backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by bigbrent88.. on Oct 29 at 10:41 AM


No cyber security legislation expected from 111th Congress
111th Congress ends in December

Much of the critical infrastructures of developed nations like the U.S. depend on computer and network systems to operate and communicate. Hackers from nefarious nations and those who hack for fun can get into some of these critical systems potentially causing a security threat to the country.

In an effort to give the president the power to combat any pending or existing cyber threat that could threaten critical infrastructure around the country, Congress and some lawmakers are looking to pass a new legislation that would give the president power to shut down some sections of the internet during an attack or under the threat of an attack. With the 111th congress ending in December, lawmakers don’t expect to see any legislation on cyber security passed this year.

Republican staff director on the Senate Intelligence Committee Louis Tucker said, "I'm not optimistic of major cyber security legislation passing at this late time." Tucker also stated during a cyber security discussion at the Heritage Foundations think tank, "Considering the objections to some of the cyber bills out there, comprehensive legislation will probably have to wait until next year."

The controversial cyber security legislation that has some privacy advocates up in arms is sponsored by Sens. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Tom Carper, D-Del. The problem that ACLU legislative counsel Michelle Richardson has with the legislation - dubbed the Lieberman-Collins-Carper bill - is that it doesn't specify the powers it wants to grant to the president in times of crisis.
Defense News reports that the legislation states, "[The president would be granted] emergency measures to protect the nation's most critical infrastructure if a cyber vulnerability is being exploited or is about to be exploited."

Aids to the Senators sponsoring the bill say that the bill "does not authorize the government to take over critical infrastructure."

Richardson says, "[The Obama Administration must] disclose what authority it thinks it already has [before the new legislation can be considered]."

The bill reportedly seeks to defend critical networks with real-time monitoring capabilities and to establish security requirements for private sector networks. Companies that operate private networks would be required to notify the government of significant breaches. The information on the breaches would then be shared by the government with other network operators. The upside to reporting the breaches by operators of private networks would be liability protection. Despite no legislation to provide the president with powers to fight cyber threats, the DoD is ramping up its capability to defend against cyber threats.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just what the world needs...
By brotj7 on 10/28/2010 11:31:47 AM , Rating: 2
Correct me if I'm wrong here, I thought ICANN already blocks assaulting domains when requested. What gives these people the idea that they can give a sole country control a worldwide asset. This just gives the UN another stone to throw at ICANN, and puts closed off nations who censor their populace a step closer to having a say in the freedom of the net.




"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki