 No cyber security legislation expected from 111th Congress
111th Congress ends in December
Much
of the critical infrastructures of developed nations like the U.S.
depend on computer and network systems to operate and communicate.
Hackers from nefarious nations and those who hack for fun can get
into some of these critical systems potentially causing a security
threat to the country.
In an effort to give the president the
power to combat any pending or existing cyber threat that could
threaten critical infrastructure around the country, Congress and
some lawmakers are looking to pass a new legislation that would give
the president power to shut down some sections of the internet during
an attack or under the threat of an attack. With the 111th congress
ending in December, lawmakers don’t
expect to see any legislation on cyber security passed this
year.
Republican staff director on the Senate Intelligence
Committee Louis Tucker said, "I'm not optimistic of major cyber
security legislation passing at this late time." Tucker also
stated during a cyber security discussion at the Heritage Foundations
think tank, "Considering the objections to some of the cyber
bills out there, comprehensive legislation will probably have to wait
until next year."
The controversial cyber security
legislation that has some privacy advocates up in arms is sponsored
by Sens. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Tom
Carper, D-Del. The problem that ACLU legislative counsel Michelle
Richardson has with the legislation - dubbed the
Lieberman-Collins-Carper bill - is that it doesn't specify the powers
it wants to grant to the president in times of crisis. Defense
News
reports that the legislation states, "[The president would be
granted] emergency measures to protect the nation's most critical
infrastructure if a cyber vulnerability is being exploited or is
about to be exploited."
Aids to the Senators sponsoring
the bill say that the bill "does not authorize the government to
take over critical infrastructure."
Richardson says,
"[The Obama Administration must] disclose what authority it
thinks it already has [before the new legislation can be
considered]."
The bill reportedly seeks to defend
critical networks with real-time monitoring capabilities and to
establish security requirements for private sector networks.
Companies that operate private networks would be required to notify
the government of significant breaches. The information on the
breaches would then be shared by the government with other network
operators. The upside to reporting the breaches by operators of
private networks would be liability protection. Despite no
legislation to provide the president with powers to fight cyber
threats, the DoD is ramping
up its capability to defend against cyber threats.
"I want people to see my movies in the best formats possible. For [Paramount] to deny people who have Blu-ray sucks!" -- Movie Director Michael Bay
|
Most Popular ArticlesMicrosoft Xbox One: More Expensive, More DRM, and Slower Than PS4 June 11, 2013, 11:07 AM GigaHertz Wars 2.0? AMD Releases World's First 5.0 GHz FX Processor June 11, 2013, 3:16 PM Xbox Chief: If You Can't Get Online, Don't Buy an Xbox One June 12, 2013, 9:57 AM Source: Don't Worry, NSA Spies on "99 Percent" of Americans' Locations, Call Records June 14, 2013, 3:57 PM Former Palm CEO: Selling Palm to HP was a Waste June 12, 2013, 10:19 AM
|