backtop


Print 7 comment(s) - last by bbomb.. on Sep 17 at 11:55 PM


Slides accompanying AT&T Operations CEO John Stankey's speech.  (Source: Fiercemobilecontent.com)
HSPA+ by year's end, LTE to cover up to 75 million users by 2011

It appears that 4G wireless technology is slowly becoming a widespread reality in the U.S., with yesterday's announcement of Verizon LTE coming to 30 cities by year's end, and now, Fierce Wireless is reporting that AT&T plans to launch its own LTE network by mid-2011.

AT&T Operations CEO John Stankey announced the plans at a media and communications summit. Stankey said that AT&T is conducting trials of the 4G technology in Baltimore and Dallas, and that the company's primary LTE partners are Sony Ericsson and Acatel-Lucent.

AT&T has seemingly accelerated its LTE timetable. Earlier reports pinned technical trials to mid-2011, putting AT&T behind Verizon by nearly two years in terms of 4G rollout. Now, that number is more like six months. However, AT&T's LTE will cover, at most, 75 million users by the end of 2011, while Verizon will have 100 million covered in the next few months. Stankey said that the company's LTE deployment was different from the competitors', and that it "needs to carry forward its UMTS services to ensure that voice and data services can work simultaneously on both UMTS and LTE," Fierce Wireless reported.

In the beginning of the year, AT&T announced plans to spend a considerable chunk of change on upgrades to its current 3G network. Investor Place puts that number at around $8 billion for this year alone. Stankey mentioned some of these upgrades in his speech, adding that the nation's second-largest wireless carrier plans to launch HSPA+ by year's end. AT&T executives have said this will allow "real world download speeds of 7 Mbps." Meanwhile, the cell sites that have been upgraded to HSPA 7.2 will continue to upgrade backhaul.

HSPA+ has been a touchy topic for AT&T, ever since T-Mobile began rolling the upgraded technology out touting "4G-like" speeds. AT&T Mobility spokesperson Seth Bloom previously told us, "I think that companies need to be careful that they're not misleading customers by labeling HSPA+ as a 4G technology. We aren't labeling those technologies as 4G."

In his speech, Stankey admitted that he's "never satisfied" with his own company's network, upgrades to which he said have been impeded by shortages of parts from its vendors, totaling $300 million in backlogged network equipment.

At the Mobile Future Forward conference last week in Seattle, Fred Devereaux, president of AT&T's west region, also admitted to the carrier's network issues, TechFlash reports.

"We have a lot of work to do. I call it a success-based problem," Devereux said. "When you have 5,000 percent increases in anything -- whether that is traffic, customers, data usage -- you have a problem that the best engineers in the world will have trouble trying to figure out.

"Of the four major carriers in the U.S., we carry half of the mobile data traffic. So, we put a lot of cars on our freeway and we are trying to build bigger, faster freeways really fast."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Here's hoping....
By MGSsancho on 9/17/2010 5:52:06 PM , Rating: 2
Speaking as someone who worked at an ISP that used DOCIS 2.0 gear, you can not simply replace your gear and magically everything works. im not just talking about replacing connectors either. most problems were due to horrible wiring in buildings that would cost millions to replace. sometimes there is a single 500 cable that feeds a neighborhood and the run is already long. That is partly why some people can only get 3mbps regardless of the fact that everyone has 2 million dollar homes Some places that have underground wiring can not replace their lines. The pipes are already full of phone and cable lines and there isn't room for more. You would have to pull out all the cables, then bundle 500 cable, 150 pair (phone) and a few bundles of fiber. this would help both phone companies and cable companies. but this would knock out service to entire neighborhoods and require corporation of all local telcos to get this done in a week if their lucky. Some places only have CAT1 cable or general cable. So VDSL2 does work, just lots of interference and limited performance.

These are only some of the technical reasons to poor performance. The others are political.


"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki