Print 58 comment(s) - last by DKantUno.. on Oct 28 at 3:11 PM

Apple patent not only c-blocks you, but rats you out as well  (Source: Motivated Photos)
Patent outlines a system to block objectionable words and alert other users that the words were used

Apple has one of the most popular smartphones on the market today and as such there are users all around the world that use the device for keeping in contact with loved ones. Many of those people who live a long way from each other undoubtedly use the phone for some racy subject material such as sexting.

Apple has been granted a patent (first applied for in 2008) that is titled "Text-based communication control for personal communication device" according to
Tech Crunch. That sounds rather plebeian until you dig into the subject matter of the patent and realize exactly what the patent does and the opportunity for censorship that will anger some.

The verbiage seems docile and welcome on some levels stating in the background info, "[Currently there is] no way to monitor and control text communications to make them user appropriate. For example, users such as children may send or receive messages (intentionally or not) with parentally objectionable language.”

The patent outlines an application that would allow the parent to determine words that a child using the phone can't send or receive texts that contain those words. The patent also outlines a way that the application could alert other people like parents or administrators in a business setting when patents with these objectionable words are sent using the phone.

The patent reads, "If the control contains unauthorized text, the control application may alert the user, the administrator or other designated individuals of the presence of such text. The control application may require the user to replace the unauthorized text or may automatically delete the text or the entire communication."

It's unclear if the patent will cover a system that automatically censors objectionable words and inserts other words all the time by default or if it is an opt-in service. If the patent is a system that will only allow those who own the devices to set word filters, there will be few parents or network administrators that won’t like the newfound control over how an iPhone can be used. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Dear Apple.
By dflynchimp on 10/13/2010 9:42:03 AM , Rating: 0
Fvck you.

Right in the a55hole with a big rubber dildo which we will then use to violate you cvnt of a mouth after it is all sh!tty and worthy of your face pvssy.

RE: Dear Apple.
By dflynchimp on 10/13/2010 9:49:48 AM , Rating: 1
Sincerely, dflynchimp

no say my name you c0ck sucking sonuvabitch, SAY MY NAME

oh yeah I love it when you talk like that, you jailbird you.

RE: Dear Apple.
By Gio6518 on 10/13/2010 12:09:31 PM , Rating: 2
Reminds me of when the original Napster implemented their filters....

You were getting bands like Metallicrap, motley fool, etc.

RE: Dear Apple.
By VahnTitrio on 10/13/2010 10:08:34 AM , Rating: 2
And spelling like this is how kids will get around that filter. I mean some of these kids' text messages these days you need an interpreter to read.

RE: Dear Apple.
By dflynchimp on 10/13/2010 10:13:28 AM , Rating: 2
True, but DT's filter is pretty lax. I play starcraft 2 and back in the beta they filtered out words like black, white and trans. Even registers TRANSport into %(#)@port lol.

At first I thought you were talking about my other unintentional misspells tho, previews be damned.

RE: Dear Apple.
By FITCamaro on 10/13/2010 10:32:29 AM , Rating: 2
umm....whats offensive about the words black, white and trans?

RE: Dear Apple.
By Anoxanmore on 10/13/2010 12:14:04 PM , Rating: 2
Racial epithet in addition to derogatory term for gender identity disorder (GID), much like tranny & etc.

RE: Dear Apple.
By Stublore on 10/13/2010 12:31:09 PM , Rating: 2
I can see how such a term might be derogatory, but could you please explain how it fits the definition of Racial epithet.
I was not aware trannies(?) were a race!

RE: Dear Apple.
By foolsgambit11 on 10/13/2010 5:12:03 PM , Rating: 2
This reminds me of the 'Tyson Homosexual' story from couple of years ago. World-Class sprinter Tyson Gay got auto-word-replaced on a Christian news site, so the article had lines like, "...Homosexual was a blur in blue..." and this gem, "'It means a lot to me,' the 25-year-old Homosexual said. 'I'm glad my body could do it, because now I know I have it in me.'"

RE: Dear Apple.
By tastyratz on 10/13/2010 3:01:44 PM , Rating: 2
Really? Are you REALLY going to swear that much in such a clever way as to avoid being rated down automatically by the dailytech engine? Thank you for making that post more family friendly. Surely your helpful poetic contribution will not be a -1 faster than you thought possible...

RE: Dear Apple.
By The Raven on 10/15/2010 11:24:52 AM , Rating: 2
Swear words? Where? All I see as objectionable is "big rubber dildo."

The rest is just gobbledygook.

I think you missed his point. The point where people will find a way to get around this nonsense. Whether it is this or cockney rhyming.

"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki