backtop


Print 83 comment(s) - last by monkeyman1140.. on Nov 24 at 11:21 AM


The 2011 Chevy Volt from GM is the first American-made mass-market electric vehicle.  (Source: GM)
Two top auto magazines agree -- the Volt is a groundbreaking achievement

"Nobody will buy a Volt." "You can't make a profitable electric vehicle."

General Motors has heard it all.  But it has defied its critics and persisted, completing the world's first mass-market plug-in gasoline-electric hybrid.  The vehicle survived an economic downturn, the largest industrial bankruptcy in U.S. history, and perpetually noisy critics, and is on course to go on sale at dealerships on November 30, 2010.

Now the car has received the distinction of being named the car of the year by two top American automotive publications 
Motor Trend and Automobile.

Motor Trends writes:

In the 61-year history of the Car of the Year award, there have been few contenders as hyped -- or as controversial -- as the Chevrolet Volt. The Volt started life an Old GM project, then arrived fully formed as a symbol of New GM, carrying all the emotional and political baggage of that profound and painful transition. As a result, a lot of the sound and fury that has surrounded the Volt's launch has tended to obscure a simple truth: This automobile is a game-changer.

Chris Theodore, a seasoned automotive engineer and one of the panel judges, enthuses about his surprise at how impressive the Volt's final results were.  He states, "I expected a science fair experiment. But this is a moonshot."

Automobile comments:

In its metamorphosis from 2007 concept car to 2011 production car, the Volt has gone through a reckoning. The turbocharged three-cylinder engine and chunky, Camaro-esque styling have been traded for a normally aspirated four-cylinder and a decidedly pedestrian shape. Claims of 0 to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, a 120-mph top speed, and a total driving range of 640 miles turned out to be the usual concept-car lore. The true numbers are 9.0 seconds, 102 mph, and 350 miles. But the Volt is far deeper than an eco-numbers car. In fact, it's more than just a car. It's an idea. And during the past three years, that idea -- blend the environmental benefits of electric driving with the convenience of gasoline -- didn't change at all.

We've been following the Volt since its first days as a concept.  Given its evolution it's pretty easy to see why the car won these distinctions.

While there were some minor tweaks to the powertrain from the original concept, GM delivered on virtually all of its primary objectives with the vehicle being able to travel approximately 40 miles on a charge and an additional 310 miles on a fuel-efficient gasoline engine.  The price is also right near the long speculated $40K mark, coming in at $40,280 USD, before tax credits, factory incentives, or other subsidies.

The Volt is definitely a groundbreaking work by the American auto industry, which will hopefully soon be followed by Ford's Focus Electric battery EV.  The Volt will go head to head with the 2011 Nissan LEAF EV plug-in which is gasoline-free, but has a shorter 100-mile range.

The Volt could win all the awards in the world and that wouldn't convince some of its detractors.  But for those on the fence, it's important to recall that similar criticisms were leveled against the Toyota Prius.  But that mid-to-low volume mass-market hybrid established Toyota as the world leader in hybrids, a position that it has since profited on tremendously as the technology matured and became profitable.  Now GM is poised in a similar position and this time, it is ready to be the one to take the lead.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Can we stop this already.
By Solandri on 11/17/2010 4:16:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It will not they are not the same market. No matter how much you want them to be the LEAF is not in the same class.

They are not in the same market only to eco-purists who so want nothing to do with petroleum, they object to the mere presence of an ICE. To them, simply refusing to put gas in their Volt isn't good enough. For everyone else driving fewer than 40 miles a day, they are the exact same class of vehicle. Just with different ranges, and different abilities when your battery runs flat.

quote:
The LEAF is an EV, this is NOT it is a hybrid (aka a combination of 2 things gas and electric).

Erm, that's kinda like saying a turbo engine isn't a ICE because it's a combination of a ICE and a turbo. Both can operate without the turbo, so both are ICEs. Just like both the LEAF and Volt can run in electric-only, ergo both are EVs (electric vehicles).

If eco-purists wish to discriminate between electric-only vehicles and hybrids, I suggest they come up with new terminology for it instead of trying to hijack and redefine common-sense terms. Otherwise we get into the ridiculous situation where we have to refer to a hybrid electric vehicle running off electricity as an electric vehicle which isn't an Electric Vehicle. The most obvious new term which comes to mind is EOV, for Electric-Only Vehicle.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By walk2k on 11/17/10, Rating: 0
RE: Can we stop this already.
By Reclaimer77 on 11/17/2010 6:01:37 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Erm, that's kinda like saying a turbo engine isn't a ICE because it's a combination of a ICE and a turbo. Both can operate without the turbo, so both are ICEs.


Well no because only an idiot would claim a turbo engine isn't an ICE. Did you really think this analogy through first? Both burn gas.

A turbo cannot even work without exhaust gasses from the internal combustion process. Your logic is just...baffling.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By Solandri on 11/17/2010 8:37:05 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Well no because only an idiot would claim a turbo engine isn't an ICE. Did you really think this analogy through first? Both burn gas.

That's my point. Only an idiot would claim a hybrid which charges its battery by plugging in isn't an electric vehicle. Both can run off only electricity. Just because it can also run off gas doesn't mean it's no longer an electric vehicle.

quote:
Your logic is just...baffling.

Wasn't my logic. I was demonstrating why OP's logic was baffling.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By bah12 on 11/18/2010 11:55:34 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Just because it can also run off gas...

There, I'll stop you right there. "Can also" means hybrid, 2 methods of propulsion. EV = ELECTRIC vehicle as in can NOT also run on anything. They are too different things, thus comparing them is the proverbial apples to oranges.

Most importantly they are not in the same market, because one is marketed to people who will NEVER EVER drive more than 100 miles without stopping for several hours, and the other has an effective unlimited range.

My point is quit comparing them as "head to head" when they are not even close.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By walk2k on 11/18/2010 4:22:07 PM , Rating: 1
Not only "can" it run off gas but above 70mph it "does"
runs off gas, "ALWAYS".

We don't need new terms, the ones we have work just fine.

Volt is a HYBRID.

Leaf is EV.

A turbo is... lol not even going to correct you there, go look it up in the wikiopedia or something.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By Solandri on 11/18/2010 4:44:57 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
There, I'll stop you right there. "Can also" means hybrid, 2 methods of propulsion. EV = ELECTRIC vehicle as in can NOT also run on anything. They are too different things, thus comparing them is the proverbial apples to oranges.

That is the most asinine definition scheme I have heard of. You're going to reserve "electric vehicle" to refer only to vehicles which run only on electricity? What are we supposed to call things which can run off electricity or something else? What if it runs off electricity provided by a gas generator on board?

I'm an engineer. I hate diluting or misusing definitions for marketing purposes. If the vehicle is powered by electricity, it is an electric vehicle. If a vehicle is powered by gasoline, it is a gasoline vehicle. If it can can be powered by either, then it is an electric + gas vehicle. You may choose to call it a hybrid if you wish, but calling electric + gas = hybrid doesn't make it stop being electric.

quote:
Most importantly they are not in the same market, because one is marketed to people who will NEVER EVER drive more than 100 miles without stopping for several hours, and the other has an effective unlimited range.

I completely agree with you there. But that's not what you originally said. You claimed they were different markets because one was electric and one was not. That's blatantly false.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By bah12 on 11/19/2010 11:16:14 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously quit splitting hairs. If it runs off of gas and assisted by an electric system (aka prius) then it is a hybrid, if it runs off of electricity assisted by gas (aka volt). Still a hybrid.

I never said it was not an electrically powered vehicle, rather that it is not in the same class as the LEAF and should not be compared as a head-to-head competitor. Way to miss the point of the original post and latch on to the most mundane technical aspect just to drag out the thread. Quit trolling and move on. Engineering nerds /rollseyes


RE: Can we stop this already.
By 91TTZ on 11/22/2010 2:21:05 PM , Rating: 2
You're dead wrong. The word hybrid denotes that it's a combination of at least two things. A pure electric vehicle cannot possibly be a hybrid.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By Brockway on 11/18/2010 10:49:17 AM , Rating: 2
Ok, this took some work to make out, but Solandri isn't claiming the Leaf is hybrid. He was arguing that the Volt is an EV.


RE: Can we stop this already.
By bah12 on 11/18/2010 12:02:46 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
For everyone else driving fewer than 40 miles a day, they are the exact same class of vehicle.

It is not about what you average, rather will you EVER EVER need to drive more than 100 miles without stopping for a few hours. I suppose you can rent a car if that senario only happens once or twice a year, but for most of us that is not the case.

I live 3 miles from work, so on an "average" day I drive 6-12 miles. However I often drive farther than 100 miles to see friends and relatives, or take a trip. Sure I "average" less than 40, but it is the potential usage that separates these as a class.


"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki