backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by leexgx.. on Sep 2 at 10:37 PM


Sprint has two phones capable of using its 4G WiMAX network -- the EVO 4G and the just-launched Epic 4G. T-Mobile has no current phones compatible with its 3.5G HSPA+ network, but will soon get its first, the G2 Android smart phone.  (Source: Sprint)
Next gen coverage is reaching more users

Fourth generation wireless technology (4G) offers faster data transmission speeds which is critical to smartphones or computers using tethering to access the internet.

This week Sprint, the third largest carrier in the U.S., announced that three more cities are covered by its 4G network.  The additions to the official coverage list are Boston, MA; Daytona Beach, FL; and Providence, RI.  With the additions, Sprint now covers over 40 million people in approximately 40 large U.S. cities.

Sprint is betting on the 4G tech WiMAX.  Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile have all pledged to support a rival technology -- LTE -- though only Verizon has begun to implement an LTE test network.  Sprint says it won't rule out developing an LTE network at some point, but for now thinks WiMAX is the superior tech. 

Sprint has finally got its act together and released a pair of 4G-capable phones.  Its HTC EVO 4Gwas the first 4G phone to hit.  Now the Epic 4G is offered as well, giving buyers yet another option.  And Sprint also offers a 4G ready USB modem and wireless hotspot, via a partnership with Sierra wireless.

T-Mobile, the fourth largest carrier in the U.S. is opting for a different approach.  Instead of a direct leap to a 4G tech like LTE, its rolling out a "3.5G" technology HSPA+ technology.  HSPA stands for High-Speed Packet Access, and HSPA+ combines the advances of HSDPA (faster packet downloads) and HSUPA (faster uploads).

The company claims HSPA+ offers "4G-like" speeds.  While some (namely AT&T) take issue with these claims, the tech is much faster than 3G and T-Mobile is rolling it out at a more rapid speed than Sprint or Verizon's 4G rollout.

Of course there's one minor problem -- the company currently has no HSPA+ phones.  The first to land will be the Android G2.

But for those with T-Mobile wireless modems, they can now get HSPA+ speeds in nine new cities -- Boston, MA; Erie, PA; Fresno, CA; Palm Springs, CA; San Diego, CA; Miami, FL; Richmond, VA; Spokane, WA; or Topeka, KS.

Neville Ray, chief network officer for T-Mobile USA comments, "Our new network offers today’s available 4G speeds to more people than any other wireless network in the country and we’re not done yet.  We are now on pace to more than double our HSPA+ footprint – reaching more than 200 million people by this year – with plans to offer 42Mbps theoretical speeds in 2011."

Its obvious there is demand for 3.5G and 4G technologies.  What's frustrating is that while Sprint, T-Mobile and others charge ahead with their deployment, there still are relatively few compatible handsets (or none in T-Mobile's case).



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

4G crap
By sprockkets on 9/1/2010 7:13:31 PM , Rating: -1
So what if Sprint has 4G? It's just as fast or even slower than Att's 3G.

Enjoy your WiMax at a real download speed of 3mbps while the rest of the world blows you away in a year.




RE: 4G crap
By osalcido on 9/1/2010 7:36:07 PM , Rating: 2
What exactly are you angry about here? That this technology is rolling out in the US or that it's slow?


RE: 4G crap
By heffeque on 9/2/2010 10:01:59 AM , Rating: 2
He's angry with the fact that Sprint uses the "4G" word to make people think that their WiMAX is faster than the GSM 3.5G, when in fact it isn't.

The future is GSM LTE (what Verizon and AT&T will be rolling out soon) because "this" 4G can get faster speeds than 3.5G and Sprint's 4G with less overhead and shorter latencies.


RE: 4G crap
By theArchMichael on 9/1/2010 9:01:32 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know about sprint... but we have Clear WiMax here in DC (I actually think Sprint may be a partner along with Google and others). They advertise 3Mbps->6Mbps. In the city people are getting like 5Mbps apparently, thats a pretty good improvement over 3G IMO.


RE: 4G crap
By TheRequiem on 9/1/2010 9:31:57 PM , Rating: 2
AT&T's 3G is faster than Sprint's 4G? Hahaha, I think that is probably the most RIDICULOUS and ABSURD comment I have ever heard in my life, to be quite frank! My friends and family can't even call me without having their calls drop on AT&T, much less get any type of "decent" speed, especially during peak hours. Meanwhile, I have co-workers browsing the internet at 10mbps here in the office on Sprint's & Clearwire's 4G. Don't forget that little "3mbps" WiMAX speed your talking about will be upgraded to speeds close to 100 mbps in a year or so with simple software updates. Also, don't forget WiMAX would relatively need very little work to support LTE. Go back to school cry baby...


RE: 4G crap
By sprockkets on 9/1/10, Rating: 0
RE: 4G crap
By AmbroseAthan on 9/2/2010 12:07:23 AM , Rating: 2
In 1 to 0 bars of signal of 4G in the area of NYC I live (Sprint does offer 4G in NYC, supposedly in "testing"), I get about 2.8mbps down. This is with the EVO.

That crushes my 3G speeds, 6/6 bars 3G is 1.5mbps as of 30 seconds ago.


RE: 4G crap
By TheRequiem on 9/2/2010 1:19:38 AM , Rating: 2
You Sir, are an idiot! and here's proof! AND, it's on an EVO, AND it's in Boston, which is the a new market.

http://i.imgur.com/ZCV1i.jpg


RE: 4G crap
By TheRequiem on 9/2/2010 1:22:27 AM , Rating: 2
Still not convinced??

Here's more proof...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gier-Ba1CTA

I know, the truth hurts.


RE: 4G crap
By TheRequiem on 9/2/2010 1:22:31 AM , Rating: 2
Still not convinced??

Here's more proof...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gier-Ba1CTA

I know, the truth hurts.


RE: 4G crap
By bruce24 on 9/2/2010 10:50:17 AM , Rating: 2
I live just outside Boston, yesterday on my EVO, using the SPEEDTEST.NET app, I got download speeds between 3.6Mb/s and 7.5MB/s. For upload I got as high as 1.1Mb/s.


RE: 4G crap
By sprockkets on 9/2/2010 7:17:13 PM , Rating: 2
That still isn't 100mbps of what 4G calls for. Call me up when WiMax is 4G, not a 3.534094865470 wannabe.

But if you want to fool yourself and call 7-9mbps 4G, go ahead mr idiot.


RE: 4G crap
By Chaser on 9/2/2010 8:05:10 AM , Rating: 2
Obviously you don't own a 4G phone. Get a clue before you spout. And no, playing with your brother's phone or on one at a Sprint store doesn't count.

In downtown Jacksonville FL I get 7Mpbs. I think that might be a little faster than AT&T's 3G. And secondly regarding 3G, Sprint's national 3G coverage is far better than AT&T.


RE: 4G crap
By sprockkets on 9/2/2010 7:59:19 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Obviously you don't own a 4G phone. Get a clue before you spout. And no, playing with your brother's phone or on one at a Sprint store doesn't count.


Obviously you can't comprehend that 4G isn't available in the ENTIRE state of FL, save for one city.


"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki