Print 92 comment(s) - last by themaster08.. on Oct 16 at 2:28 AM

Apple now owns 10.6 percent of the U.S. PC market

Detractors of Apple's Mac computers often point to the machines' relatively high price of entry and small market share when looking at the overall PC market (Microsoft still dominates thanks to a plethora of Windows-based machines). However, when compared to other PC manufacturers, Apple is doing quite well (at least in the United States).

The latest statistics from IDC show that Apple has now moved into third place for PC shipments in the U.S. Apple's shipments grew a whopping 24 percent for Q3, which gave Apple 10.6 percent of the market. Dell's shipments actually dropped 4.9 percent giving it a 23.1 percent share of the market, while HP's shipments increased 2.7 percent to give it 24.3 percent of the market and first place overall.

Acer and Toshiba took fourth place and fifth place respectively.

Even though HP and Dell each more than double Apple's U.S. market share, Apple has the high-end covered. Apple owns over 91 percent of the $1,000+ PC market which has helped to fuel its record revenue growth.

"Apple's influence on the PC market continues to grow, particularly in the U.S., as the company's iPad has had some negative impact on the mini-notebook market. But, the halo effect of the device also helped propel Mac sales and moved the company into the number three position in the U.S. market," said Bob O'Donnell, IDC's vice president for Clients and Displays.

When it comes to global sales, Apple doesn't even register in the top six. For Q3, the top global players were HP followed by Acer, Dell, Lenovo, ASUS and Toshiba.

"Despite a sluggish start, the quarter ended with a good rally in September which could be a good prelude for what is ahead," said IDC research analyst Jay Chou. "Lower PC component costs, budding excitement around new media-centric form factors and continued business buying should still make for a competitive holiday season.”

The good news on the Apple front comes on the same day that shares of the stock closed above $300 for the first time in the company's history.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Iaiken on 10/14/2010 10:28:30 AM , Rating: 2
I think it's actually the people who do care about specs who are stupid. Those who care about them but don't understand them certainly are prone to make mistakes, and those who understand, the techies, typically spend unneeded money because of their obsession with specs.

That entirely depends on what you do with it. I am a developer and a gamer and I routinely get all 4 physical cores cooking away at 100% usage for my own code. If I threw my code on a 6-core extreme edition, it would use every ounce of it.

If you're building a PC based purely on your desire to be able to rattle off your specs on every internet forum out there in an attempt to make your penis grow, well then I guess I could agree. However, if you're writing or running code that routinely pushes that hardware to it's limits, then every minute saved is a minute I can spend on something else.

I'm one, I know I bought stuff that was overkill, and that's even though I buy mid-range stuff, not high end.

Woopdeedoo? I'm sorry you have buyers remorse, but the majority of people aren't you.

Most lay people can make do with very limited hardware.

Look, the idea of good-enough computing has basically become a reality. For the vast majority of users, even a crappy dual core atom and an ION can basically suit the needs of the lay-user. It's snappy enough that there is no interface lag, browses the internet, runs office, can stream full motion video in 720i from the net or decode a 1080i blu-ray video seamlessly.

It all boils down to presentation and purchaser habits. Buying a PC is less expensive, but harder to do because the lay-user essentially drowns in a sea of specs. Buying a mac on the other hand is laughably easy, 6 form factors each with an extremely limited range of upgrades. It's easier to do, but it will cost you.

Upgrading an iMac from an i5-760 to an i7-870 costs you $200, actual retail price difference is: $70. That's an almost 300% markup on the upgrade cost, which is AFTER the massive markup on the i5-760 that it is replacing in the first place.

To quote the S-Job, "What? stupid people need computers too, only they gotta pay!"

RE: Here are some of the reasons they are gaining share
By Pirks on 10/14/2010 10:56:46 AM , Rating: 2
Upgrading an iMac from an i5-760 to an i7-870 costs you $200, actual retail price difference is: $70. That's an almost 300% markup on the upgrade cost
Yeah like all the other PC manufacturers like Dell/HP don't do exactly the same. Double standard or you're just child-naive?

By Iaiken on 10/14/2010 2:29:20 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah like all the other PC manufacturers like Dell/HP don't do exactly the same. Double standard or you're just child-naive?

Do you even bother to look up facts before you spout off with bullshit?

Dell: Upgrade from i5-760 to an i7-870 costs you at most $100 (42% markup). On some systems, it's actually a FREE upgrade (-100%).

HP: Upgrade from i5-760 to an i7-870 costs anywhere from $75 (+7%) to $150 (+215%).

Now tell me which of these markups is lower than 300%?

A) 42%
B) -100%
C) 7%
D) 215%
E) All of the above
F) None of the above

You really ARE a moron aren't you?

RE: Here are some of the reasons they are gaining share
By Pirks on 10/14/2010 2:45:12 PM , Rating: 2
Don't be an idiot, of course their markup is slightly lower because their systems are cheaper

By Iaiken on 10/14/2010 4:03:30 PM , Rating: 2
Way to back-peddle Pirks.

do exactly the same

Not only are they NOT exactly the same, they are often SIGNIFICANTLY lower. Often half the cost of the exact same upgrade.

Now I am all for ripping off stupid people and I actually applaud Apple for not only ripping people off, but leaving them happier for it. The old adage that "A fool and his money are soon parted." will be true so long as there are people with more money than brains.

However, if you value your money, Apple products are not for you. My wife was looking to replace her current 24" iMac with a Mac Pro. She doesn't actually need any Apple-specific software for her work so I priced her out a Windows 7 system with the same parts and a 1-week vacation for two in Florence, Italy for the same price as the Mac Pro she wanted. Guess what, we're going to Florence for our Anniversary. :P

RE: Here are some of the reasons they are gaining share
By Pirks on 10/14/2010 5:16:36 PM , Rating: 2
they are often SIGNIFICANTLY lower
Try Sony :P
we're going to Florence for our Anniversary
Yeah no difference between PC and Mac indeed. I too can go to Florence with my wife if I choose self assembled PC over Sony. So what? You'll fail at shoveling Apple around for being "expensive" 'cause I have Sony that I will shovel around too for the same reason. Just give up :)))

By Iaiken on 10/14/2010 5:42:49 PM , Rating: 2
I have Sony

Which is a convenient choice since they don't have any way for you to figure out configure their systems and see what upgrades cost.

“We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone.” -- Steve Jobs

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki