Print 28 comment(s) - last by leexgx.. on Sep 2 at 10:37 PM

Sprint has two phones capable of using its 4G WiMAX network -- the EVO 4G and the just-launched Epic 4G. T-Mobile has no current phones compatible with its 3.5G HSPA+ network, but will soon get its first, the G2 Android smart phone.  (Source: Sprint)
Next gen coverage is reaching more users

Fourth generation wireless technology (4G) offers faster data transmission speeds which is critical to smartphones or computers using tethering to access the internet.

This week Sprint, the third largest carrier in the U.S., announced that three more cities are covered by its 4G network.  The additions to the official coverage list are Boston, MA; Daytona Beach, FL; and Providence, RI.  With the additions, Sprint now covers over 40 million people in approximately 40 large U.S. cities.

Sprint is betting on the 4G tech WiMAX.  Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile have all pledged to support a rival technology -- LTE -- though only Verizon has begun to implement an LTE test network.  Sprint says it won't rule out developing an LTE network at some point, but for now thinks WiMAX is the superior tech. 

Sprint has finally got its act together and released a pair of 4G-capable phones.  Its HTC EVO 4Gwas the first 4G phone to hit.  Now the Epic 4G is offered as well, giving buyers yet another option.  And Sprint also offers a 4G ready USB modem and wireless hotspot, via a partnership with Sierra wireless.

T-Mobile, the fourth largest carrier in the U.S. is opting for a different approach.  Instead of a direct leap to a 4G tech like LTE, its rolling out a "3.5G" technology HSPA+ technology.  HSPA stands for High-Speed Packet Access, and HSPA+ combines the advances of HSDPA (faster packet downloads) and HSUPA (faster uploads).

The company claims HSPA+ offers "4G-like" speeds.  While some (namely AT&T) take issue with these claims, the tech is much faster than 3G and T-Mobile is rolling it out at a more rapid speed than Sprint or Verizon's 4G rollout.

Of course there's one minor problem -- the company currently has no HSPA+ phones.  The first to land will be the Android G2.

But for those with T-Mobile wireless modems, they can now get HSPA+ speeds in nine new cities -- Boston, MA; Erie, PA; Fresno, CA; Palm Springs, CA; San Diego, CA; Miami, FL; Richmond, VA; Spokane, WA; or Topeka, KS.

Neville Ray, chief network officer for T-Mobile USA comments, "Our new network offers today’s available 4G speeds to more people than any other wireless network in the country and we’re not done yet.  We are now on pace to more than double our HSPA+ footprint – reaching more than 200 million people by this year – with plans to offer 42Mbps theoretical speeds in 2011."

Its obvious there is demand for 3.5G and 4G technologies.  What's frustrating is that while Sprint, T-Mobile and others charge ahead with their deployment, there still are relatively few compatible handsets (or none in T-Mobile's case).

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Strk on 9/1/2010 10:20:15 PM , Rating: 2
It is 4g, but the downside to WiMax is that the range kind of sucks and it tends to have terrible penetration

By TheRequiem on 9/2/2010 1:33:02 AM , Rating: 2
Actually, your statement is completely incorrect. WiMAX uses bands much higher then 700 mhz,therefore, has much farther range then LTE. However, it has less building penetration then LTE, but the differences are minuscule. Verizon's LTE is true 4G, yes, but technically so is WiMAX and they BOTH have theoretical speeds well over 100mbps. You'll see those types of speeds within 3 - 5 years on both technologies. Let's not forget because Sprint has a large footprint already in 4G, they will also be the first to have much higher speeds when upgraded. Clearwire is claiming they will be field testing 4G STABLE LTE next year at 20 - 80mbps down speeds, which is technically already a 4.5G. Something other companies will not have for awhile...

By BruceLeet on 9/2/2010 5:42:35 AM , Rating: 2
It's funny when people want to argue about what technology is better when in truth they're finding pro's and con's that even it out. 3G? 3.5G? 4G-like? true 4G?

Given all their flaws argued I think it's still at 3G.

By Chaser on 9/2/2010 8:25:15 AM , Rating: 2
Well you think wrong. How about 4G? Yeah 4G. Read the above posts rather than your baseless, dismissive, wishful guess.

By sprockkets on 9/2/2010 7:08:03 PM , Rating: 2
That's a load of crap and you know it. 3G didn't debut at 300kbps, which is barely faster than 2.5G.

And frequencies have nothing to do with it; 2G and 3G are used on various frequencies from 850 all the way up to 2100mhz.

"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki