backtop


Print 99 comment(s) - last by Pirks.. on Sep 20 at 9:41 AM


This chart demonstrates just how slow some of Apple's users are.  (Source: Loyalytics)

The study looked at upgrade rates for the iPhone 3GS (left) and the Android-powered Motorola Droid (right).  (Source: DailyMobile)
Android is handily beating iOS in terms of upgrade rates, making life easier for its developers

Market researchers at Localytics looked at the Apple iPhone 3GS and Motorola Droid and upgrade rates to the latest respective OS versions -- iOS 4.0 and Android 2.2 "Froyo"  -- over their first two weeks of availability.  What they found was that nearly twice as many Android users upgraded to the latest OS as iPhone users.

The study showed the dramatic benefits of Android's over-the-air OS updates -- something Apple has either been unable or unwilling to implement.  IOS 4.0 saw a steady crawl upwards in adoption rates, that allowed it to temporarily get ahead of Android 2.2.  

But when the Android OTA packages landed, in a single day the Android 2.2 adoption jumped incredibly from around 42 percent to around 92 percent.  By the end of two weeks, Android's upgrade totals had reached 96 percent, while Apple had a mere 56 percent.

One thing Loyalytics says the study shows is that iPhone users are using iTunes less.  If they had plugged into iTunes they would have been prompted to update, but many users still appeared not to have connected after almost two weeks.  This may be a result of Apple enabling over-the-air content downloads from its iTunes store, which is directly accessible from the iPhone.

However, the study brings mixed news to developers on both fronts.  For Android developers the rapid updates are good in a way, because they can be assured a homogeneous platform.  It can also be bad, because if an update breaks your app, you may only have have a couple of days to fix the problem before the majority of users can't use it.

For iPhone developers the opposite is true.  The platform is more heterogeneous in terms of OS versions, which can be confusing as to which versions to target and when.  On the other hand, iPhone devs have more time to fix bugs created by OS updates.

The researchers conclude:

The extent to which the iPad is or isn’t cannibalizing PC sales is being debated. But it seems reasonable to assume that even fewer iPads will be plugged into computers than iPhones, suggesting that iPad upgrades to iOS 4.2 later this year will lag iPhone upgrades. At some point, Apple will probably need/want to provide OTA upgrades to both the iPad and iPhone, at least over WiFi.

Of course as anyone who knows Apple could tell you, the company is sure to take adopting this new feature at its own pace, however fast or slow that may be.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: dunno about you guys
By Iaiken on 9/15/2010 2:19:24 PM , Rating: 2
You fail at stats.

quote:
shows that only %28.7 of Android handset have been upgraded to 2.2.


That is because there are numerous devices whose manufacturers have no intention of upgrading them to 2.2.

For devices that do OTA 2.2 updates, 95%+ adoption rates are pretty commonplace. Meanwhile the adoption rate for devices like the LG GW620 will remain 0% due to LG flat out stating that they have no intention to upgrade the phone past v1.6.

This goes back to my other comment about Google allowing devs to set up separate streams for their apps for different versions of Android.

This is another reason to stick to manufacturers with a very active support life-cycle (Motorola, HTC, Samsung), lest you be stuck with 1.6 until you change handsets.


RE: dunno about you guys
By Keeir on 9/15/2010 4:14:09 PM , Rating: 1
No... you fail at stats.

The point isn't how many people of a particular phone upgrade thier operating system... its how many people using a particular operating system update thier operating system. It really doesn't matter WHY they don't update, just that they don't...

The important information of a developer is the # of people using a particular OS and number of OS that should be supported. If developing an App for Andriod means a large number of version of Andriod to support... does it really matter if its because some Manu. are lazy? Its still extra effort... unless your willing throw out a large number of people who are stuck at 1.6, 2.0, etc


RE: dunno about you guys
By Iaiken on 9/15/2010 5:27:12 PM , Rating: 3
I write apps for Android and if you're not a total retard, maintaining a source control with hybrid branching is NOT hard.

I maintain a main branch, most of which goes into each of my hybrid sub-branches for each major version of Android. These sub-branches almost exclusively contain version specific (sometimes phone specific) bug fixes that my customers request.

Predictably, I haven't had to do anything specifically for 1.5 or 1.6 for about a year now and 2.0 has remained unchanged for ~5 months. Why? Because as I add version specific features for new android versions, I don't seed them backwards into streams where I know they won't work.

So to me, your perception of what these stats mean to Android developers is irrelevant because the scenario that you are cooking up hasn't happened anywhere but in your flippant little mind.

Go make up more 'facts'.


RE: dunno about you guys
By Alexstarfire on 9/15/2010 11:09:41 PM , Rating: 2
It does matter why, just not to developers.


"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki