Print 58 comment(s) - last by PaterPelligrin.. on Sep 2 at 3:41 PM

  (Source: Travelvivi)
But scientists say it did not contribute to global warming today

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) scientist, along with his team, recently used radiocarbon dating to trace carbon dioxide released to the atmosphere from the deep ocean at the end of the last ice age.

Radiocarbon dating employs the use of radioisotope carbon-14 to figure out the age of ancient and prehistoric carbonaceous materials. This process can be used on materials as old as 62,000 years old. 

Tom Guilderson, a scientist at the LLNL's Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry and an author of the study, found that an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations corresponded with a decreased amount of carbon-14 relative to carbon-12 in the atmosphere. 

"This suggests that there was a release of very 'old' or low 14/12CO2 from the deep ocean to the atmosphere during the end of the last ice age," said Guilderson. He noted that CO2 release may increase the rate at which ice melts after an ice age. 

Ocean circulation regulates radiocarbon in the atmosphere, and in turn, this regulates the sequestration of carbon dioxide in the deep ocean by atmosphere-ocean carbon exchange. Around 110,000 to 10,000 years ago when the last ice age occurred, lower atmospheric carbon dioxide levels coincided with increased atmospheric radiocarbon concentrations, which have been "credited to great storage of CO2 in a poorly ventilated abyssal ocean." The circulation of the ocean was drastically different back then, and Guilderson admits that he and his team do not fully understand the manner in which carbon was stored in deep ocean at that time. 

The team dated two sediment cores from the subtropic South Pacific near New Zealand and the sub-Antarctic to be approximately 13,000 and 19,000 years old. Guilderson was able to determine when the large CO2 release occurred using the carbon-14 in the cores. Also, he was able to determine the ocean pathway by which it escaped. 

"In this case, the absence of a signal is telling us something important," said Guilderson. "Deeper waters substantially depleted in carbon-14 were drawn to the upper layers and this is the main source of the CO2 during deglaciation. Data suggests that the upwelling of this water occurred in the Southern Ocean, near Antarctica. In our cores off New Zealand, which lie in the path of waters which 'turn over' in the Southern Ocean, we don't find anomalously low carbon-14/12 ratios.

"This implies that either water which upwelled in the Southern Ocean, after 16,500 years ago, had a vigorous exchange with the atmosphere, allowing its 14C-clock to be reset, or the circulation was significantly different than what the current paradigm is. If the paradigm is wrong, then during the glacial and deglaciation, the North Pacific is much more important than we give it credit for."

This carbon dioxide release sped up the melting, but when asked about CO2's contribution to

global warming today, Guilderson said this release of CO2 from the last ice age "is not relevant." But he did mention that he has used radiocarbon dating on CO2 in the atmosphere today, and that isotopic signature shows that use of fossil fuels is what is causing global warming. 

The study was published in the August 26 edition of Nature

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Slow news day
By mdogs444 on 8/30/2010 11:08:36 AM , Rating: 3
You cant blame that on the schools. They do teach math and science, and you know it.

Sure - they're incorporating man-made Global Warming as fact into science classes and dismissing Regan's name completely from ending the Cold War.

They'd rather concentrate on teaching sex ed to children as early as 1st grade, focus on black & white incorporation, acceptance of LGBT, a the idea of a perfect social Utopia.

You know it, and I know. The influence of personal emotion and politics into our public school system has turned it into garbage.

RE: Slow news day
By retrospooty on 8/30/2010 12:42:16 PM , Rating: 3
uuuhhh... paranoid much?

You know, not every single issue is a launch point for your partisaned rants. Seriously? Reagen? LOL

RE: Slow news day
By vortmax2 on 8/30/2010 2:19:15 PM , Rating: 3
Sad thing is that the liberal long-term strategy is to control the schools so that the next-gen kids grow up with a leftist bent. This is frighteningly similar to the current strategy of Islamic terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah when it comes to indoctrinating the children in Lebanon and Gaza...

RE: Slow news day
By foolsgambit11 on 8/30/2010 2:50:58 PM , Rating: 5
Public schools have always been a battleground for the hearts and minds of the next generation. One of its founding principles is the ability to indoctrinate children to be 'good citizens'. The trouble is, while that sounds great in general terms, people can't really agree on what it means to be a good citizen.

To compare strategies as you did is, in and of itself, totally useless. That's like saying the Nazis used a shock and awe campaign, just like America did, therefore America is bad. Or that terrorists are fighting a holy war, and so did the Crusaders, therefore Christianity is bad. You have to explain why the tactic is wrong in and of itself, and then avow that your side won't ever use it, either. So no more Pledge of Allegiance in schools, because that's indoctrination, for instance.

Besides, when you says the liberal long-term strategy, you make them seem way more organized than they are.

"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki