Print 29 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Nov 11 at 12:51 PM

AMD's Zacate E-350 APU is pint-sized compared to AMD's monolithic previous gen V105 Geneva chip pair.   (Source: Hot Hardware)

AMD helps inform the public what an "APU" is (hint: What does GPU+CPU=?).  (Source: AMD via Hot Hardware)

Zacate adds support for two memory DIMMS (click to enlarge).  (Source: AMD via Hot Hardware)

Zacate and Ontario are only the first two members of AMD's APU invasion, which will soon hit netbooks and notebooks as well.  (Source: AMD via Hot Hardware)
APU is two Bobcat cores and a DX11 GPU

Intel's Atom processor has long enjoyed a reign as undisputed king of entry-level netbooks and ultraportables.  AMD is at last prepared to challenge that position with its long-awaited "Fusion" processor.

The chips are done and in 2011 AMD plans on launching 4 processors:

The E-xxx processors are parts in the Zacate series, while the C-xxx parts belong to the Ontario series, which is more heavily aimed at ultraportables.  Together these parts collectively belong to the Brazos family.

So is Brazos a leap forward for netbook computing or a step backward from the modest performance of Atom?  The answer is a bit of both.

Finally, a Solid IGP

The clear upside here is the integrated GPU.  In its high-end Ontario/Zacate models, AMD has packed two Bobcat cores.  Both the single-core and dual-core chips also feature an on-chip DirectX 11 GPU with 80 ALUs -- twice the number in Nile, AMD's previous integrated graphics solution.

The fact that AMD incorporated its integrated GPU directly on the same die as its CPU cores isn't exactly revolutionary, in so much as Intel already did this with its Pineview (Atom) chips launched earlier this year.  It is revolutionary in that it is the first on-chip GPU whose performance isn't horrendous and that it is the first on-die IGP to have a high-bandwidth link to the CPU (Pineview oddly opted for a slower FSB-like link on-die between the GPU core and CPU core[s]).

Intel's Pineview uses the Intel GMA 3150, which lacks dedicated vertex shader hardware.  As a result 3D performance is a miserable experience.  The GPU's overall weakness makes even playing trying to play back high definition video a painful prospect.

By contrast Brazos's Radeon GPUs should offer decent entry level gaming performance and should play HD video (including Blu-Ray) with ease. 

Memory and I/O

Pineview only supports a single 800 MHz DDR3 DIMM, Brazos offers the support for two 800-1066MHz DDR3 DIMMs.

While specifics on the smaller uni-core Ontario chips aren't available, AMD has revealed that its Zacate consists of a 19 x 19-mm, 413-ball BGA package with a 75 mm² die "advanced processing unit" (APU) (GPU+CPU) inside.  That's ever-so-slightly smaller than Intel Atom's single core entry that features a 22 mm x 22 m package and a 87 mm² die.

The APU is hooked up to AMD's chipset unit, which is named Hudson.  The Hudson chip handles part of the I/O duties, offering a wealth connections including four PCIe Gen1 lanes, four PCIe Gen2 lanes, six 6 Gbps Serial ATA connections, 14 USB 2.0 connections, and built-in fan control logic. 

Together the APU core and Hudson chipset form the Brazos platform.

The 6 Gbps SATA connections should allow for ultra fast SSD access, though it seems a bit strange to be considering pricey hard drive options with a budget-minded netbook chip.  The four PCIe Gen1 lanes can be used with the ethernet and wireless (802.11n) connections, freeing up the Brazos core's PCIe gen2 lanes for use with a discrete GPU.

Thus netbooks or mobile internet devices sporting the Brazos APU could in theory also offer a discrete GPU.  It's unclear at this point whether you could switch to the integrated GPU to decrease power consumption and extend battery life.


Speaking of battery life, the one area that Pineview appears to have AMD's Brazos beat is in battery life.  Its dual core Atom N550 is clocked similar to the E-350, but has about half the power consumption.  Of course the lean power footprint is due to the garbage graphical performance.  We're not sure if that's something to brag about -- even in the mobile space.

Overall, though, when you consider chipset power (Pineview is paired with the NM10 chipset) the result is that an Atom-based netbook's internals will consume about 16 W, while AMD expects a platform TDP of 21 W for Brazos (possibly less for Zacate models).

At the end of the day AMD is claiming the E-350-equipped Zacate platform will last for about 8.5 to 9 hours on a fully charged 55Wh laptop battery, while an Ontario may get 10.5 hours.  An Atom platform netbook will last slightly longer.


At this point it's hard to draw definitive conclusions as a) Intel may have new Atom designs up its sleeve for 2011 and b) AMD hasn't delivered on Brazos chips yet.

That said Intel definitely has cause for concern here.  AMD's chips still are more power hungry than their Intel siblings (+5 watts for the entire platform), but the roughly 33 percent power increase reportedly allows a > 50 percent performance bump in GPU-intensive applications.  With even everyday programs like Firefox and Flash using GPU acceleration these days, this could offer faster performance even for non-gamers.

And Brazos is only the budget-minded beginning of AMD's APU invasion.  It will be followed by the Llano platform (dubbed Lynx on desktops, Sabine on notebooks), which will feature a beefier GPU and a more powerful modified K10.5 core design (not quite a Bulldozer, as some pointed out).

At this point Intel's most compelling alternative to Brazos is to pair itself with NVIDIA's ION chip.  But that approach would likely negate much of Intel's power advantage, and further it cuts into Intel's bottom line, as it would have to either cut the cost of its chips for OEMs or end up double-charging customers for their graphics.

Atom has enjoyed a virtual monopoly on the netbook world, but in 2011 it will likely meet its x86 match in Brazos.  And if that wasn't enough to keep the Santa Clara chipmaker's executives up at night, ARM processors, fresh off their tablet takeover, will likely continue to trickle into the netbook space.  And those ARM processors have the potential to blow both Atom and Brazos awy in terms of processing power-per-watt.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

My dream
By punzada on 11/9/2010 5:25:01 PM , Rating: 4
This puts me one step closer to the netbook I dream about at night....

A 10" 1366x768 display, a realistic 8 hour battery life of moderate usage (idle, wifi radios enabled, say IM client and Email app open and I don't mind if the battery has to have extra cells and make things a little bulky/ugly), HD video playback capability with hdmi output(I want blu-ray capable performance regardless of optical drive not being there.) Priced somewhere sub-$450. I don't think this should be unreasonable soon.

An additional plus would be good linux support. The fantasy would be that this machine would have not only HDMI output but also - s-video (seriously, I understand most people are rocking flat screen high definition screens now, but make a model that can support both and I'd happily pay $200 more just to have the flexability and really have a portable media machine).

RE: My dream
By Korvon on 11/9/2010 6:30:34 PM , Rating: 2
Archos will be releasing one this month that is very close to what you are looking for.

Their 10.1 inch tablet will start a $299.

RE: My dream
By deputc26 on 11/9/2010 6:56:21 PM , Rating: 2
So... is Bobcat on the 32nm node?

RE: My dream
By stmok on 11/9/2010 8:40:31 PM , Rating: 5
Ontario and Zacate will be released on 40nm node in 2011.

In 2012, their successors (Wichita and Krishna) will be released on 28nm. From 1 to 4 core configurations...AMD wants to cover all the low end as well as netbooks and tablets!

See here...

RE: My dream
By Freddo on 11/10/2010 1:27:34 AM , Rating: 1
Interesting :)

RE: My dream
By borismkv on 11/10/2010 1:53:34 PM , Rating: 4
You dream about netbooks? Nerd. :P

RE: My dream
By Ammohunt on 11/10/2010 2:31:13 PM , Rating: 2
How else is he gonna get his porn?

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki