backtop


Print 83 comment(s) - last by TimberJon.. on Nov 1 at 11:01 PM


The HULC exoskeleton is almost unnoticable at first and feels natural for the soldier, yet it massively enhances their physical capabilities.  (Source: Lockheed Martin)

The suit allows soldiers to effortlessly carry more defensive or offensive tools, like bulletproof steel shields, heavier guns, or extra body armor.  (Source: Lockheed Martin)

Soldiers can lift up to 200 pounds with the HULC.  (Source: Lockheed Martin)
Bring on the mech wars

For those yearning for some good old fashioned mech wars, your hopes may be realized on a battlefront in the near future.

To complement combat airshipslasersdrones, and a variety of other exotic "future weapons", Lockheed Martin is looking to outfit soldiers with powerful exoskeletons that would greatly amplify their physical movements and turn them into resilient angels of death.

Dubbed the Human Universal Load Carrier, or HULC, Lockheed Martin has supplemented a $1.1M USD contract with much private investment to try to sell the military on the idea of combat exoskeletons.

Lockheed Martin recently shared details on the progress of the suit with 
Wired.  The HULC in its current form weighs 82 lbs, but when the solider straps in, they feel virtually nothing.  It could in theory support an impressive array of strap-on combat accessories such as missile launchers or a massive 94-pound black steel shield capable of stopping most munitions dead in their tracks (Lockheed Martin has only demonstrated non-weapon accessories like the shield, but said that it should be capable of being weaponized).

The agile outfit is fully "ruggedized" and waterproof.  It can withstand billowing sand and dust, as is commonly present in the Middle East.  Its lithium-ion battery pack can power a 20 km (12.5 mile) march on a single charge.  The suit can travel at 7 miles per hour, faster than a brisk walk, and fast enough to keep up with a slow-traveling tank (tanks top out typically at around 40 mph, but frequently travel much slower when performing tactical or support maneuvers).

The suit allows the soldier to effortlessly lift 200 lb -- far more than an average private sans suit could ever dream of.  And the battery pack weighs only 18 lbs, is rechargeable via Humvee electrical connections, and holds charge for three to four days.

The suit is amazingly flexible allowing you to stand up from a prone or kneeling position rapidly, and without putting almost any weight on the soldier's joints.

Going ahead Lockheed Martin wants to further seal off the unit's hydraulic and electronic systems from the elements and from undesirable electric emissions, which could give away your location.

In the spring of 2011, the exoskeleton will enjoy its first tests by real soldiers in the U.S. military.  And in 2012 Lockheed Martin will test the exosuits in Afghanistan.  The feedback from those tests will probably determine whether the U.S. Armed Forces get serious about investing in the technology.

Lockheed's long-time rival Raytheon is making a competitive model dubbed the XOS 2.

Regardless of which model triumphs, the U.S. Military would be wise to promote this technology.  After all, soldiers are soft and organic, and thus vulnerable to improvised explosive devices and armor-piercing rounds.  It's hard to carry enough body armor to change that fact.  An exoskeleton could not only provide greater protection against these threats, but it could prove a fearsome offensive weapon.  The sight of a legion of heavily armored mech soldiers supported by tanks charging towards them would be enough to send most enemies running from the battlefield.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Satellite link... established.
By MrBlastman on 10/26/2010 11:04:09 AM , Rating: 3
Reactor... online. Weapons... online. Sensors... online. All systems... nominal.

*beep*

We are one step closer to having true elementals or battle suits. Get us there and we'll be even closer to finally having big, giant robots wreaking havoc on the battlefields.

I for one hope for the oncoming conquest of our nuclear-powered, bipedal robotic overlords.




RE: Satellite link... established.
By Reclaimer77 on 10/26/2010 11:16:50 AM , Rating: 2
lol yeah.

Big giant mechs would be more feasible at this point because they would be large enough to house a reactor of some type to power it. Man sized suits? Not so much.


RE: Satellite link... established.
By lyeoh on 10/26/2010 2:45:14 PM , Rating: 2
It's easier to hide a human than it is to hide a giant mech. Better to have a superhuman that's human sized.

For war stuff you'd be better off using a conventional tank than a giant mech.


RE: Satellite link... established.
By MrBlastman on 10/26/2010 3:19:57 PM , Rating: 5
Blasphemy! There are multiple advantages of a giant robot over a tank:

1. Rocket fists. Tranzor Z (Mazinger Z) clearly demonstrates this advantage. The detachable saucer car in his head is just an added bonus and the eye beams, well, lets just say he can peek over a cliff and fry anything in sight. Mazinkaiser is even more deadly, btw.

2. Big robots can step on things, tanks can't. That's right, when a tank runs out of ammo, it can just run over things--except big robots. Rock paper scissors here, big robot wins with no ammo and tank is squished. Rock is trumped by paper.

3. Tanks aren't nuclear powered. Need I say more?

4. Mechs have neurohelmets. Tanks don't.

5. Mechs have jump jets and some of them--like the mighty Veritech, can transform into a plane and per the tale of the great Thexder, triumph over all sorts of mechanical menaces.

6. Mechs can walk on all sorts of terrain a tank has no business, nor any ability, to traverse. Not only this but a Mech can enter a river or lake and still fire back while partially submerged, using the liquid as a means to reduce heat from their core structure.

7. This is the most important advantage of all--Mech's are cooler! They're just neato.

So there. ;)


RE: Satellite link... established.
By DM0407 on 10/26/2010 3:39:22 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Blasphemy! There are multiple advantages of a giant robot over a tank:


I think this should be one of the quotes at the bottom of Daily Tech articles.


RE: Satellite link... established.
By Murst on 10/26/2010 4:02:26 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
That's right, when a tank runs out of ammo, it can just run over things--except big robots.

A big tank can run over big robots.

quote:
Tanks aren't nuclear powered.

If a giant robot can be nuclear powered, I don't really understand why a tank can't be either. Both would probably need to be remote controlled, but nothing states that a tank must actually carry people.

quote:
Mechs can walk on all sorts of terrain a tank has no business, nor any ability, to traverse.

I'm sure that you can also find terrain that a mech can't go into but a tank can.

quote:
Not only this but a Mech can enter a river or lake and still fire back while partially submerged, using the liquid as a means to reduce heat from their core structure.

Tanks can fire while being partially submerged.


RE: Satellite link... established.
By MrBlastman on 10/26/2010 4:16:01 PM , Rating: 4
/nerd fight

There are currently no tanks on earth that can run over a mech that is 17 meters tall. Even if it were Getter Robot and not a traditional Battletech or Macross mech, the tank would still fail as Getter is 20 - 55 meters tall (depending on the model and if it is a Shin-variant).

quote:
If a giant robot can be nuclear powered, I don't really understand why a tank can't be either. Both would probably need to be remote controlled, but nothing states that a tank must actually carry people.


If the tank were robot controlled, then maybe. If it isn't, though, it can't be as there just isn't enough room. In a battlemech, the reactor is in the mid-torso, while the pilot is situated above it or in the head. The tank just doesn't have enough room as the main surviving principle behind a tank is:

a. Thick, canted armor to deflect shells
b. Low-profile to create a smaller visual presence in the background and on the horizon.

A tank that can be seen is a tank waiting to be stepped on!

quote:
I'm sure that you can also find terrain that a mech can't go into but a tank can.


I'm not sure of any but if you come up with something, please let me know. A mech particularly has an advantage on steeper, rocky inclines that a tank can't hope to keep up on.

quote:
Tanks can fire while being partially submerged.


Maybe in 6 - 8 feet of water but not 15 - 20 feet.

Look, just concede. Mechs are k-rad, dude.

/nerd fight


By MrBungle123 on 10/27/2010 10:51:46 AM , Rating: 2
What If instead of a tank we build Fatboys? You know like the ones in Supcom - giant tanks the size of a city block that contain a factory to construct other fighting vehicles where ever it is and have turrets with giant naval guns like on battleships? What happens to you mech now?


RE: Satellite link... established.
By Alexvrb on 10/29/2010 10:19:31 PM , Rating: 2
I dunno man, Hover Tanks are pretty badass. They're not as versatile as Veritechs, though.

Of course, the real cat's meow is an SDF or two.


By TimberJon on 11/1/2010 9:35:29 PM , Rating: 2
<BT nerd clarifications>

Referencing the more physics-based Battletech 'verse...

>'Mechs are supposed to have an armor that can for the most part, deflect most if not part of the kinetic energy from a now-conventional tank round.

> Their vantage point puts normal tanks in far better range.
Yea if they can see you you can see them but the 'mech might be moving too. I don't know if tank's targeting computers gather range data on objects with sky in the background. It won't be easy to hit the legs of a 'mech. Tank can't see over a short wall, and cant knock it down for fear of the enemy noticing. A 'mech can see easily over a short wall though it would need high cover to hide itself behind.

> Noting the Hatchetman's design, a 'mech with limbs able to torque tons worth of weight fairly effortlessly, even if clumsily slow to our eyes, can hold physical weapons that can do plenty of damage after ammo reserves are out.

> A true 'Mech wouldn't work without some kind of miniaturized reactor. Even though an ICE engine or two MIGHT be able to produce enough power for mobility OR weapons (excluding energy weapons, sorry).. Fuel is a concern. High output energy source = some kind of energy weapon. Ballistics are practical with limited ammo, but having a nearly unlimited power source and no energy weapons that require no ammo would be stupid. Unless the source of energy could barely power mobility, computers, life support, etc.. =\ Whatever that is give it the boot and plug something better in.

> Tanks have far less mobility. They can't turn as easily, and the turret can only traverse up so far. A 'Mech can get up on a hill or outcropping and rain hell downward. A Tank would need to half fall off a cliff to aim downwards.

> A tank can use 'jump jets' to go over a ravine or really ugly terrain, but I believe those were plasma rockets that fed on water or something else for thrust. According to BT design, a bipedal 'mech should be able to keep it's balance pretty good even on uneven ground.

> A tank could dig itself a hole with it's treads in loose soil or mud if it is wet enough. A 'mech might slip and fall but it can get back up albeit slowly and maybe with some damage. A 'mech might also just be able to stomp through mud as it's weight should always carry it down far enough to hit the bottom. It is stepping while the tank is chewing.

> Yay a tank can fire partially submerged. A 'mech can fire completely submerged though it isn't practical. What is practical is crossing a body of water, underwater. Works great for ambushes too. Element of surprise a conventional tank (not a specialized tank) can't accomplish.

> what else what else... Oh yes. Lighter armor, significantly more movement-power means more armaments. Miles-per-gallon is the key, if there isnt any, then the combat life of the unit is greatly increased.

That's all I can think of. We will likely have spacecraft before 'Mechs though. Air mobility might take over. BT Universe unfortunately was built around the dream of ground-based 'Mechs and had to make up reasons why they dominated where air power should have. On the other side.. no matter how much air power you have... you always need ground troops. why not 20-40 foot tall kinds.

The future is iter.org
Though we need that myomer too atm.

</BT nerd clarifications>


RE: Satellite link... established.
By DougF on 10/26/2010 6:10:57 PM , Rating: 2
I'll see your giant robot and raise you a....BOLO MkXXX.


By Captain Orgazmo on 10/26/2010 6:36:07 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking this was a serious post, until I got to "rocket fists" (for some reason the "blasphemy" failed to tip me off). Thanks for the laugh :)


RE: Satellite link... established.
By Alexvrb on 10/29/2010 10:16:43 PM , Rating: 2
*BWEEEP*

Heat level critical!


RE: Satellite link... established.
By phantom505 on 10/26/10, Rating: 0
RE: Satellite link... established.
By MrBlastman on 10/26/2010 2:39:18 PM , Rating: 2
If you hate America so bad why don't you just leave? We won't miss you. :)

We like our capitalism and FYI, the F-22 is a complete utter success. It is an amazing accomplishment of Lockheed. If you don't believe me, go watch one fly in person--you'll change your mind.

The F-35 might of had a chance, if those in Congress weren't so bent on cutting funding for the new engine it desperately needs to remain viable.

Oh, and also FYI, the F-15 and the F-16 have been complete, utter successes. Nothing has managed to shoot down an F-15, it is undefeated.


RE: Satellite link... established.
By phantom505 on 10/26/2010 11:57:38 PM , Rating: 2
What did my post have to do with hating America? I spent 2 years on active duty and I know how the brass in the Pentagon thinks. Obviously you don't.

Furthermore, I love the country. That's why I want to see it succeed. If anything it's you who hate it and want to sell it to the corporations, or w/e it is you think it is you believe.

F-22 is to fight which enemy that the F-15 can't handle? Hmmmm.....? You just said.... never mind. Logic is not your strong suit.


By MrBlastman on 10/27/2010 9:13:04 AM , Rating: 3
I may have wrongly assumed you hated America but in some of your other posts--particularly those supporting socialization (nationalized health care), it is those very ideals which threaten to rip America apart and turn it into Europe.

We're Americans, we don't want to be Europeans. How so? We kind of left there over 200 years ago to get away from all of that! :)

quote:
F-22 is to fight which enemy that the F-15 can't handle? Hmmmm.....? You just said.... never mind. Logic is not your strong suit.


If you live in utopia, you might say that since the F-15 has never been defeated, it never will and it is perfect. The reality is, around the world, _right now_ there are other nations rapidly trying to develop new, next-generation fighters which have stealth capabilities which will render the F-15 obsolete.

If we have the F-22 now, we are prepared for them in the future. You were in the Military, don't they teach you something similar to the Boy Scout motto there--Be Prepared.

If we were prepared for 9/11, it might never have happened. Lets be prepared for the worst the enemy can throw at us before it happens.


By phantom505 on 10/26/2010 11:59:40 PM , Rating: 2
PS

Freeper Boards are ---------------->


RE: Satellite link... established.
By WayneG on 10/26/2010 5:50:19 PM , Rating: 2
this is Rooster...


"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki