backtop


Print 109 comment(s) - last by kingius.. on Oct 8 at 9:12 AM


Microsoft employees carry a coffin for Apple's iPhone  (Source: Carl J)

  (Source: Carl J)
Microsoft is pretty confident about how Windows Phone 7 will perform in the marketplace

Well, we can say that the folks from Redmond definitely have a morbid sense of humor. In celebration of the release to manufacturing (RTM) of Windows Phone 7, Microsoft held a mock funeral for two of the stars of the smartphone community: the Apple iPhone and RIM's BlackBerry.

According to Neowin, there were hearses for both the iPhone and the BlackBerry along with Microsoft employees dressed up in Windows Phone 7 garb. Microsoft even went so far as to have employees performing the infamous "Thriller Dance" to celebrate the hope that Windows Phone 7 will bury the competition.

Interestingly enough, while Microsoft definitely had Apple and RIM in its crosshairs today, “dead” Google was nowhere to be found. There were no hearses for the Android OS, so either Microsoft just overlooked this "minor" detail, or it doesn't think that it has the muscle to bury Android so quickly.

Windows Phone 7 is reportedly set to launch on October 11.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: It would be appropriate
By Belard on 9/12/2010 2:04:14 AM , Rating: 0
Out of box experince on a Vista PC, even with latest SPs... sucked.

With vista, there wasn't any incentive to upgrade from XP. And in many ways, Windows7 isn't either. DX11? Okay... how many games really make use of DX10?

Early days? Even after SP2, Vista blew chunks. It sucked memory, it was sluggish, er IT IS SLUGGISH. Even 2 years after its release.

Sure, a typical Win-box may run fine out of the shop. Start adding some user software and real-world use, and vista's short-comings are all over the place.

Whatever... vista is a DEAD OS, period. FAIL, no doubt.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Reclaimer77 on 9/12/2010 2:22:27 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
And in many ways, Windows7 isn't either.


I was a XP holdover who skipped Vista, but even I can't agree with this statement. On the same hardware, Windows7 is a total and significant upgrade from XP. No doubt about it. And I'm not talking about DX11, it's a lot more obvious than that in day to day use.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Belard on 9/12/2010 1:20:11 PM , Rating: 2
I'm talking about ability and business. For small business, schools and many people - there isn't any real advantage for Win7. Keep in mind that many were using DOS well into Windows98, some even into Win7 (ugh).

Yes, when using WinXP at a clients place is sometimes odd when I'm trying to do a Win7 GUI functions like throwing windows to the side, etc. But that doesn't keep me from getting work done. V/W7 are still based off of XP along with many of built-in defects NT in general, compatibility is important after-all.

But, other than DX10~11, what can Win7 do that XP cant? Networking, browsing, MS-Office, etc etc.. There isn't a single Win7 game out there... other than HALO2 and that was (A) artificial (B) a crappy game (C) there are hacks for that. Maybe 1-2 other MS games are also "DX10" only for sake of forcing people into vista (fail). It is completely in MS's ability to make HALO3 and REACH for PC - but MS wants people on Xbox with its LOW-res. So to a degree, DX10~12 are moot if high-end PC gaming dies (other than MMORPG and RTS games).

When you grow up on computers from the beginning such as Commodore 64 (8bit, 1Mhz - NO HD) and AppleIIs (same stats, but ugh) then to original 9" B&W MAC which were like "WOW!!" and Amigas at 8mhz. When going from 2 to 16 colors is a BIG jump, much less 256 and then thousands.

Windows 7 is a very good upgrade and change over the 10 year old WindowsXP.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Reclaimer77 on 9/12/2010 7:22:29 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
For small business, schools and many people - there isn't any real advantage for Win7.


The added security over XP alone is "worth it." I don't think there's any debate that 7 is by far more secure down to the kernel level than XP ever was. The problem is, it costs LOTS of money to change OS's due to MS's licensing structure. So if schools or businesses seem reluctant to go to 7, that isn't a mark against the OS itself.

Having said that, I do believe I read that 7 is enjoying impressive business adoption rates compared to Vista.

quote:
But, other than DX10~11, what can Win7 do that XP cant? Networking, browsing, MS-Office, etc etc..


Well by this logic we could all still be using Windows 2000. It does all that stuff too! As far as the gaming stuff, high end PC gaming isn't going anywhere this decade in my opinion.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Wonga on 9/12/2010 9:13:59 AM , Rating: 3
"Out of box experince on a Vista PC, even with latest SPs... sucked."

Negative.


RE: It would be appropriate
By Belard on 9/12/2010 11:46:22 AM , Rating: 2
You are entitled to your opinion.

I pretty much know my way around Vista, since I have Windows7 on two of my own computers. I've set up a Toshiba notebook with Vista as good as it'll ever get (cleaned out crap, installed good tools - that I use on my own computers) - its technically FASTER & BETTER than my ThinkPad, even when I had 1GB RAM installed... it was still slower and still sucked right next to my ThinkPad... with XP and with Win7.

One of my friends, who does quite a bit beta-testing, tried to get me to use Vista... Sometime after SP1 was installed, even he got tired of Vista and went back to XP. He's been using Win7 only since RCs. I put an RC on my ThinkPad and loved it. Put XP back on for about a month or so... ;)


"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher

Related Articles
Windows Phone 7 Hits RTM
September 1, 2010, 10:53 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki