Print 30 comment(s) - last by hsew.. on Oct 4 at 10:12 PM

Mohseni and Nudo's research on traumatic brain injuries was inspired by the number of soldiers who suffer from this every day  (Source: Military Times)
A microchip on a circuit board could bring axons together restoring physical and emotional abilities

Researchers are working to recover normal movement and behavior within patients who have suffered brain damage by creating microelectronic circuitry that will promote the reconnection of neurons and growth of axons.

This type of work was inspired by the brain injuries and trauma the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan face. Pedram Mohseni, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Case Western Reserve University, along with Randolph J. Nudo, professor of molecular and integrative physiology at Kansas University Medical Center, are the top researchers on this project who recognize that head trauma/injury is common in injured soldiers, despite their use of armor and helmets.

Brain damage comes with side effects that can drastically alter a person's normal reality, such as loss of mobility, balance, coordination and problem-solving skills. Emotional side effects include depression, anxiety, social inappropriateness, emotional outbursts, mood swings and aggression.

But now, further research of these injuries indicates that a healthy brain, as it develops, creates and maintains communication pathways that allow neurons to "repeatedly fire together." So Mohseni and Nudo's new research revolves around the repeated communications between neurons who are distant only weeks after injury, which could lead to the reconnection of distant axons as well. 

Researchers note that the month following an injury is a crucial time period in their research because the brain is redeveloping at this point. This allows them to perform extensive rewiring where the brain cannot do so itself.

"The month following injury is a window of opportunity," said Mohseni. "We believe we can do this with an injured brain, which is very malleable."

Both researchers are able to do this by bringing their separate projects and expertise together. Mohseni has been developing a multichannel microelectronic device called a brain-machine-brain interface, which is capable of bypassing gaps left after injury. This device works through a microchip, which is smaller than a quarter, on a circuit board where the microchip amplifies neural action potentials, which are signals created by one part of the brain. An algorithm is then used to separate signals, which indicate brain spike activity from noise. 

When brain spike activity is found, the microchip delivers a "current pulse" to activate neurons in another part of the brain, thus reconnecting both regions of the brain. 

Nudo contributed his expertise on brain activity, after studying and mapping brain activity in rats, then testing the new device and the neuroanatomical rewiring theory on a traumatic brain injury model. 

The brain-machine-brain interface is a miniature device that connects to microelectrodes implanted in two regions of the brain, and stays outside of the body. 

In the future, Mohseni and Nudo hope to test their ability to rewire the brain further on rat models. If this process turns out well, they would like to move on to testing this procedure on non-human primates. If the primates are able to recover from brain injuries after extensive rewiring, Mohseni and Nudo see human patients using this in approximately 10 years.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By RugMuch on 9/28/2010 11:51:26 AM , Rating: -1
can some one plz define a soul technically.

I am flat out saying this, imagine how many years were wasted on thinking the brain has a soul.

Look the brain is nothing more than a complicated computer.

RE: Soul
By FITCamaro on 9/28/2010 12:06:27 PM , Rating: 5
1) What does this have to do with the article at all?

2) Those who believe in a soul do not believe it is contained solely in the brain.

RE: Soul
By zippyzoo on 9/28/10, Rating: 0
RE: Soul
By GaryJohnson on 9/28/2010 3:12:33 PM , Rating: 2
Um, actually soft served sciences like psychology will admit to saying the brain contains the soul.

Um, actually, soft served sciences like psychology will admit that none of that which you just said makes any sense.

RE: Soul
By zippyzoo on 9/28/2010 3:38:08 PM , Rating: 1
Do you want to say converse about the Jung approach or are you just going to make the most general statement possible to get the words GARYJOHNSON somewhere someone will read it.

RE: Soul
By GaryJohnson on 9/28/2010 3:59:27 PM , Rating: 2
That makes even less sense than your other statement."The Jung approach" doesn't relate to the article, this comment thread, your post, or my post in any way. So I would have to say that, "No, I don't want to converse about the Jung approach."

RE: Soul
By Skywalker123 on 9/28/2010 5:32:07 PM , Rating: 3
Finally an article providing glimmer of hope for FITCAMARO, and you criticize him! Don't give up FIT! Miracles happen everyday.

RE: Soul
By Whedonic on 9/28/2010 12:26:23 PM , Rating: 2
"contained solely"
pun intended?

RE: Soul
By Ammohunt on 9/28/2010 1:52:34 PM , Rating: 2
Don't any of you watch Ghost Hunters or Ghost adventures? those shows wouldn't exist of the Soul/Spirit lived only in the brain.

RE: Soul
By tng on 9/28/2010 2:12:25 PM , Rating: 2
Really guys, does anybody think that this has to do with the "Soul"?

Now conciseness is something that might be connected here and despite what atheists and religious types think, there is ongoing research on where our conciseness comes from. As of now, it continues to be a mystery that can't all be explained by the "Brain As A Organic Computer" explanation.

RE: Soul
By eggman on 9/28/2010 3:33:38 PM , Rating: 2
Actually the brain is a very slow and inefficient analog computer.

RE: Soul
By RugMuch on 9/28/2010 3:52:38 PM , Rating: 3
I am going to argue with you, not because I actually disagree with you.

You say it is slow, because of visual FPS 30 distinct 60 partial images?

We know that brain actualization is easily calculated?

The brain is able to represent everything in binary and some sort cubit state?

Or, even the deprecation of resistive memory?

can you elaborate, again don't disagree just want reason.

RE: Soul
By abel2 on 9/28/2010 5:51:19 PM , Rating: 2
I believe he is saying it is slow, because compared to a computer, it is slow. The average action potential takes one millisecond, which is quite slow relative to a computer. Motor neurons are even slower.

RE: Soul
By YashBudini on 9/28/2010 6:21:42 PM , Rating: 1
Actually the brain is a very slow and inefficient analog computer.

Yeah but when it's running on a Venti with a triple shot of espresso and the appropriate heat sinks it overclocks like crazy.

RE: Soul
By dark matter on 9/29/2010 12:58:37 PM , Rating: 2
First of all the Brain isn't a computer, it's an organ.

And if you wish to compare it to a computer it is in fact a highly complex massively parallel multi-tasker that can put any computer to shame. Consider the math that goes into catching a ball and then get me a computer that can do that along with processing all the other information the brain receives about its environment.

And I haven't even begun to mention art or emotion....

RE: Soul
By eggman on 9/29/2010 1:34:03 PM , Rating: 2
I did not say it was not the most incredible accomplishment of evolution on earth just that it was slow in its signal propagation capability and inefficient in that it has a lot of evolutionary baggage in it. Nature is inherently lazy, and thus evolution is not exactly an optimization process.

RE: Soul
By pyrrhon on 9/29/2010 9:08:08 AM , Rating: 2
Not a single person posting here realize that all their views, ideas, opinions, are happening within what we call 'soul'. And yes this little article, like this computer idea, and my response to it is a 'phenomene' of conscience. It is, because your 'soul' is a-conscience-of-it. The subject folks is never seen but is what sees, the reason is not tough-of but is what thinks. Do not reduce being to an object there. Do not reduce human to a computer. Beware of scientific dictatorship! Beware of yourself.

"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)

Most Popular ArticlesSmartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki