Print 27 comment(s) - last by Donkey2008.. on Nov 2 at 12:18 PM

Apple has history of bullying competitors through lawsuits

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Apple has filed two lawsuits against Motorola in a Washington-based U.S. district court, alleging that its smartphones and OS infringe on Apple's intellectual property. This development is a response from Apple for the lawsuit Motorola filed against it in October, alleging patent infringement.

Apple alleges that Motorola violates six of its patents related to touch-screen and multitouch technology, "as well as ways to display, access and interact with information on the phone," WSJ reports.

Motorola had this response: "Motorola has a leading intellectual-property portfolio, one of the strongest in the industry, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter. We are confident in our position and will pursue our litigation to halt Apple's continued infringement."

This is a similar lawsuit to one Apple filed against mobile phone manufacturer -- and prominent Android player -- HTC last March. Because attacking Google directly isn't very effective since it gives Android away for free, Apple can go after the manufacturers that employ the threatening OS. After all, they have enough revenue to make it worthwhile for Apple.

"Apple's coming under assault now and they're using every tool at their disposal to try and hold the fort," an analyst for Charter Equity Research told WSJ, adding that he doesn't expect much to come of the lawsuits. Apple, it turns out, has a history of bullying competitors with lawsuits.

This comes at a crucial time for Motorola, which is planning to split off its mobile unit into a separate entity, and Android is the only OS used on the manufacturer's smartphones. Some analysts are predicting that Motorola -- which has basically been resurrected thanks to Android -- might suffer once the iPhone hits Verizon.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: What would this be about?
By acer905 on 11/1/2010 12:54:47 PM , Rating: 2
Wrong, patent law revolves around the exact wording in the constitution. (at least in regards to US patent law)

"To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;"

Exclusive right means you, the inventor, have the right to exclude anyone and/or everyone from use. However, it is your job to ensure that people you wish to exclude do not use it (ex: sue them). However, until such time as the patent holder tells the person using the patent that they are not allowed, there is no "infringement"

Having a patent actually does allow you to be the only person producing a product, without licensing it to anyone, because the patent has a fixed term length.

RE: What would this be about?
By BastiWebMaster on 11/1/2010 1:12:16 PM , Rating: 2
I can't really see what I'm wrong about. Apple has alleged in the past infringements of ridiculous patents. My guess was that this is yet another stupid attempt at restricting common technology or methods.

As for the definition of a patent, I was aware of what it actually means.

RE: What would this be about?
By seamonkey79 on 11/1/2010 2:50:01 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize he was responding to the same post you were responding to, right?

By BastiWebMaster on 11/2/2010 2:09:57 AM , Rating: 2
Now I do. My bad.

"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki