backtop


Print 26 comment(s) - last by SPOOFE.. on Oct 20 at 7:30 PM


A leaked shot of the upcoming Macbook Air shows a smaller footprint, courtesy of a shrunk down 11.6 inch screen.  (Source: Engadget)
New ultra-light shrinks the screen and adds SD card reader, extra USB port

It has been virtually confirmed that a new Macbook Air, as rumored, will be unveiled at Apple's"Back to Mac" event later today.  As first reported at Polish tech news site Spider's Web, Apple created forum topics to guide the event discussion and unwittingly tipped its hand a bit early.

Forum topics include "MBA" (Macbook Air), iLife '11, and a mystery "reserved" product.  The reserved product is rumored to be the next major release of Apple's operating system, OS X, which sources indicate will be named "Lion".

But even better, 
Engadget is claiming to have scooped the specs of the new Apple laptop from an unnamed source.

If the site's source is to believe the new laptop is starring in "Honey I Shrunk the Screens" with the diagonal dropping from 13.3-in. to 11.6-in.  Might Apple consider hanging onto its 13-in. model as a second option as well?  No one knows.

The new smaller-screen model will be smaller in footprint and lighter, but will remain relatively the same thickness.  It bumps the base level processor speed to a 2.13GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (with a 2.33GHz option).  The real disappointment is that the memory reportedly remains unchanged at lowly 2 GB (hopefully a 4 GB option is available).

The laptop adds an extra USB port (bringing the grand total to two), meaning that you can finally use a USB wireless mouse 
and an optical drive.  And it is reportedly adding an SD card reader.

Still undisclosed is whether the laptop might get a GPU upgrade.  The current generation packs a integrated NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics processor with 256 MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory -- not very exciting.  Dedicated memory for the GPU with a better discrete mobile chip would be a nice place to start.

So far little information has leaked on OS X "Lion", though there is plenty of speculation.  The MacBook Air was last refreshed more than a year ago, in June 2009.  Stay tuned at 1 PM EST, as
DailyTech will be providing coverage of Apple's product launch.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

USB Wireless Mouse?
By wgm on 10/20/2010 11:07:08 AM , Rating: 1
"The laptop adds an extra USB port (bringing the grand total to two), meaning that you can finally use a USB wireless mouse and an optical drive."

A wireless mouse shouldn't require an additional USB port. Every portable Mac for YEARS has come with bluetooth built-in, so this use-case is fairly irrelevant. Nice touch, though...it reminds me why tech journalists are so valuable.




RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By zorxd on 10/20/2010 11:20:06 AM , Rating: 1
and bluetooth mice are always 3x more expansive, at best


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By ChuckDriver on 10/20/2010 11:54:17 AM , Rating: 2
Bluetooth mice are more expensive, but so is the MacBook Air. Those buyers are willing to pay more to not have a dongle protruding from the side of their laptops. Apple will also sell them the mouse and an expensive set of rechargeable batteries with a charger designed according to Apple's principles.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By SPOOFE on 10/20/2010 5:01:11 PM , Rating: 2
So because it's expensive, you can only use expensive peripherals for it? Nonsense. Two USB ports is a good thing. Why get your panties in a knot over it?


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By ChuckDriver on 10/20/2010 6:26:06 PM , Rating: 2
When did I say that two USB ports were not a good thing? When did I say that you could only use expensive peripherals?

I didn't say that at all.

As I pointed out, you could still use an RF mouse with the old single USB port MacBook Air. Also that if you could afford a MacBook Air, that the additional premium of a Bluetooth mouse over an RF mouse becomes less significant.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By SPOOFE on 10/20/10, Rating: 0
RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By kingius on 10/20/2010 11:47:08 AM , Rating: 2
Many, many people use USB mice and not Bluetooth ones.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By MrTeal on 10/20/2010 11:59:22 AM , Rating: 2
I have to assume he meant wired mouse. I actually much prefer the wired mice, it always just works as opposed to a BT one that always seems to have its batteries die at the most inopportune time.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By inighthawki on 10/20/2010 12:15:49 PM , Rating: 2
I doubt it, there are plenty of wireless usb-based mice. Not all wireless mice are bluetooth. A lot come with wireless receivers of their own and use RF.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By MrTeal on 10/20/2010 12:40:51 PM , Rating: 2
Good point, many use a dongle and RF. If that's the case though, why qualify it at all? Any USB mouse is going to require a USB port, whether it's wired or wireless.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By Smilin on 10/20/2010 1:03:12 PM , Rating: 5
So wireless mouse vs bluetooth mouse... all the discussions below are missing the bigger point.

The damn thing only has two USB ports for *any* use. That brings it on par with the sh1ttiest netbooks/laptops on the market.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By omnicronx on 10/20/2010 1:07:11 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure he made a mistake, but so did you.

Wireless is traditionally associated with RF, not bluetooth.

A lot of people still use wireless keyboards and mice.

Furthermore, this was not the underlying issue. If you wanted to use an external mouse (whether it be USB/Wireless USB dongle etc) and any other device at the same time, it was not possible.

That means in order to use a simple item like a USB stick, or as the article mentions, external DVD drive, you would have to remove the mouse.

One USB port in this day and age is not acceptable, and thus Apples decision to add another. Many people found this to be the biggest issue with their Mac Air.


RE: USB Wireless Mouse?
By SPOOFE on 10/20/2010 5:00:14 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
A wireless mouse shouldn't require an additional USB port.

But many do. The vast majority. And it's a fact that the single-USB MBA's couldn't use both a USB wireless mouse and an optical drive at the same time without a hub. I can't figure out why you'd even want to argue that point.


High Powered Netbook
By AdamTurney on 10/20/2010 11:57:42 AM , Rating: 2
Based on the specs and screen size of the new Macbook Air, it would seem it is just a glorified Netbook...which I recall Apple saying something about how they don't create junk like that. Maybe shrinking the size of the screen will help save some money so they can compete with Netbooks which will do the same thing as the Air.




RE: High Powered Netbook
By Pirks on 10/20/2010 12:07:33 PM , Rating: 2
Don't you pretend that CULV notebook is the same as Atom crap based netbook.


RE: High Powered Netbook
By headbox on 10/20/2010 2:18:46 PM , Rating: 2
Look at you, criticizing a rumored spec. LOL!


RE: High Powered Netbook
By SPOOFE on 10/20/2010 5:02:53 PM , Rating: 2
"a 2.13GHz Intel Core 2 Duo"

Just LOOK at that crappy netbook processor! Psh!!


This just in: Apple's G5 leaks too!
By Pirks on 10/20/2010 10:58:07 AM , Rating: 4
By omnicronx on 10/20/2010 4:36:56 PM , Rating: 2
LoL..


Going after CULV?
By xthetenth on 10/20/2010 11:40:32 AM , Rating: 2
Is it just me or does going to 11.6 inches look like a windows CULV laptop screen size? It kinda looks like they're trying to go for that niche. Wonder what the thought process behind that decision was if that's true, because it really looks like following in everybody else's footsteps.




RE: Going after CULV?
By SPOOFE on 10/20/2010 5:04:09 PM , Rating: 2
Everybody's putting full-featured Core 2 Duo's in their netbooks? That would be awesome.


Wow....
By ipay on 10/20/2010 12:47:42 PM , Rating: 3
Apple's announcing, yet, more cr@p. No one cares Steve! The only people that seem to care are Apple fan-boys that don't mind throwing away their money for inferior tech.

http://www.TheWorldFrenzy.com




Let me be the first
By Dr of crap on 10/20/10, Rating: -1
RE: Let me be the first
By Luticus on 10/20/2010 10:46:03 AM , Rating: 2
Personally i think it can be kind of fun to spculate and know what the rumors are before the actual event goes down. though it does kind of ruin the "wow" factor a bit if the speculation is accurate due to the "heard it" effect. :)

Though i agree to some extent, i'm not usually one for speculation.


RE: Let me be the first
By chiadog on 10/20/2010 11:09:21 AM , Rating: 2
Although it is fun to speculate, but the "leaked" specs aren't anything worth getting excited over. It seems like it'll be yet another small portable with just enough of computing power, but all Appled up. Since no weight is mentioned, I doubt it'll be much lighter, if at all. Since the Air's introduction, there were plenty of thin and lights made available. Sure they may not be clad in aluminum and carries a fruity logo, but good enough for those who didn't drink the Koolaid / don't want to pay the Apple Tax. I hope more is up Apple's sleeve on this, since this looks too pedestrian for the "I want to look cool at the coffee shop" crowd.


RE: Let me be the first
By Luticus on 10/20/2010 12:14:36 PM , Rating: 3
oh i agree completely. i'm not interested in the devices at all i just thought his jab at the article was a bit on the ridiculous side. seems like any news of anything apple pretty much gets a "why is this news" response lately. I agree that they report on apple crap a bit much but in all fairness the other day engadget had like 20 articles back to back about WP7 and it's various hardware counterparts. if you're going to nitpick the article at least come up with something decent to nitpick about.

just my $0.02 :)


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki