backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by The Raven.. on Sep 7 at 10:49 AM


Dorothy Hodgkin, who discovered the structure of insulin  (Source: vcharkam)
Survey indicates a majority of the British population cannot name one female scientist

According to a recent poll by ICM, a public opinion researcher from England, two-thirds of British population (who participated in the survey) cannot name even one famous female scientist.

The Royal Society, which is a fellowship of individuals who represent all areas of science, organized this survey. The poll showed that almost half of the participants were able to identify at least one male scientist while two-thirds could not name even one female scientist.

Furthermore, 90 percent of 18 to 24-year-olds could not name a current or historical female scientist. Lorna Casselton, Vice President of the Royal Society, said these results were "frustrating."

The number of those who were aware of female scientific figures in the poll were very low, with 18 percent who identified Dorothy Hodgkin as the creator of the structure of insulin, and only six percent who identified Jocelyn Bell Burnell as the scientist who played a role in the discovery of pulsar stars. 

Other results were that 20 percent of 1,000 adults chose "Nobel prize-winning scientist" as the best role model for their daughters. These adults were given six role model choices to choose from, ranging from doctor to lawyer and pop star to athlete. Almost half chose "life-saving doctor" as their first choice. 

"People are still unaware of the contribution made by women to science in the past, [but] overall I am encouraged by the findings of this poll," said Casselton. "They suggest public perceptions of women in science are changing. [We] want to encourage more girls (and their parents) to see science as an achievable and desirable career path. Most importantly, we want to encourage them to see science not only as a fulfilling career, but one that can change the world and contribute to our quality of life."

In other news, the United States government is encouraging Indian women to enter science and technology-related fields by offering research fellowships and internships that could bring these women to the U.S. With support of the Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum, the U.S. embassy New Delhi created a one-day workshop about women in science where many young women in high school and above listened to female business leaders encourage them to "stick with science."


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: lol
By bill4 on 8/27/2010 8:51:05 PM , Rating: 1
The reason there are no women scientists is because women are less intelligent.


RE: lol
By the3monkies on 8/28/2010 2:22:44 AM , Rating: 3
Somebody's not getting laid.


RE: lol
By B3an on 8/28/2010 3:47:18 AM , Rating: 1
It's taboo, but woman are less intelligent at things like this. There are some that are very good at it and can match any male, but in general they just aint interested as much in it, and usually are not as good as it. There brains simply are not made for this stuff as well. Male and female brains physically differ in some areas, and some parts are used more than others.


RE: lol
By PaterPelligrino on 8/28/2010 5:05:27 AM , Rating: 2
I think much of this is cultural. For example, global surveys of gender differences in math ability have shown that the gap is very large in countries where women are considered intellectually inferior and/or not encouraged to pursue math, while in Scandinavian countries, noted for their sexual equality, there is no gap at all.

This is a review of a recent book that challenges the idea that there are innate intellectual differences between the male and female brains.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/24/science/24scibks...

And I have to agree with 3monkies: the guys who publicly flaunt their contempt of women are usually the ones who aren't getting any.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki