Print 28 comment(s) - last by rett448.. on Aug 30 at 3:53 PM

  (Source: Sustainable Design Update)
Certain bacteria is able to digest hydrocarbons in oil

When the Deepwater Horizon suffered a devastating explosion and ruptured an oil well on April 20 of this year, BP executives spent months trying to figure out a way to stop it, and eventually clean up the mess. What they might not have known was that something had already begun cleaning up the oil only a month after it started spilling into the Gulf of Mexico. 

The clean-up crew was a series of bacteria, like Alcanivorax, which is an oil-eating bacteria found in the ocean. This bacteria only "blooms" when oil is present, and then it feeds on chemicals found in crude oil. According to a team of scientists working on the study, there were large numbers of these types of bacteria present in the Gulf just one month after the leak began, and they had quite a feast.

Terry Hazen led a team of American scientists on an expedition to collect samples of water on two ships in the Gulf between May 25 and June 2 looking for different types of oil-eating bacteria. They found 16 types of bacteria within a deep-sea oil plume about 1,100 meters below surface.

Richard Camilli from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution recently announced that this plume had "persisted" for months after the oil leak began, insinuating that bacteria wasn't breaking down the oil plume as Hazen suggested. Also, Camilli stated that oxygen levels near the plume were stable, and if bacteria were eating the oil, these levels would fall.

Hazen argued that his team was looking directly for the bacteria themselves rather than just traces of their presence, and the results were that oxygen levels inside the plume were lower than the outside, indicating the presence of bacteria. Twice as many bacteria were found inside the plume than outside.

Of the 16 types of bacteria found, Oceanospirllales (which is a group that includes the Alcanivorax) were the most prominent. All the groups on the inside of the plume had oil-eating capabilities, breaking down hydrocarbons within the oil. These groups of bacteria were "genetically distinct" from bacteria outside of the plume, and according to Hazen, salinity, pressure, temperature or any other cause besides the oil would cause this difference.  Hence, Hazen and his team believe these bacteria were there strictly to clean up the oil. 

Now Hazen is saying that the plume has been undetectable for approximately two to three weeks now, and that it disappeared shortly after the leak was capped July 12. While the various types of bacteria found supposedly "ate" the oil, there are some components of the oil that cannot be broken down by bacteria. Only the hydrocarbons are digested by the bacteria. 

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

This article is 10% fluff 90% BS...
By EBH on 8/26/2010 6:24:11 PM , Rating: 1
The bacteria breaks the oil down to a level in which you cannot see with the human eye. The oil is still there just too small to see.

So not only are the particles now smaller (harder to clean up) but much more easily consumed/absorbed by local wildilfe and fauna.

If anyone thinks that cleanup of an oil spill is this easy then they are in need of shock therapy.

By Lazarus Dark on 8/26/2010 6:54:31 PM , Rating: 2

I sense a conspiracy theory.

BP dropped in the bacteria to break down the oil so they don't have to spend the billions cleaning it up, but it's still there, they just took the easy way to make it too small to see.

By stephenbrooks on 8/26/2010 8:18:31 PM , Rating: 2
If the bacteria (aerobically) metabolise the oil, then it will be turned into CO2 and water, using up the oxygen dissolved in the water in the process. There won't necessarily be drops of oil "too small to see" left over.

By RivuxGamma on 8/26/2010 9:14:29 PM , Rating: 2
Congratulations, you're a retard. Does doing a little research really bother you so much that you would rather spew stupid things onto the internet?

By johnsonx on 8/27/2010 3:12:58 AM , Rating: 2
oh, my... we are just gushing with stupid aren't we?

By angryplayer on 8/28/2010 2:53:08 AM , Rating: 2
There is an 80% chance that 30% of the percentages in 55% of the title were made up on the spot.

42% chance of showers with 100% saturation of stupidity.

RE: This article is 10% fluff 90% BS...
By SPOOFE on 8/28/2010 12:16:27 PM , Rating: 5
The bacteria breaks the oil down to a level in which you cannot see with the human eye.

So when I eat a hamburger, my poop is just a whole bunch of smaller hamburgers you cannot see with the human eye?

RE: This article is 10% fluff 90% BS...
By johnsonx on 8/29/2010 1:14:06 AM , Rating: 5
well, that is how it works with corn, isn't it?

By SPOOFE on 8/29/2010 1:12:47 PM , Rating: 2
You need to chew your food more. :D

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki