The UK Opens the World's Largest Offshore Wind Farm
September 23, 2010 9:50 AM
comment(s) - last by
The new Thanet wind farm produces 300 MW of electricity, making it the world's largest offshore wind farm.
(Source: Vattenfall AB)
Nation now has 5 GW of installed wind capacity, enough to provide 4 percent of its power needs
In the United Kingdom today, excitement was afoot as the world's largest wind power installation
. The 300 MW farm was constructed by Swedish alternative energy firm
. It is located on the North Sea, on the east face of the island, approximately 2 hours east of the capital city of London.
England's Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Chris Huhne comments, "The U.K. is going to be the fastest-growing market for renewable energy anywhere for the next couple of years. We will urge the wind industry to install 10 times more capacity by 2020. To this end, we are currently talking to General Electric and companies such as Siemens and Mitsubishi will play a part."
aims to get 15 percent of its power
from alternative energy by 2020. With the latest addition the country now gets 4 percent of its power from wind. Wind is arguably England's greatest alternative energy resource; as it is at a northern latitude it doesn't get quite as much direct sunlight, but its sea-bordered location makes for steady winds.
The new farm, located near the city of Thanet, the farm increases Britain's offshore wind total to 1,341 MW. With its 3,715 megawatts of onshore wind, the nation now has over 5 GW of total wind power capacity -- enough to power an estimated 2.7 million homes.
The project is estimated to cost £800M (roughly $1.253B USD)
Top News UK
, or £900M (roughly $1.409B USD)
The installation covers 35 km
and consists of 100 Vestas Wind Systems A/S
wind turbines. The V90 is an example of the growing class of "
" designed for offshore use. It generates 3 MW of power at peak and its blades span 90 meters.
Deploying offshore wind power is logistically tougher, as it requires you to install turbines at sea that can withstand ocean storms, and additionally to install undersea transmission cables. However, it has the potential to generate more electricity than onshore installations, due to the stronger wind currents -- which in turn may lead to lower cost per kWh than tradition onshore turbines.
As opposed to the onshore wind power industry, which is dominated by established players, the offshore wind power industry is just now taking off. The UK is working to position itself at the center of that new industry.
And early indications are that those efforts are yielding success; a number of companies -- General Electric Co., Siemens AG and Clipper Windpower Plc -- recently announced plans to build offshore wind turbine factories in the UK. RenewableUK Chief Executive Officer Maria McCaffery comments, "The onshore wind supply chain is already well established in Germany, Denmark and Spain. Nobody has an onshore wind supply chain, and we want that to be here. U.K. manufacturing protects us totally from exchange-rate fluctuations."
The UK is aiming for 13 to 14 GW of installed onshore wind power capacity by 2020, as well. It recently approved 32.200 GW in projects, giving licenses to Centrica Plc, RWE AG and Statoil ASA.
The U.S. is currently preparing
similar offshore wind projects
, but has seen construction and development delayed from lawsuits from a variety of groups including citizens who claim offshore turbines mar their view and damage property values;
; and environmental activists, who
claim the turbines disrupt offshore wildlife
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: And one modern nuclear reactor can...
9/23/2010 4:19:03 PM
Very good points, I did my math on the peak power output which occurs less than 10% of the time, and 30% is indeed the average. Thank you for correcting my math, and I completely agree with your logic. Wind power should only be a secondary source of power, while I believe the backbone should be nuclear.
RE: And one modern nuclear reactor can...
9/23/2010 10:28:58 PM
Still right idea and it is understandable. The environmentalists hide the efficiency numbers and lifetime operating costs, because it destroys the credibility of wind. It is hard to find those statistics.
To be fair, nuclear's nameplate capacity is also slightly less - it is approximately 90%+ efficient. Vogtle plant claims around 91%.
"Death Is Very Likely The Single Best Invention Of Life" -- Steve Jobs
Norwegian Company Designs Giant 10MW Wind Turbine
August 9, 2010, 6:48 AM
Construction of Nation's Largest Wind Farm Starts With $1.2B Investment
August 3, 2010, 12:15 PM
UK Government Misses Renewable Energy Target by 75 Percent
June 12, 2010, 7:28 PM
U.S. Government Approves First Off-shore Wind Farm, Environmentalists Promise to Sue
April 29, 2010, 10:11 AM
Native Americans Fighting to Stop MA Wind Farm, Locals Fight Farm in MI
February 9, 2010, 10:20 AM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information