Print 87 comment(s) - last by EricMartello.. on Sep 10 at 7:23 PM

New AMD graphics branding

The evolution of AMD/ATI branding
AMD's market research shows that it's time to get rid of the ATI brand

It's been a long four years, but AMD has finally hits its stride after its acquisition of ATI Technologies way back in 2006. After agreeing to purchase ATI for $5.4B, AMD was besieged with quarterly losses stemming from the purchase, constant pressure from NVIDIA in the graphics market, and beatdowns from Intel (who wasn't exactly playing by the rules of fair business) in the processor market.

With most of its troubles now behind it, AMD is looking to kill off the long-standing ATI brand and bring Radeon and FirePro graphics solutions solely under the AMD umbrella according to AnandTech.

According to AMD's own research in markets from around the world, it came to the following three conclusions:

  1. AMD preference triples when respondent is aware of ATI-AMD merger
  2. AMD brand [is] stronger than ATI vs. graphics competitors
  3. Radeon and FirePro brand awareness and consideration [is] very high

The move will also help to further consolidate AMD's branding which has pretty much gotten out of hand in the past few years [see figure on right]. AMD will begin the transition later this year to phase out ATI branding and move to a more simplified product branding lineup. By 2011, AMD's product lineup will consist of AMD's Opteron for server processors, Vision (which consists of a CPU/GPU hybrid) for consumer processors, and Radeon/FirePro for graphics.

With AMD now taking the discrete graphics market lead from NVIDIA (51.1 percent for AMD versus 44.5 percent for NVIDIA) and preparing to take the fight straight to Intel with three new CPU designs, the next year should be a fruitful one for enthusiasts.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Huh?
By EricMartello on 8/30/2010 10:50:30 PM , Rating: -1
Yes, as you can see, people with no money or low standards - the responses support my original statement beautifully. Rate it down all you want...but nobody cares about your POS system that under-performs because you're poor. :D :D :D

BTW, morons, the 20% speed gain matters when you're making money. For some people a computer is an INVESTMENT not a LIABILITY.

RE: Huh?
By tastyratz on 8/30/2010 11:36:26 PM , Rating: 2
There is an extremely finite actual business need for modern day systems and their speed because in general people cant harness a fraction of it. Case in point: All that power and you use it to post on dailytech.

In reality for someone to get 90% of the performance for even 50% of the investment they can upgrade their computer twice as often as you and stay in current generation systems ahead of the game more of the time than not.

Every purchase is an investment, and if the most expensive top of the line computer is your investment unless its chugging 24x7 graphics operations I see your business model failing. You cant tell me your machine will yield more than 5 minute of office productivity in a standard business environment. Running pixar? then we can talk. till then its the same porn halo and google you get on a cheap machine.

RE: Huh?
By Amiga500 on 9/2/2010 3:23:21 AM , Rating: 1
What if I buy 3 machines for the price of your 1 machine, hook them on a network and then have 240% your performance? After all... you do need heavy multi-thread apps to take advantage of all those threads you have.

Who is the person with no standards (or should that be no sense) then?

Yes, a computer is an investment - hence it is important not to pay a disproportionate amount of money for what you are getting. Would you pay 200% more for a top of the line Ferrari compared to its smaller brother which has 90% the performance? Yes, you might - if you'd more money than sense.

RE: Huh?
By EricMartello on 9/3/10, Rating: 0
RE: Huh?
By xti on 9/3/2010 10:11:30 AM , Rating: 1
You realize that neither AMD nor Intel cares about you and your bajillion dollar computer? Thats great and all that you are happy about your purchase, but manufactures are focusing on their fastest sellers, not their greatest margin ones that they sell once in a blue moon.

If I was poor I would still be content than I can understand simple concepts.

RE: Huh?
By Etern205 on 9/3/2010 1:34:52 PM , Rating: 1
Sad news for you as your precious 980x is being replaced by the 990x.

Looks like your e-penis has shrunk by 3 inches. :D :D :D

RE: Huh?
By EricMartello on 9/3/2010 4:17:09 PM , Rating: 1
Sad news for you as your precious 980x is being replaced by the 990x. Looks like your e-penis has shrunk by 3 inches. :D :D :D

What's your point? For the time being the 980x is the best CPU available from Intel, but there's always going to be something better coming up in the future. For people like me who continually improve, what makes you think I wouldn't get the next best CPU when it becomes available?

Looks like you should just stick to fingering your e-vagina. :D :D :D

RE: Huh?
By Etern205 on 9/4/2010 12:03:29 AM , Rating: 2
Real men use Xeons so why don't you take your pathetic low-end 980x and shove it.
:D :D :D

RE: Huh?
By EricMartello on 9/5/2010 3:14:17 PM , Rating: 1
Real men know when to use a Xeon and when to use a 980x...and again, who said I didn't also use Xeons in systems where they would be approriate? You sure are making a lot of fail assumptions here.

RE: Huh?
By Etern205 on 9/9/2010 9:59:59 AM , Rating: 2
What does Xeons have to do with a 980x, there are 6 cores version of Xeons which is a higher-bin version of the 980x and has dual QPI.

It's obvious that someone gave that 980x as a gift and now your running around like some bigshot who know absolutely about hardware.

And stop trolling.

RE: Huh?
By EricMartello on 9/10/2010 7:23:21 PM , Rating: 1
If you're so enlightened about hardware then you'd know that using CPUs for their intended roles more often than not yields better results. The Xeon is intended for workstation/server duty and is optimized for such work. The 980x is an "ethusiast's CPU" that can overclock like nothing else and has more ubiquitous motherboard options.

As for performance, Passmark disagrees with you:

The 980x is on top by a decent margin...and while the Xeon may excel at tasks for which it was optimized - the 980x is still the best CPU for my needs.

If you're running a Xeon in your desktop rig / gaming system then you're definitely fingering you spent about $700 more over a 980x for a CPU that runs slower just so you could say you have a Xeon. LOL

"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki