backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by Renski.. on Sep 13 at 6:00 PM

Dev Team has found an exploit for iOS 4.1

When the iPhone 4 and iOS 4.0 was released, the Dev Team was able to relatively easily develop a browser-based jailbreak using JailbreakMe.com. The jailbreak made use of an vulnerability in the way that Mobile Safari handled PDF documents.

Now, just hours after the official iOS 4.1 ipsw was posted to Apple's servers, the Dev Team has discovered a bootrom exploit that will used in the iOS 4.1 jailbreak. The Dev Team's Musclenerd tweeted, "Crazy timing that @pod2g got latest exploit just as 4.1 went public (lots of work left…keep away from 4.1 for now!)."

According to Redmond Pie, this exploit won't be something that Apple will be able to patch as quickly as the previous PDF exploit:

Also, the best thing about a low-level bootrom exploit is that Apple wont be able to patch it simply by releasing a new firmware update. Instead, it will require Apple to release a revised hardware version of iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad and the iPod touches with new bootroms in order to patch the bootrom exploit.

This is good news for iPhone 4 users that want the fixes included in the iOS 4.1 update (proximity sensor, Bluetooth connection issues), while at the same time providing access to the wealth of "underground apps" and customizations that can be had with unauthorized app stores like Cydia.

You'll just have to be patient as the Dev Team works its magic to complete work on the iOS 4.1 jailbreak.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By lolmuly on 9/8/2010 9:41:11 PM , Rating: 3
I think the issue i have with the piracy argument is this:

If you were to buy a hammer, does the manufacturer have the right to tell you what brand of nails you can use it with?

If you were to buy a computer, does the manufacturer have the right to tell you that you can only run windows on it?

If you buy any piece of hardware, you should have the freedom to run the software of your choosing, if you choose to break the law that is your choice, but there needs to be a separation of hardware and software. Hardware manufacturers shouldn't have the right to tell you what software to use, and software manufacturers shouldn't have the right to tell you what hardware to use.


By whoisnader on 9/9/2010 12:15:32 AM , Rating: 2
That is a valid argument and I support it.

I just wonder if the majority are Jail Breaking in support of your argument, or like the clown I described, Jail Breaking to pirate software. I am tipping the majority are pirating and using your valid argument as justification.

P.S. I didn't think my post was that upsetting to rate me down.


By randomly on 9/9/2010 11:16:06 AM , Rating: 2
I have no idea how many people are jailbreaking in order to pirate software. Personally I do it to have access to features and apps that apple doesn't allow. With only a very few exceptions I feel that apps are fairly priced and I have no problem paying for them and supporting the developer community. If my perceived value for the app is less than the price, I just don't buy it or use it.

Not paying for apps is like deporting your best and brightest students out of the country so you can save on food and housing costs. Financially advantageous in the short term, devastating to the economy in the long term.

It's sad that so many can't think past themselves and see the broader and long term implications of their actions.


By omnicronx on 9/9/2010 1:06:17 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not going to lie, I've jailbroken my iPad and I have pirated software.. That being said, I use it to trial said software, and if I like it, I buy it. If I don't like it, I remove it from my iPad (what would i keep something I don't need/want).

Someone before gave an example a guy willing to pay for a coffee, but not a $1 piece of software. Thats not really a fair comparison in all situations. I know what I'm going to get with my $4 coffee, sugary goodness that will keep me awake for a few hours.

I don't know what I'm going to get with most software on the Appstore, and I've been burned far too many times, its either I trial it first, or I don't buy it at all.

If that makes me a bad person.. well then.. I guess I'm a bad person ;)


By nybrian5 on 9/9/2010 11:20:48 PM , Rating: 2
I've bought too many $1 apps that suck or crash. Every app should have a 10 day trial period and after that, pay for the license.(Just like it's done with the Rock App store) It's kind of a no-brainer. Plus, jailbreaking expands the power and control of the iPhone. Adding content to the lock screen, live info on the weather icon, settings short-cuts and auto-closing folders when an app is opened. My list of jailbroken features screams of common sense.


By lolmuly on 9/10/2010 6:05:39 AM , Rating: 2
Pirates are Pirates

Rights are Rights

just because a right makes it easier for a pirate, doesn't mean we take the right away.

just because a pirate argues in favor of a right, doesn't make the right any less just.

when somebody breaks a law they ALWAYS, try and justify it. No matter the law, no matter the justification, it doesn't change the argument.

Pirates are Pirates

Rights are Rights


By SunAngel on 9/9/2010 12:27:01 AM , Rating: 1
Okay. How about this.

You need an account to post on DailyTech. Do they have a right to make you open an account to post free speech?

DailyTech does not let you edit your commments. Do they have a right to keep you from changing your word?

DailyTech has a rating system that singles-out your comment if others don't like it. Do they have a right to highlight unpopular comments only not other comments?

DailyTech attempts censorship, but do they turn away accounts if it's known the user has accounts at other websites?

Some people that post on DailyTech play by DailyTech's rules, yet find it difficult to accept the rules that others ask them to play by.

You created your account on DailyTech. You have the the right to adjust your account the way you like it. As with jailbreaking, I don't think there is a law against hacking a website and editing your own personal information. The account is for your benefit not the benefit of DailyTech.

Yet, your quick to point out ownership of something but accept the rules of some but ignore others. Hypocracy and hate, in your terms, are nearly indistinguishable. Hating Apple for something is wishes to maintain tight control over is nothing different than you accepting DailyTech's term of service and abiding by them.

Yes you can pick and chose whom you dislike, but you must also live with your choices. When you exclude yourself from the masses and decide free-reign is more enjoyable that is your right. Don't blame the world because you chose a different path and that path is hard.


By whoisnader on 9/9/2010 12:35:16 AM , Rating: 2
Do you take issue with what I posted or Dailytech and their commenting system?


By Da W on 9/9/2010 6:49:17 AM , Rating: 3
You are flushing the apple model down the toilet. The only problem is that Apple is both an hardware and software company. They ultimately have the right to sell you both products in a single (overpriced) package, just like printers are sold with their specific ink cartridge and cable companies sell you their set-top box. I'm not saying it's ok.

However, anti-trust laws makes it illegal to bundle if there is a competiting product (would could port android on an iphone) and if Apple had a monopoly on the market, or close to it. The only reason microsoft got finned in Europe was because they had 90%+ of the market.

Where i have a problem, it's when a software company tries to prevent you to resell a used videogame. Now that's a load of $/%&?*()*&?$%.


By lolmuly on 9/10/2010 5:59:50 AM , Rating: 2
see that's where I have an issue, they shouldn't be considered a monopoly for producing both software and hardware, (i mean a video card manufacturer shouldn't be sued for producing their own drivers right?) but in the same light they shouldn't have the right to dictate what software you use on their hardware, and what hardware you use on their software.

unfortunately it seems they do currently have that right, but we need to draw a definitive legal line between software and hardware.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki