Print 117 comment(s) - last by JKflipflop98.. on Nov 6 at 8:52 PM

Mac users are now at risky of getting a nasty virus.  (Source: Listmania)

If it you approve, you are a sad noob, and your Mac is infected.  (Source: Intego)
Mac: Hi PC, I'm not feeling so hot today... PC: Oh, I know ALL about that. I think you have a virus!

Security experts by and large agree that security via obscurity is not a wise model for protecting customers over the long term.  That's exactly the model Apple has employed successfully for some time now.  However, its luck finally appears to be running short.

Hot on the heels of a newly discovered iOS exploit that allows access to locked iPhones, new reports [1] [2] from security research firms 
SecureFirm and Intego reveals that a new trojan is targeting Mac users using a vulnerability in OS X's Java player.

According to the 
Intego report the new malware, trojan.osx.boonana.a, is really a reworked version of the Koobface malware, which has attacked Windows in the past.  The malware acts as a worm when it spreads and as a trojan when it is infecting your computer.

Users may encounter the worm via links posted on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other websites.  When clicking the link, the applet attempts to run.  Users can stop the infection before it starts by denying the applet permission to run when OS X's Java player pops up a dialogue.

If they allow the applet to run, they may get another warning if they have a Mac antispyware program like VirusBarrier X6’s Anti-Spyware installed.  If they don't get the warning, or choose to disregard it, the applet will attempt to make a connection with a remote server and installs a rootkit, backdoor, command and control, and other elements.  These files are copied to an invisible folder -- .jnana -- in the user's home directory.

If the virus is allowed to carry out its infection process, the unsuspecting Mac user may find themselves part of a botnet.  When they log on social networks, the virus will post links to spread the infection.  It may also send spam e-mail via their logged-in accounts

Other variants of this virus target Windows and Linux, making it a rare true cross-platform virus.  All these viruses share the fact that they use the Java player as a route of attack.  According to 
Intego, other OS X-specific versions of the virus have shown up, but most are broken or try to connect to offline servers.

The malware could become potentially more dangerous in the future if it is able to eliminate the warnings from the Java player and/or change the name/location of the infection directory, making it hard for virus removal software to find it.

While it does not appear that this virus takes advantage of any unique flaws in Apple's version of Java, some security experts say that Apple's Java player may have more vulnerabilities than Window's.  That's because Apple makes its own Java player, which according to an e-mailreportedly attributed to Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs, is always a version behind the official Linux/Windows builds from Sun and Oracle.

Apple is reportedly considering ditching its Java player in future versions of OS X, such as OS X 10.7 "Lion".  Similarly it's considering rejecting Flash, another multimedia web technology.  Ultimately these efforts may eliminate some routes of attack, but now that Apple is being targeted it must realize -- there is 
always a back door.


Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By Tony Swash on 10/28/2010 10:43:28 AM , Rating: -1
I will repeat once again this time in bold - show me an example of a single mac that has been compromised.

Lots of guff, bluster, and sensationalist cheap journalism won't change the reality.

It's Windows that is the security disaster and not Mac.

Really, really irritating for you guys. As Philip K. Dick said "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".

I should be able to install whatever i want on my own computer. I will not be told what i can and can not install by jobs or anyone else. Doing away with java and flash is retarded and shouldn't be job's choice to make. If they don't want to put it on by default that's one thing but block me from installing it is insane!

You can install Flash and Java on your Mac. It's just that Apple is stopping putting Flash on macs and leaving it up to end users to install, and is stopping building it's own Java implementaion but leaving the door open for third parties to do so. Sounds like more choice to me.

No Flash on the iPhone and iPad is feature not a bug.

If you don't own Apple products why are you getting in a such a froth about all this? And if you do own Apple products I assume it's because you want to and thus the advantages of Apple's product design, for you, out weigh the shortcomings. Either way please stop whining.

By inighthawki on 10/28/2010 10:52:05 AM , Rating: 3
It's Windows that is the security disaster and not Mac.

lol, are you basing that off of anything? Or do you simply mean to say that since Windows was at one point insecure that it is just as, and always will be, insecure?

Try reading up on the latest news. /

Then we have articles like
where the author gives no evidence of the code in OSX being more secure than Windows, just false arguments like "OSX disables services that may allow for vulnerability", which I hope I don't have to explain how that is not better security.

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By Tony Swash on 10/28/10, Rating: -1
By Luticus on 10/28/2010 12:09:59 PM , Rating: 2
I'm in the process of finding a test machine now that i can infect.

By inighthawki on 10/28/2010 12:16:57 PM , Rating: 2
So you're saying that some of the lead security experts who develop hacks for a living don't count as a valid reference? Wow, what are you expecting, a complete run down of each OSs source code and analysis by a dozen third parties?

By gamerk2 on 10/28/2010 12:31:35 PM , Rating: 3
Your statement is provablly false: My sisters Mac got infected.

Your argument also ignores the fact there are 10x the Windows PCs on the market; of COURSE they will have more PC's infected by some virus or another. Likewise, PC's, having the larger user base, is a far more tempting target for people creating viruses.

Now that Macs are gaining share, combined with their piss-poor anti-virus measures, you will see Macs get exploited far more. I'm saying this as a programmer who regularlly attends confrences where your precious platform is laid open for us to play with. Macs have about as much security today as Windows ME had when it released. The only difference is that the people who create viruses tend to ignore your platform. That doesn't make it safe.

By fsardis on 10/28/2010 1:05:57 PM , Rating: 3

oh so much fun... this one is cross platform too and unpatched.
so if OSX is so superior, how come it is not immune?

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By Akrovah on 10/28/2010 10:59:54 AM , Rating: 3
No Flash on the iPhone and iPad is LIMITATION, not a feature.

And no, no one is able to show you an actual example on an infected Mac because most of the people here are smart enough to avoid such things, however, as there are actually screen shots of this thing in effect, or at least the warnings that pop up when it tries to install (and you know some people are going to be stupid enough to click Yes. It will just happen, there is no sense denying it) I think it makes it pretty clear that it CAN and WILL happen.

By bakupon on 10/28/2010 11:05:02 AM , Rating: 2
maybe soon jobs will ban java for ios

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By Luticus on 10/28/2010 11:37:27 AM , Rating: 3
show me an example of a single mac that has been compromised
Give me a little while and i'll get one infected just for you.

Windows that is the security disaster and not Mac
talk about a false sense of reality... Windows isn't perfect, we all get that... you apparently are having trouble understanding that neither is your candy coated mac!

You can install Flash and Java on your Mac
for now... but will it remain that way forever?

No Flash on the iPhone and iPad is feature not a bug.
i disagree. removing software from a device because your device can't handle it is not a feature. again i should have the choice to install it!

If you don't own Apple products why are you getting in a such a froth
i'm posting this from a macbook pro running osx 10.6.

if you do own Apple products I assume it's because you want to
Assuming didn't work out for you this time. The macbook is my work computer because we actually support about 150 of them along side our windows 7 support. I elected to assist in the mac side of the support because i and one of my coworkers know the most about them. Thus to help us support the platform we were giving macs with virtual machines for windows support. I still prefer windows in EVERY way and i live in my virtual environment because mac is WAY to confining and doesn't support simple things that i need and/or like.

Either way please stop whining.

You're mistaking my laughter for whining... My apologies, perhaps i should laugh louder so you can tell the difference.

By earlgpz750 on 10/28/2010 12:07:59 PM , Rating: 2
Wow - Fanboy -
To show an example of an infected Mac is like asking for every single Mac Owner to Come to one site and log yes or no if they have it.

Look there are reasons why an individual wouldnt show on a site that they are infected. Jobs will come knocking down the door or some how have that retracted.

Reality is , some people are not that smart and may not come forward with an infection 1) Cause they dont know 2) Dont know that they should report to THIS FORUM

Get over your self with MAC and realize the truth "If it is made by man, it can be broken by man"

That being said, no matter what you say that Mac is more secure is a matter of perspective not reality.

Sure Windows has its flaws, but there is no perfect software OS out there that will be flexible and user (non technical) friendly.

I have been an admin and support for many people so I have seen everyday users and understand thier concerns and seen their habits and usage.

Heres another thought: a Large US company gets their security punched though many layers before they ever shut it of and change connections. But they never advertise that? Why because its bad publicity. So why dont you ask all companies to tell you their security flaws instead of looking for 1 little MAC device?

Again in BOLD for you Tony and your reading pleasure "If it is made by man, it can be broken by man"

Also remember before Jobs kept saying Windows 95/98 should be an "OPEN PLATFORM" and give users the rights to install what they want. All of a sudden he is locking down his OS. Geez,so in one breath he says open system, now that his market share is growing and the false sense of security, he locks and says Yay or Nay to what can and cannot be installed or preloaded?

I own mac and windows lol ironiclly my Macbook Pro is my fastest WINDOWS7 system.

so judging from your remarks here on the forum, you are Job Cult follower and believe everything he says is truth. Mac Evangelistic marketing is fine for competition, but seriously; defending them is honorable outside the fact you think MAC is still Virus Proof.

RE: More pleasing fantasies for the truly insecure
By testerguy on 10/28/10, Rating: -1
By Luticus on 10/28/2010 12:44:22 PM , Rating: 3
Give ME a little while and I'll show you that you still haven#t got one infected
working on it... i'll let you know when/if it gets infected and the steps to remove it. Just gotta find a test machine that i can image. I'll probably get it done after work if my "workload" permits.

Nobody is claiming OSX is perfect.
HAH, talk to tony and many more like him/her for about 5 seconds....

The simply fact is that it's more secure than Windows
i disagree, the ONLY thing "more secure" about mac (if this even still counts) is that it's based on bsd and thus has a stronger security model by default than windows, windows is made the flawed structure go away with the introduction of UAC which emulates the linux/unix root/user account privileged system.

It's still less prone to be the subject of viruses
nobody is arguing that windows doesn't get more viruses... that's unanimously true.


Do you know the answer to this question? For any platform? No. Most irrelevant point of the day.
trends in the iphone/ipod/ipad world are pointing to the fact that apple is moving toward this. It could be incorrect but i wouldn't put it past them.

due to the fact that the use of flash on any device impacts on performance and battery life in an unacceptable way.
if you run flash on an "as needed basis" like i do on my windows phone then the impact is not nearly as bad.

Well, what a ridiculous coincidence. You know the 'most' about macs whilst also believing all of the criticisms you stated above, I wonder where you gained such knowledge.
i got my skills with mac from a combination of virtualization, linux/unix knowledge that i apply to the mac platform, a friend who owns a mac which i used to study the platform, and through demoing mac computers at mac stores. Among other places, not to mention i have this uncanny ability to "read"... and there are plenty of places on the internet with mac documentation.

Surely you didn't gain that knowledge by not buying such inferior products? What does that say about your decisions? Or more accurately, about your honesty.
To date i have owned/posessed only 2 devices made by apple. the first was an ipod shuffle that was given to me for christmas which broke a long time ago (it was a software problem that i quit fixing, no i did not sabotage it) and the second is my current macbook pro that i did not, nor ever would, pay for. As for my honesty, i think that i'm fairly honest about my knowledge/skills/devices owned.

i don't hate apple devices, i hate the smug customer base and it's lie driven marketing... granted the marketing aspect seems to be going away now.

Look at all the posts on here, people overjoyed that a virus has the potential to infect a system
i am not overjoyed that a virus has the potential to hurt people or their systems, i was overjoyed that there may have been some slight chance these smug pricks who think their overpriced computers are better than mine because theirs were build by apple's outsourcing and mine was built by me and runs windows...

I am currently in the process of testing this virus and hopefully will be able to develop a fix or at least a guide on detection and removal if it warrants it.

You know the 'most' about macs whilst also believing all of the criticisms you stated above

I am a regular user of many different operating systems to include all windows 7 and below, windows server 2003 - 2008, debian, fadora, kubuntu, ubuntu, mandriva/mandrake, mint, osx .0 - .6, windows mobile, and ios... the criticisms i stated anywhere on here (besides where i'm being clearly sarcastic just to get a few laughs) are not something i just believe, but know to be 100% true. There are just as many issues regarding mac as there are windows. they might be about different things but there are issues none-the-less, that much i can assure you of.

i have no hate for my macbook pro, i just prefer Windows/Debain to it 100%.

Say what you like... unless you're a tech who knows his stuff you won't stand a chance at discrediting me, and if you are a tech who is in fact good and well informed about all of these platforms then you'll know by reading my posts my credentials are in order. I don't like to brag but i live on all things technology. If you want to argue history you'd probably win, but if there's one thing i know it's computer tech.

By INeedCache on 10/29/2010 10:03:16 AM , Rating: 1
"Talk about a huge sense of insecurity. Nobody is claiming OSX is perfect. The simply fact is that it's more secure than Windows. Whether that's due to the fact that it's less of a target or not, is irrelevant. It's still less prone to be the subject of viruses."

Do you realize just how nonsensical that statement is? You're saying it's more secure than Windows, yet the fact that it's much less of a target is irrelevant. The fact that it's much less of a target is TOTALLY relevant, as without it being on about equal footing as far a marketshare and being targeted, you, nor anyone else, can back up the claim it's more secure than Windows.

You also mention an unnatural hatred amongst some for all things Apple. That may be. But you should also then mention the unnatural feeling of superiority most Apple users exhibit toward any and all competitors. People overjoyed that a computer could get infected? Well, what do you expect when the Apple Kool-Aid gulpers weigh in on any and every article regarding Windows infections with their typical superior, smug attitude "It can't happen to us." It certainly CAN happen to them. Forgot to mention that. Or do you expect human nature to be one-sided?

Is OSX more secure than Windows 7? You can believe and claim whatever you wish. But the FACT is we will never know, as it will never come close to achieving the market share necessary for even a loose comparison. If you believe otherwise, your illogic is even worse than displayed here in this more or less laughable diatribe.

"We basically took a look at this situation and said, this is bullshit." -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng's take on patent troll Soverain

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki