backtop


Print 63 comment(s) - last by atlmann10.. on Oct 13 at 2:48 PM


The Wall Street Journal says the iPhone is coming to Verizon early next year.  (Source: FoneArena)
New carrier is unlikely to turn back the Android tide, but should make Apple a tidy sum of cash

Since the launch of the iPhone one critical factor has remained constant.  In the smartphone's biggest market -- the United States -- the iPhone was sold exclusively on AT&T.  But that's about to change.

The Wall Street Journal claims that multiple sources brief by Apple have said that a CDMA iPhone will land early next year on Verizon's network.  CDMA is Verizon's 3G tech of choice.  Sprint also uses CDMA, while T-Mobile and AT&T utilize GSM, a rival standard.

The iPhone undeniably helped AT&T hang on to its second place spot in the U.S.  However, many customers -- particularly in 2007 and 2008 -- were disgruntled about AT&T's poor voice network.  While AT&T has made a concerted effort to improve, the experience has still left a bitter taste in many's mouth, and many still hold a negative opinion about the carrier's quality of service. 

Meanwhile the iPhone is struggling to stave off dozens of handsets sporting Google's Android operating system which have flooded the U.S. market.  Android has already passed the iPhone in U.S. sales and analysts generally believe that it is only a matter of time before it does the same worldwide.  More worrisome for Apple, interest in the iPhone is also dropping.

A shift to Verizon, the nation's largest carrier, could help Apple somewhat with both problems. According to James Ratcliffe at Barclays Capital, a Verizon iPhone would grow the carrier's subscriber base by 900,000 in 2011 and sell 9 million iPhones in total (most sales going to existing customers).  Hudson Square Research, on the other hand, believes that Verizon could gain even more new subscribers, estimating that 4 million iPhone users would switch from AT&T -- roughly 18 percent of AT&T's iPhone subscriber base.

Verizon Communications Inc. President Lowell McAdam refused to confirm or deny the rumors of an Apple deal, stating, "At some point our business interests are going to align.  I fully expect it, but I don't have anything to say."

The report offers a lot of compelling details to support its claims that the Verizon iPhone is real.  It claims that Pegatron Technology Corp., a contract manufacturer subsidiary of Taiwanese electronics giant Asustek Computer Inc. won the contract to produce the phone.  And reportedly Qualcomm is providing the CDMA chipset for the new phone, though the form factor will stay the same.

A Verizon iPhone was already prophesied earlier this year by 
Bloomberg, which says the phone will land in January (coinciding with one of Apple's typical product launch times).  However, one of the sources briefed by Apple told The Wall Street Journal offers a new piece of information -- Apple is also working on a different form factor of its popular device.

If it truly exists, the real question is whether this form factor is bigger or smaller than the existing iPhone.  A likely scenario seems a smaller candy-bar like phone, similar to the iPod Nano 5G.

The need for a Verizon iPhone is illustrated most clearly by subscriber numbers.  According to market researchers at Comscore, in August 2009 there were only 866,000 Android smartphones, compared to 7.8 million iPhones in the U.S.  In August 2010 Android had exploded to 10.9 million phones, while Apple managed an impressive, but lesser growth to 13.5 million handsets.

Ultimately despite the "danger" of getting passed by Android, the release of a Verizon iPhone may be more about bumping up profit and less about staving off its competitor.  After all, Apple currently has only 2.8 percent market share in the global phone market, but it makes 39 percent of its profits thanks to its ability to move less-than-premium hardware at premium prices and its aggressive negotiation of supply deals.  Android eventually passing Apple seems inevitable, even if Apple does launch a Verizon iPhone, but the new phone could send the already profitable company soaring to new heights in profitability.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: I hope this is true...
By adiposity on 10/8/2010 1:39:42 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Why not get an android based phone then? They have apps for music... they even have 1 built in. I'm not seeing the problem here or the reason why you NEED an iPhone for music purposes. That is stupid honestly.


This is a pretty ignorant comment. For most people who have iPhones/iPods, music is not even the #1 use. The #1 use is is apps/games. This is also the same for Android. To tell someone to get an Android phone over an iPhone just because they both have music is...retarded.

I vastly prefer my Droid over an iPhone. But it does have annoying flaws:

1. cannot edit previous entered search (Droid2 fixes this with blur)
2. Cannot undelete e-mails in imap mode (or move between folders at all)
3. cannot use touchscreen to "bubble-focus" on text, making it hard to edit on screen text (Droid2 fixes this with blur)
4. Phone screen activates when making a bluetooth call, even when in your pocket. This leads to pocket pressing of mute, speakerphone, and numbers.
5. Bluetooth voice-dial is terrible (and only exists in 2.2). It does not give you a chance to confirm who it is dialing, but rather, just DIALS! And since the recognition is so bad...that gets really annoying.
6. I have to turn wireless on/off frequently to get connected to WIFI. I also have to reset bluetooth on occasion to get it to connect.
7. There is no built-in way of setting wallpapers that doesn't drastically down-sample your images. I am forced to use "wallpaper set and save" (a working but annoyingly designed program) to use images I designed to be exactly my screen resolution.

Now, I love my Droid, and for obvious reasons, prefer it over an iPhone. But with the exception of #6, my GF's iPhone does not have any of these problems. It's kind of embarrassing.

The question of apps is still heavily in favor of iPhone as well, but at least we are catching up on that front. Google really needs to fix some of these Android annoyances. At least motorola/htc are addressing some of them.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki