backtop


Print 44 comment(s) - last by jive.. on Sep 23 at 7:21 AM


Nokia's Anssi Vanjoki
Exiting Nokia exec guns for Android

There has been a lot of turmoil at Nokia in the past few weeks. Nokia CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo was ousted and replaced by a former Microsoft exec, Stephen Elop. Just days later, Executive Vice President Anssi Vanjoki announced that he would leave the company within six months.

With all the hubbub surrounding these departures and Nokia's efforts to launch new products, an article on Vanjoki in the Financial Times went unnoticed last week. Engadget managed to pick up on the piece in which Vanjoki is highly critical of Google's Android operating system.

Vanjoki states that smartphone manufacturers are flocking to Android, seeing it as a panacea to help boost profits. However, he states that using Android is only a short-term solution, and it won't be viable in the long-term as more manufacturers hop on the bandwagon and it becomes harder to differentiate between handsets.

Vanjoki bluntly states that manufacturers who use Android are like Finnish boys who "pee in their pants" to stay warm in the cold of winter.

Harsh words indeed, but this isn't the first time that we've heard such criticism of Android. Microsoft has long voiced its opposition to Android and most recently made it clear that the mobile operating system should not be considered "free" because of associated legal risks.

“It does infringe on a bunch of patents, and there’s a cost associated with that,” said Microsoft CFO Tivanka Ellawala. “So there’s a... cost associated with Android that doesn’t make it free.”

For the time being, both Nokia and Microsoft should be worried about Android growing even stronger in the U.S. market. Android has already surpassed Apple is making a run at RIM.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Already an issue for Android.
By superPC on 9/21/2010 10:59:27 AM , Rating: 5
that's right. windows drive more than 80% of PC and yet PC maker have no problem differentiating themself. why can't cell phone maker do the same?


RE: Already an issue for Android.
By quiksilvr on 9/21/2010 12:05:45 PM , Rating: 2
Of course PCs have trouble differentiating themselves and when they try, they bloat the OS with useless software and their own special "skin".

What Android makers need to do is leave stock Android as stock Android and have an APP over the OS to make it look cool and give the user the option to change things up.

There is also room for business in this as well. Suppose someone with a Droid 2 doesn't want MotoBlur or whatever it's called but is willing to spend $5-$10 for HTC's Sense UI. Well, voila! They can uninstall MotoBlur and do so. That is exactly what the market needs right now.

And furthermore, Google, OPEN UP THE MARKET TO NON-SMARTPHONE DEVICES!


By theArchMichael on 9/21/2010 5:10:26 PM , Rating: 2
I agree with you. Some people like that crap, let them buy it on the app store. Supposedly gingerbread, Android 3.0, will not allow manufacturer skinning customizations.

I think the idea of these customizations is give the user an experience that they will get used to... so that when they purchase another "Android Phone" they won't choose another manufacturer. Suits all think the same way... How about they just try to provide the best hardware running Android at the lowest price? That might just be crazy enough to work!


RE: Already an issue for Android.
By cditty on 9/21/2010 8:14:08 PM , Rating: 2
I agree with you on that. Selling you're skin in the market would be a great idea. I really prefer stock Android, but I do like Sense.


By retrospooty on 9/22/2010 8:15:09 AM , Rating: 2
"Of course PCs have trouble differentiating themselves and when they try, they bloat the OS with useless software "

THat useless software isnt to distinguish themselves, its to make money. The makers of the useless software generally pay them to be put on each machine to generate business, sales and even relevance. It keeps the prices down. Still useless and irritating, but the reason is not to distinguish.


By robinthakur on 9/22/2010 9:08:23 AM , Rating: 2
I can see why this might become a problem for the handset manufacturers (especially as Gingerbread won't allow hardwired skins) trying to differentiate their phones. In your model, people would read reviews of all the different skins, establish quickly which one was best and then only buy that one. Would people really be prepared to pay for them? I don't think so. There's also the loss of face for a company like Motorola to see its name on a product running a competitor's OS skin (i.e. not exactly advertising the brand) which flies in the face of all its previous instincts because it makes their customers more promiscuous to other brands if its just about the hardware.

However, even right now there are only one or two 'best' Android phones, with the rest being largely forgotten to people that know what they're talking about e.g. HTC Desire, Droid2, Galaxy Pro. The danger for manufacturers like LG, is that their new device won't factor within the top echelons and will therefore get quickly forgotten unless its heavily subsidised by carrier deals etc. You then get phones being released more frequently to constantly improve on the specs of the competitors' efforts, but somebody still needs to purchase all these handsets for the companies to turn a profit on all the R&D, otherwise the piece of the pie which the manufacturers can take home gets unaccceptably small. This works well for a smaller company like HTC who can turn around a product very quickly to market, but for the rest, its going to be a problem, in my view.

From the power users which Android attracts, you also have the pressure that they generally don't want *any* differentiators, operator logos or much customisation of the core Android OS which they can't easily remove, in which case, Google's model of only selling phones like the Nexus 1 through them would be a better fit than the current free-for-all.


"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki