the grant money for yet another wide screening...

I call it all "junk science" and this junk science is in charge of popular scaremongering. Reading newspapers will show this way that at least twenty possible causes of obesity were diagnosed! In case of Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder - this sort of statistical science have already produced "evidence" for more than sixty "suspects"!!! Everything like common pesticides, virus infections, GMO cultures, mobile phone networks and climate change were proven "correlated" with CCD occurences! In case of Colony Collapse Disorder statistical science has simply shown that its cause can be just ANYTHING!!! What a great scientyfic result - isn't it?

Frankly speaking - "science" based on some very week and indirect correlations statistically found within large populations is worth close to nothing. DO NOT EVEN READ THIS JUNK !!!

“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki