backtop


Print 73 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Aug 24 at 3:53 PM


  (Source: WAFF-48)

Julian Assange, convicted computer criminal and founder of the controversial website Wikileaks, was briefly charged with rape by Swedish authorities. The charges have since been dropped, but he's still under investigation on allegations of molestation.  (Source: AP)

Assange's packed trip also allowed him to sign a partnership between Sweden's Pirate Party and Wikileaks. Assange says that the two organizations "share many values ".  (Source: Torrent Freak)
Wikileaks inks serving deal with Pirate Party, known for its support of illegal downloads

It's been a wild weekend for Sweden and the site Wikileaks.

On Friday Swedish authorities issued an arrest warrant for Julian Assange, founder and commander in chief of Wikileaks.  According to Karin Rosander, a spokeswoman for the prosecutor's office, Mr. Assange had been arrested in absentia and faced raped charges on two separate instances.

Then on Saturday Chief Prosecutor Eva Finne posted an official statement on a government website stating that Mr. Assange is "no longer wanted" and "is not suspected of rape."  However, the statement indicates that Mr. Assange is still under investigation on molestation charges.

In Sweden molestation is a sex crime that can apply to nonconsensual sexual contact among adults, as well as with minors (unlike in the U.S., where it typically refers to inappropriate contact with minors).  Also, unlike the U.S., the offense is not punishable by prison time.

Sources in the Swedish media said the investigation stems from Mr. Assange's trip to Sweden last week.  During that active trip Mr. Assange reportedly had sexual encounters with two women -- aged 20 and 30.  Reportedly both encounters were consensual, but Mr. Assange then allegedly engaged in nonconsensual sexual violence.  After the women connected and shared their stories, they decided to approach Swedish police.  Ironically, Aftonbladet, the tabloid that Mr. Assange recently signed a deal to report for, was the first to publish the 30-year-old's account of the situation.

Mr. Assange on Saturday called the allegations a "dirty" trick.  He also appears to have posted on a Wikileaks-affiliated Twitter account, "The charges are without basis and their issue at this moment is deeply disturbing."

While Mr. Assange now seems out of serious legal danger, the allegations are certainly embarrassing for Australian native who now finds himself a hot topic in the Swedish tabloid he recently launched a career with.  Mr. Assange has had his share of legal troubles over the years, being a convicted computer criminal in his home country.

Besides signing on to write for Aftonbladet, which may help Wikileaks obtain Swedish journalistic protections, Mr. Assange also found time in his apparently packed trip to sign a pact with Sweden's Pirate Party.  The Pirate Party, known for its promotion of currently illegal music, film, and video game piracy, will offer hosting service for Wikileaks.

Pirate Party leader Rick Falkvinge comments, "I’m delighted that we’re able to help WikiLeaks.  I love opportunities to demonstrate that one of the biggest differences between us and the other parties is that we positively leap at any and all changes to take real responsibility for changing the world, rather than just commission reports and avoiding blame like the archetypal politician."

Mr. Assange says that his organization shares much with the Pirate Party.  He states, "We welcome the help provided by the Pirate Party.  Our organizations share many values and I am looking forward to future ways we can help each other improve the world."

Wikileaks also hopes the Pirate Party will push for more protections for it in Sweden's Parliament.  Mr. Assange states, "We hope that the new Parliament will give serious consideration to further strengthening Sweden’s press protection legislation. Western democracies are not always as free as one might think, and freedom of the press needs constant vigilance.  In particular, we would welcome Sweden copying Iceland’s Modern Media Initiative, something that the Pirate Party also desires."

Currently based in Iceland, Mr. Assange has been the subject of harsh criticism from the Obama administration and U.S. military leadership, which claim that his site's massive leak of U.S. military field memos from Afghanistan may result in bloodshed.  Afghanistan's insurgency, the Taliban, claims that the first round of leaks allowed them to track down and kill a tribal leader who was aiding the U.S.  The Taliban is known for its terrorist tactics.

Mr. Assange, though, claims that the only solution to eliminating government corruption is complete transparency.  He is currently preparing to release more documents, even as the U.S. government reportedly scrambles to protect its Afghani informants from the potentially deadly cost of exposure.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: So tell me, Mick...
By Reclaimer77 on 8/22/2010 7:35:38 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
All I said was that Assange's sexual behavior - criminal or not - has nothing to do with whether or not Wikileaks did the right thing when it published American military secrets.


Well that's not even a debate. Of course they did the wrong thing. Are you insane? But I think that's the heart of this issue. Assange is viewed as some sort of hero or champion of rightness by a lunatic fringe on Daily Tech and the web, so he's defended. If he was a hum drum tax attorney or whatever, we wouldn't be having this discussion. If the leaks were about anything else, nobody would care. It just so happens his leaks, in crazy peoples minds, are vindication. So they don't really care who does it or what kind of person is at the wheel.

quote:
You seem to think Wikileaks shouldn't have published those documents, so you just take Assange's trouble with the Swedish police as somehow being vindication of your prior judgment.


Actually none of my arguments were based on this recent allegation. He's ALREADY a convicted criminal and dirtbag. It's not like I need MORE proof to back my opinions up.

Even if nobody has been killed yet because of his leaks, it's a known fact that he's taken an already volatile situation and made it worst. Lives HAVE been effected, that's not up for debate. His threat to release even more secrets, whatever the cost, shows what kind of person he is.

quote:
btw, has it also escaped your attention that I haven't taken a position on the Wikileaks controversy?


You clearly have. I don't need you to spell it out for me when you've said it in so many words.


RE: So tell me, Mick...
By PaterPelligrino on 8/23/2010 12:34:24 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
You clearly have. I don't need you to spell it out for me when you've said it in so many words.

Now you're reading something into my words that just isn't there. Setting aside the question of whether or not we should even be fighting these wars - about that I have very strong opinions indeed - and limiting the discussion to the leaks, I can see that both sides have valid points and I really can't say where I stand on the issue. Sometimes life's like that.

However, character assassination is sleazy. If you want to weigh into the debate, keep to the point, what does Assange's willy have to do with anything?

(Actually, what I really want to talk about is John McCain's secret love-child with that black woman - does anybody have a pic of the mother and child?)


RE: So tell me, Mick...
By PaterPelligrino on 8/23/2010 12:34:47 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
You clearly have. I don't need you to spell it out for me when you've said it in so many words.

Now you're reading something into my words that just isn't there. Setting aside the question of whether or not we should even be fighting these wars - about that I have very strong opinions indeed - and limiting the discussion to the leaks, I can see that both sides have valid points and I really can't say where I stand on the issue. Sometimes life's like that.

However, character assassination is sleazy. If you want to weigh into the debate, keep to the point, what does Assange's willy have to do with anything?

(Actually, what I really want to talk about is John McCain's secret love-child with that black woman - does anybody have a pic of the mother and child?)


RE: So tell me, Mick...
By michael67 on 8/23/2010 4:32:03 AM , Rating: 1
Let me put it in simpler terms, Most Americans don't trust there politicians to do the right ting all the time.
Guise what, non Americans trust them even a lot less to do the right thing till them.

And these reports about the war in Afghanistan mean noting, what the US government is really shitting there pants over, is the State department cables.

If there is in it, what i think is in it, things like personal opinion's about other country's and leaders, that could hurt the US diplomatic relations really bad.

As for Wiki Leaks, I think there goals are honorably (to get rid of (government corruption), how they go about it, I don't know, most of what they put up was pretty good, on the Afghan reports they properly could have done a better job, doo.

And a site like Wiki Leaks could imo have a function to keep governments honest.
I am still not sure if this will do it, and to be honest I think the criticism they got till now was deserved.

Hope they do the next time a better job in screening the information better before releasing.


RE: So tell me, Mick...
By Paj on 8/23/2010 7:45:53 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Assange is viewed as some sort of hero or champion of rightness by a lunatic fringe on Daily Tech and the web, so he's defended.


Hardly a fringe - hes won a few awards for his journalistic works, inlcuding one from the Economist. You could say he has more integrity than 99.9% of journalists working today, as he doesnt have to spin or doctor anything to please an audience – or an editor – at all. Hes exposed injustices all over the world - including the killing of two journalists in Iraq by a US helicopter. Its not hard to see why the US military wouldnt want THAT to be widely known - and would take any means necessary to discredit him.

Was publishing the Afghan documents the wrong thing to do? If it endangers the lives of good people, then yes. Another point worth noting - Wikileaks contacted the DoD for assistance in redacting the documents, so important identities would be protected. The requests were ignored.

But if it exposes injustice and cover ups as well? Harder to call. Do the ends justify the means?


RE: So tell me, Mick...
By Ammohunt on 8/24/2010 3:53:29 PM , Rating: 2
So if there is a cover up of atrocities by US Soldiers why would they(the soldiers) report civilian causality numbers in the first place? Wouldn't they want to hide that fact? I mean they are all evil baby killers aren't they?


"The Space Elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing" -- Sir Arthur C. Clarke














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki