Print 90 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Nov 15 at 3:53 PM

Chevrolet Cruze Eco
Cruze Eco gets better fuel economy than many popular hybrids

When most people think about green cars, they usually think of hybrids and EVs that are currently making headlines. The fact of the matter is that while most hybrid cars certainly get good fuel economy there are several subcompacts and compacts on the market that offer great fuel economy with standard powertrains.

Chevrolet earlier this year announced a new variant of its new compact car called the Cruze Eco. The Cruze Eco has been rated for 42mpg on the highway and offers 28mpg fuel economy in the city for 6-speed manual versions. An automatic transmission is also offered on the vehicle and it is rated for 26mpg in the city and 37mpg on the highway.

The Cruze Eco uses an Ecotec 1.4L turbocharged engine that produces 138hp and 148 lb-ft of torque between 1,850 rpm and 4,900 rpm. Chevy claim that that the motor was also designed with an eye towards being smooth and quiet.

Several features contribute to the fuel economy of the Cruze Eco including special low rolling resistance tires. The lightweight 17-inch alloy wheels and special tires helped shave 21.2 pounds total from the Cruze Eco compared to standard models with 16-inch wheels.

Chevy also spent lots of time in the wind tunnel to increase the aerodynamics of the Cruze Eco. Chevy says that over 500 hours of testing in the wind tunnel lead to a reduction in aerodynamic drag of 10% compared to non-Eco models. The Eco version has an underbody tray that guides air under the car and has a special grill with more closeouts to improve aerodynamics. The front air dam of the vehicle is lower and it has a special rear spoiler as well.

The Cruze Eco is the most fuel-efficient small cars around, beating out the fuel-sipping sub-compact Ford Fiesta rated for 40mpg, the Ford Focus rated for 35mpg (although the 2012 Focus is supposed to approach 40mpg), and most of the hybrids on the road including the Ford Fusion Hybrid, Nissan Altima Hybrid, and the Toyota Camry Hybrid.

The Cruze Eco will hit dealers in January at $18,895.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I thought...
By mcnabney on 11/12/2010 4:28:18 PM , Rating: 1
Most dual-income families have two cars, dimwit.

This car is for dad to drive to work while mom chucks the kids in the Mazda 5.

Stupid Americans think every car has to every damn little thing. No wonder they cost so much.

RE: I thought...
By Spuke on 11/12/2010 5:35:57 PM , Rating: 2
Stupid Americans think every car has to every damn little thing. No wonder they cost so much.
Stupid Europeans. Cars are cheap the US!!! Compare your prices to here. Besides, we don't like to buy 16 things that all do the same thing. We would prefer one that does it all. It IS cheaper to do it that way. The main reason Americans have two cars is the wife works in one place and the husband works in another. Otherwise, we would have one car.

RE: I thought...
By mcnabney on 11/15/2010 11:48:18 AM , Rating: 2
I was actually taking aim at the dual-SUV household.

You know, the seven-seat behemoths that have never left the asphalt and the most challenging role they have is hauling two kids and a load of groceries home. Americans (of which I am one) have attached their social standing to the type of car they drive. They also have this wierd idea that SUVs are safer than a typical midsize, which may be true if striking another car, but are far more likely to be involved in accidents due to their poor braking and maneuverability.

There are plenty of people that have a legitimate need for a large SUV. Four kids and a boat pretty much require it. But that is not a huge market and has been met by products like the suburban for decades.

RE: I thought...
By mindless1 on 11/15/2010 3:04:30 PM , Rating: 3
You are suggesting that we, people who enjoy freedom, should do what you want instead of what we want as individuals.

I live in in the snow belt and haul things every once in a while. It would be senseless to keep renting a vehicle to do that or get safely back and forth in the winter.

What is this foolish notion that we are supposed to cram ourselves into some tiny car? If you can't afford gasoline, that is your problem not ours. Supply and demand, those who want SUVs should have them.

The idea about safety is pointless, the largest factor in safety is the sanity of the driver - not even their innate driving skill matters as much.

Another reason to get an SUV is better visibility AND better vision from being higher up, especially when there are lots of other SUVs, trucks, vans, etc on the road. Get in the average small car and you can't see more than 20 feet around you in traffic.

So, we basically see there is no reason to own a small car, similar to there being no reason to own the tiniest home possible even though some greenie would argue it takes less energy to heat, cool, less materials to build and maintain.

The point is, we are not sardines, only poor people have to settle for barely adequate (anything). Bigger IS better till it won't fit between lanes or in parking spaces.

"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki