Fujitsu Announces World's Largest Capacity Storage Arrays, 1.3 Petabytes
April 24, 2006 11:00 AM
comment(s) - last by
2760 drives, 500GB each, one huge storage array
Storage has become monumental these days, especially with various companies broadcasting companies going online and making TV shows and movies available for IP viewing. Such trends in the industry push storage companies to create and invent new ideas and products that not only drive prices down, but give consumers plentiful choices in storage technologies.
Fujitsu recently launched
what it claims to be the world's largest storage array, the ETERNUS 8000 and ETERNUS 4000 storage arrays. Weighing in at 1.36 petabytes, or 1.36 million gigabytes, the ETERNUS file storage arrays push the envelope for enterprise data storage systems. Fujitsu uses 2,760 nearline fibre-channel 500GB disk drives in its flagship ETERNUS server (model 2100) and can be configured with up to 256GB of cache.
World's largest storage capacity (over 1 petabyte)
World's highest storage performance from up to sixteen 3.6GHz dual processors per system
RAID6 (double parity) support. Enhanced reliability even if simultaneous HDD failures occur
Disk to Disk backup using Nearline FC disk drives
Multi-functional backup options with OPC, QuickOPC & SnapOPC
Cost-effective disaster recovery solutions using iSCSI
Data encryption for online and offline information security
Fujitsu packs in preventative maintenance features such as tape backup, data encryption, and data automation features into the ETERNUS arrays just in case disaster should strike. Performance wise, Fujitsu says that its servers can be equipped with up to 32 dual-core processors, giving the arrays unmatched throughput. Fujitsu hopes to ship 14,000 units over the next two years.
While Fujitsu claims the largest array available, EMC Corporation
launched the first petabyte server
that was commercially available back in January of this year.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: i wish...
4/26/2006 9:49:35 AM
Gmail has no use for this box. Gmail runs on the Google filesystem. Poke Google for URLs. They run commodity boxes in large clusters. No large disk arrays. That's the whole point of Google.
And "nearline" does NOT mean they spin down disks. In this case "nearline" is referring to the FATA disks they use. They have dual-port fibre channel interfaces, but SATA canisters. They cost much more than commodity desktop drives, and provide port failover if one of the interfaces fails, but they're still just 7200RPM ATA quality drives inside.
Go poke NetApp's website for their R100 "nearline" appliance. It doesn't spin down disks either.
Spinning down disks is dangerous, and often leads to data loss. Companies like Copan have spent years working out the issues with spinning down disks, duty cycles, and other issues. This is not a MAID box.
And there's no heirarchical storage management going on here. There's only one tier of storage. Even MAID boxes don't qualify as HSM. The simple fact that they're fronting the array with cache doesn't make it HSM.
RE: i wish...
4/29/2006 6:23:51 AM
RAM > CACHE > PRIMARY STORAGE > NEARLINE > TAPE
By definition using nearline is hierarchical.
It is not as expensive or fast as primary but is great as an intermediate place to make tape backups from.
Primary storage may be something like 15K scsi or solid state disk array.
Many people set their disks to spin down. All you need to be aware of is a per-drive limit of (say 40,000) startups.
So its no use spinning down your primary storage.
But you COULD spin down SOME of your nearline storage if what you put on it is infrequently accessed.
RE: i wish...
4/29/2006 6:32:04 AM
Using the "MAID" (idle) definition ie standby mode, "MAID" would sit between NEARLINE and TAPE in my > diagram.
However there could be a hybrid nearline box that supports MAID operation on SELECTED disks, the remainder being kept up. Therefore it may spin down a particular or not depending on what is on it and access patterns.
The article does not state whether THIS device offers such a function but I accept nearline does not necessarily imply the device has it.
"This is about the Internet. Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information