backtop


Print 70 comment(s) - last by RaggedClaws.. on Sep 8 at 1:40 AM


The EPA's 2008 sticker design (click to enlarge).  (Source: EPA/DOT)

One of the new sticker designs.  (Source: EPA/DOT)

The other proposed new sticker design.  (Source: EPA/DOT)
Sticker is one of two proposed designs, each with new information to help consumers choose their next vehicle

Spiking oil prices in the 1970s inspired the U.S. Congress to pass the Energy Tax Act of 1978, a phased in tax that hits people who buy inefficient vehicles.  Around the same time Congress also mandated that the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation put fuel efficiency labels on all new cars sold at dealerships in the U.S.  Those stickers became a familiar, relatively unchanging sight over the next 30 years.

Starting in 2008, the stickers underwent their first big overhaul.  Today, with new types of automobiles like plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles preparing to hit the market, the DOT and EPA are looking to roll out yet another shakeup to the dealership sticker design. 

The government organizations aired two alternative designs for labels today.  The first design more closely resembles the 2008 label and its contents.  It adds several additional statistics, as well -- offering metrics on CO2 emissions (in g/mile from the tailpipe), "other emissions" (on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being the best possible), how many gallons are used every 100 miles, how the vehicle compares fuel economy-wise with other vehicles in its class, and how the vehicle compares to all other vehicles (including those outside its class) in fuel economy.

The second design is a more radical redesign offering a letter grade to the vehicle in terms of fuel economy.  According to the EPA/DOT proposal page shows a battery electric vehicles getting an "A+", a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle receiving an "A", a compressed natural gas vehicle getting an "A-", and a "flexible fuel" (ethanol-ready) vehicle receiving a "B".  The page insists, though:

Please note that these labels are examples and do not represent real automobiles. 

Thus, it is unclear whether these labels are indicative to what kind of letter grades the actual vehicles in these classes would succeed.  Interestingly, there's no room for failure under the new system.  The worst rating one can get is a "D".

The design bumps the average yearly cost of fuel to a text subnote and instead emphasizes the amount the vehicle "saves" per year, "compared to the average vehicle".  It also bumps the note on how the vehicle stacks up within its class to a text subnote.

Both labels feature special QR Codes that allow smartphones to pull up additional info on fuel efficiency and the model.  Both labels also include special "effective MPG" ratings, to encompass electric vehicle performance.  Electric vehicles have their costs tallied as an "Annual Electric Cost".

The first sticker also includes, for the first time, a short disclaimer on how the fuel costs are calculated (a gas price of $2.80 USD is assumed in the sticker shown).  The letter-grade sticker doesn't include the disclaimer, though both stickers remind customers to go to www.fueleconomy.gov to learn more on the topic.

The EPA is seeking public comment on both designs, in order to decide which to adopt.  You can leave your thoughts, comments, criticism, and suggestions here.





Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Is this supposed to make me feel like a failure?
By Nfarce on 8/30/2010 7:35:16 PM , Rating: 2
If I want to buy a new truck and it gets a D or an F on the new EPA sticker, am I supposed to feel bad because the window sticker has a big fat D or F facing me? What else could this be about? Is our inept and incompetent government (especially these days) trying to play the mind card?

Oh gee, let's see: I have a 5,500lb. travel trailer to tow, a 3,000lb. boat to tow, I like to load up firewood, and I like to come home from Home Depot/Lowes with man stuff in the back of my truck. I guess I'd better sell my recreational toys and go buy a Prius and join the smug latte drinking crowd. "Hey your fellow fart smellers! I got an A+! too"

How ironic however. Our government is ramming our children through public schools with artificially inflated grades to not only get them out of the system but to not offend them and now hurt their self esteem with a big fat D or F . They've even changed the grading scales and means in some schools. Anyone ever wonder why fast food chains in the last decade or so went to symbols instead of numbers and letters on their registers?

I'll go buy another gas hog truck and continue enjoying life, thanks.




By sprockkets on 8/31/2010 9:59:35 AM , Rating: 2
epa doesn't do large trucks (though that may have changed). Obviously trucks like that do actual work unlike say an Escalade, so figure diff ratings.


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007













botimage
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki