backtop


Print 128 comment(s) - last by 0ldman.. on Aug 18 at 12:33 AM


Americans are using more fuel because they weigh so much.  (Source: Healthy Me!)
"If you see me coming your way/Better give me plenty space"

Americans these days are living big, though not necessarily in a good way. Even as some people in America turn to healthier lifestyles, obesity rates continue to soar upwards.  That's frustrating news not only for doctors, but for transportation engineers as well.

We already covered how obesity was costing the U.S. airline industry $275M USD more a year in fuel use.  But according to
Consumer Reports, it's not the only transportation industry to buckle under the America's growing mass.

The publication cites a 2006 study which indicates that for every pound added to the national average passenger weight, 39 million more gallons of fuel are used.  In total, over 1 billion gallons of fuel a year (about 0.7 percent of the nation's total use) can be attributed to fat.

Other studies show that the effect, while small, may be larger than those previous estimates.  Non-profit company Resources for the Future in 2009 showed that between 1999 to 2005 a 10-percent increase in overweight and obese drivers reduced fuel economy of new vehicle demand by 2.5 percent.

The report also comes to the more controversial conclusion that obesity is driving SUV, van, and pickup truck purchases.  It attributes much of the rise in this sector from 16 percent of total sales in the 1970s to over 40 percent today as being the result of passengers seeking cars to deal with their growing size.

Another study, which we previously covered, comes to the conclusion that obese drivers are more likely to be injured during car wrecks despite their extra mass apparently overcoming whatever padding their flab provided.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that in America obesity rose 1.1 percent from 2007 to 2009 -- meaning that roughly 2.4 million people entered the category for the first time.  Plus the number of states with over 30 percent obesity rates jumped from three to nine.

Consumer Reports suggests both that Americans need to lose weight and that plus-sized crash test dummies need to be implemented to better protect those who haven't lost weight yet.

There's not always an easy answer for obese drivers.  An Edmonton, Alberta Kia dealer last year was forced to inform a woman who purchased a Kia Rio that she might be too heavy for it.  The sedan was pulling towards the left.  The dealership tried to correct it, to no avail, but eventually gave up, realizing the laws of physics were stacked against them; the driver had too much mass.  

 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Thanks Mick
By Reclaimer77 on 8/12/2010 2:43:57 PM , Rating: -1
Talk about anti-American slant by Wikileaks? Dude, it's hard enough fighting off the euro-trash retards on Daily Tech without playing into their stereotypical portraits of the average American.

We're not all fat!! Even by this own studies admission, a tiny minority of the population has a problem. Come on man, this article is just offensive.




RE: Thanks Mick
By nafhan on 8/12/2010 3:01:19 PM , Rating: 5
I disagree. This article is legit. The US was the first nation to hit the productivity and leisure levels we now enjoy, and we're also the first nation to deal with the consequences. As all those alcohol and drug abuse programs say (more or less): awareness is the first step.
Japan, along with the wealthier Asian countries, and the "Euro-trash" are catching up quickly, but we're the number one fatties (for now). Hopefully, we can also be number one in taking care of our weight problem. I think discrimination against fat people (who don't have a genuine health problem) is a reasonable way to deal with it. To be clear, by discrimination I don't mean calling names or physical abuse. I mean stuff like higher airline ticket prices, etc.


RE: Thanks Mick
By DarthKaos on 8/12/2010 3:29:15 PM , Rating: 2
I agree with you nafhan. I don't want to pay more for airplane tickets because of over weight people. I am no skinny mini either. I am above my BMI but would not consider myself obese. Also I don't live in denial saying thing like "the obesity problem in the US is not that bad" or "the percentage is so low how could it matter". Some of these posts make similar statements to these and I just had to cringe. .7 percent of 100 is not much but .7 percent of 3 million sure is. Plus no matter what the studies say being over weight is leading to more health issues than we know. Being over weight is just plain bad for you like smoking, drinking too much too often, or doing crack. If you had a friend who only did crack once a day would you say "that is fine. you don't do it that much so it is not bad for you"?


RE: Thanks Mick
By tmouse on 8/13/2010 8:44:06 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
.7 percent of 100 is not much but .7 percent of 3 million sure is.


Yes .7% of 3 million is a larger number but so is 97.3% of 3 million.

quote:
no matter what the studies say being overweight is leading to more health issues than we know


I do not even know what you are talking about here. I have never even heard of a study that states that being morbidly obese does not lead to health problems. Now the term overweight is totally meaningless since it depends on who is determining the ideal weight. The percent fat is what is critical and the only real accurate and reproducible way to measure that is hydrostatic weighing, although body fat scales and skin calipers will do in a pinch (pun intended).

Too much of ANYTHING including exercise is bad for you; the devil is in the details what defines “too much”. The problem I see is “powers that be” choose a segment and demonize them like smokers, sex offenders and overweight people. The majority can agree they have "bad" traits and accept penalties on them. The problem is we slowly allow the government to erode our self determination in the name of "security". Now I’m not saying some taxes, penalties ect. are not to the benefit of the majority but think twice before blindly accepting these things.

Put a frog in boiling water and he will jump out, put one in cool water and slowly raise the temperature and you will have frog soup.


RE: Thanks Mick
By Nutzo on 8/12/2010 6:59:33 PM , Rating: 2
If you can fit in a single airline seat (with the arms down), and can easily walk a couple miles when you go to the local park or beach, then you do not have health related weight problem and people should mind thier own business


RE: Thanks Mick
By Lerianis on 8/15/2010 4:05:40 AM , Rating: 2
Little problem with that second part. Even when I weighed 140 pounds at 5' tall, I couldn't do that second part easily.

Wasn't from 'lack of exercise' either since I got LESS than my cousin did and she didn't have problems with that.

As to fitting in a single airline seat? Get real, even a MIDGET would have a hard time doing that with as freaking small as the seats are today.


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki