backtop


Print 109 comment(s) - last by kingius.. on Oct 8 at 9:12 AM


Microsoft employees carry a coffin for Apple's iPhone  (Source: Carl J)

  (Source: Carl J)
Microsoft is pretty confident about how Windows Phone 7 will perform in the marketplace

Well, we can say that the folks from Redmond definitely have a morbid sense of humor. In celebration of the release to manufacturing (RTM) of Windows Phone 7, Microsoft held a mock funeral for two of the stars of the smartphone community: the Apple iPhone and RIM's BlackBerry.

According to Neowin, there were hearses for both the iPhone and the BlackBerry along with Microsoft employees dressed up in Windows Phone 7 garb. Microsoft even went so far as to have employees performing the infamous "Thriller Dance" to celebrate the hope that Windows Phone 7 will bury the competition.

Interestingly enough, while Microsoft definitely had Apple and RIM in its crosshairs today, “dead” Google was nowhere to be found. There were no hearses for the Android OS, so either Microsoft just overlooked this "minor" detail, or it doesn't think that it has the muscle to bury Android so quickly.

Windows Phone 7 is reportedly set to launch on October 11.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: It would be appropriate
By dark matter on 9/12/2010 11:49:22 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Another clueless one here boys.... Vista and Win7 are practically identical under the hood and mostly in interface as well.


Well the taskbar is nothing like Vista. Nor is the snap interface. The libraries in explorer are different. And then you have the fact that the GDI in Vista isn't hardware accelerated and every window needs to be buffered. Due to this Vista needs an AWFUL lot of RAM if you open a lot of windows as it has to buffer them all.

Windows 7 reverts this and all GDI interfaces are hardware accelerated. I cannot understand why ANYONE would prefer an un-accelerated 2D desktop environment over one that utilises the GPU.

quote:

After the Vista service pack there's very little difference, you turn down UAC and everything is just fine.


Millions would disagree with you, but given the advice above and the ridiculous pissing contest you come out with below I would be wasting my time offering any more justifications.

quote:

I'm a 15 yr developer who builds $3k systems every year or two and guess what, I PREFER Vista 64 over Win7.


WTF is this about? Did you mean to say you're a 15 year old "developer" who gets 3k off daddikins every year to build his latest and greatest and then has a $800 GPU sitting there not being used because Vista is unable to utilise the hardware properly to render your desktop.

quote:

I won't get into why


But yet you still do....

quote:

but it's usability. And don't forget in benchmarks both OS are almost idential in performance and in MANY tests Vista is the fastest.


Is this what you do with your time? Read tests on your 3k rig? What not learn a skill, like Maya, you know put that 3k rig to good use. Oh wait a minute, you can't put your GPU to good use. Still, you must have plenty of ram and plenty of CPU power to help you render those web pages.

quote:

Know the facts, don't just buy into media hype and jump on the banwagon, especially when spouting off on an enthusiast site.


Ha ha ha. You know what, you really had me fooled right up until this last point. You're taking the piss right. Well, it was really convincing I must say.

If you're not, well, words really do escape me. God help your employer is all I can say.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Belard on 9/12/2010 9:45:41 PM , Rating: 1
I've meet my share of "experienced" who don't know squat. Its rather odd that anyone would prefer vista over 7 and then claim to be experts.

When Vista was very new and limited XP, a friend's mother; about 80yrs old - needed a new PC right there and then. I didn't have time to build. So we picked up a Compaq with Vista. Yeah, not top-end with a P4-Class CPU, 1GB of RAM... but it was cheap and ALL she needs to do is (A) check her email and (B) play Solitaire since her hands are very bad. Her old Celeron 300mhz HP had died that day and a 2+Ghz CPU should be more than enough to handle the job.

I cleaned out the crap and useless junk and got that machine as fast as it'll ever get. For almost 2 months, at least once a week - she'd call me about THIS not working, lock-ups, not shutting down, not booting up, running slow... RUNNING SLOW for an 80 year old WOMAN?! Solitaire CRASHED constantly and while it looks great, MS's made the game require more hand-strokes/button presses to work so the game HURT her hands! I've donated another GB of RAM, a bit better.

Screw this!

She spent $100 for XP-HOME, I got on the phone with HP to find the hidden XP drivers over various FTP & HTTP locations.
I wanted the drivers ready to go, and I started unpacking the 40mb audio driver. Get this...

Vista spends about 2 minutes, calculating HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE TO UNPACK THE FRACKIN FILE! TWO MINUTES!! Then it starts unpacking and reports it'll take something like 8~10 minutes! WTF! I stop that, pulled the plug (screw shutting down vista and what little data she had was on my USB key), I completely wiped out the HD, installed XP.... get this, that SAME 40mb ZIP file unpacked in about 35 seconds! On my own desktop, that same file would take about 15~20 seconds (we're talking 3-4 years ago).

Yeah.. Vista rocks! 2mins+10min to unpack a ZIP file vs. 20seconds under XP... thats really advanced! Bull.

And of course she was complaining about the UAC... UAC bugs you about adjusting your video settings!! WTF?! etc etc, over and over again - non-stop. Yeah, I killed that too.. vista still ran like crap.

Anyways... since the day I replaced that vista crap with XP, I've never heard a peep about any computer issues. I talked to her today... she never talks about her computer or at least any issues.

Yeah, the people who lived through vista and have 8~12GB of RAM have nothing to complain about I guess. I was afraid Win7 was going to be just as crappy (memory wise) as vista, so I built even bottom-end PCs with 4GB and Windows7 MCE/PRO... memory was cheap back then too, $50~60 for 4GB (thanks to vista).

Since Windows7 came out, I've yet to upgrade my Quad core system from its original 2GB. I have other things to spend $50 on. A date and movie, gas, etc. Only 1 game, Supreme Commander - kills my memory with medium to large maps. oh well.

I've installed Win7-RC on very old computers... like 1.6Ghz AMD-32 with 512mb of RAM...and they ran better than vista systems with 3GB.

I've been encoding while typing this. 1GB free.


"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

Related Articles
Windows Phone 7 Hits RTM
September 1, 2010, 10:53 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki